When was it approved?
1995
Why was it created?
To avoid interference between codes from different professional associations
- Serves as orientation for members codes, gives an ethical reference frame
- More reflexive approach, without excluding practicalities
- Appeals more to individuals ethic responsibility than norms
“…strife to help the public in developing informed judgements and choices regarding human behaviour… privileged knowledge to improve the condition of both individual and society”
Respect for a persons right and dignity:
privacy, confidentiality, self-determination and autonomy, sonsistent with the psychologists obligations and with the law
Competence:
ensure and maintain high standards of competence. Recognize their boundaries of competencies and limitations of expertise. Only provide services they are trained for.
Responsibility:
aware of professional and scientific responsibilities to their clients, community, and society. Avoid doing harm and are responsible for their actions. Asure their services are not misused
Integrity:
In science, teaching and practice. Honest, fair and respectful of others. They aim to clarify their roles and act according to them.
when resolving an ethical question or dilemma will require reflection and often dialogue with clients and colleagues, weighing different ethical principles.
Respect for a persons right and dignity:
general respect, privacy and confidentiality, informed consent and freedom of consent, and self-determination
Competence:
Ethical awareness, limits of competence, limits of procedures, continuing development and incapability (judgement aversely affected)
Responsibility:
general responsibility, promotion of high standards, avoidance of harm, continuity of care, extended responsibility and resolving dilemmas
Integrity:
recognition of professional limitations, honesty and accuracy, straightforwardness and openness, conflict of interests and exploitation, and actions of colleagues (nformer)