Define “terms” of a contract
Any statement forming part of a contract, any term broken can bring actions
Define “representations” in terms of a contract
A statement made by one party to the other which is to induce them into signing the contract, this does not form part of the contract but if if proven untrue can bring actions for misrepresentation
What will a court look at when deciding if something is a term or representation?
What are the three types of terms?
What is a condition?
A major term of a contract, which form the essence of the contract and why is was made. Breach of a condition allows the other party to repudiate (reject) the contract or continue with and and claim damages
What is a warranty?
A less vital term than a condition, but still an important term of the contract. Breach of warranty entitles other party to damages but not to reject the contract completely
What are innominate terms?
is a contractual term that, when breached, does not automatically allow the injured party to terminate the contract; instead, the remedy depends on the severity of the breach’s effect. If the breach is serious enough to deprive the injured party of substantially the whole benefit of the contract, it’s treated as a breach of a condition, allowing termination. If the breach is less significant, it’s treated as a breach of a warranty, and the remedy is limited to damages.
What is an express term?
A term that is expressly stated in the contract
What is an implied term?
A term deemed to form part of a contract although not expressly stated
What thee ways can terms be implied?
What is an exclusion clause?
A contract term that seeks to exclude or limit the parties legal liability for specific breaches or events, such as defected goods or negligence
What are the three levels of protection with exclusion clauses?
What is the “contra proferentem” rule?
If there is any ambiguity in an exclusion clause, the courts will construe it a way that is unfavourable to the party that included/relied on it
What is the repugnancy rule?
When courts strike out exclusion clauses that contradict the main purpose of the contract
What is the doctrine for fundamental breach?
An exclusion clause may be allowed even if it is a fundamental breach of contract, provided it is reasonable. For example, if a company trains an employee properly, any actions taken by the employee that are the opposite of the training cannot be claimed against