Fayol: the 5 functions of management
1. Planning
All managers need to think ahead. Senior management will establish overall objectives and these will be translated into tactical objectives for less senior managers. The planning needed to put these objectives into effect is also important. For example, new production or marketing objectives will require the planning and preparation of sufficient resources.
2. Organising resources to meet objectives
Employees need to be recruited carefully and encouraged, via delegation, to take some authority and accept some accountability. Senior managers should ensure that the structure of the business allows for a clear division of tasks. Each functional department, such as marketing, is organised to allow employees to work towards the common objectives.
3. Commanding, directing and motivating employees
This means guiding, leading and overseeing employees to ensure that business objectives are being met. Employee development will help motivate employees to use all of their abilities at work. Managers should be capable of motivating a team and encouraging employees to show initiative.
4. Coordinating activities
As businesses grow there is a greater need to ensure consistency and coordination between different parts of the business. The goals of each branch, division, region and employee must be welded together to achieve a common sense of purpose. At a practical level, this avoids the situation where, for example, two divisions of the same company both spend money on researching into the same new product, resulting in wasteful duplication of effort.
5. Controlling and measuring performance against targets
Establishing clear objectives for the business, and for each section within it, establishes targets for all groups, divisions and individuals. It is management’s responsibility to appraise performance against
targets and to take action if underperformance occurs. It is just as important to provide positive feedback when things go right.
Mintzberg management roles
1. Interpersonal roles – dealing with and motivating employees at all levels of the organisation.
* Fiqurehead - symbolic leader of the organisation, undertaking duties of a social or legal nature
* Leader - motivating subordinates; selecting and training other managers/workers
* Liaison - linking with managers and leaders of other divisions of the business and other organisations
2. Informational roles – acting as a source, receiver and transmitter of information.
* Monitor - collecting data relevant to the business’s operations
* Disseminator - sending information collected from external and internal sources to the relevant people within the organisation
* Spokeperson - communicating information about the organisation – its current position and achievements – to external groups and people
3. Decisional roles – taking decisions and allocating resources to meet the organisation’s objectives.
* Entrepreneur - looking for new opportunities to develop the business
* Disturbance handler - responding to changing situations that may put the business at risk; assuming responsibility when threatening factors develop
* Resource allocator -deciding on the spending of the organisation’s financial resources and the allocation of its physical and human resources
* Negotiator - representing the organisation in all important negotiations (e.g. with government)
Differences between Fayol and Mintzberg’s approaches
The differences between the approaches of Fayol and Mintzberg should not be exaggerated. Mintzberg did not strongly disagree with Fayol. He just thought that the simple division of managerial tasks into five functions was too closed and limiting. He considered that the role of managers was much more open ended. In particular he stressed the interpersonal nature of many of the tasks that the managers he observed were performing. Mintzberg believed that he had demonstrated, through his systematic framework, that management is much more than the five functions. It must include interpersonal relationships and open-ended discussions with workers and customers.
Autocratic management
* Features
Autocratic management
* Applications
Autocratic management
* Limitations
Democratic
* Features
Democratic
* Applications
Democratic
* Limitations
Paternalistic
* Features
Paternalistic
* Application
Paternalistic
* Limitations
Laissez-faire management
* Features
The term ‘laissez-faire’ means ‘let them do it’. Laissez-faire management allows workers to carry out tasks and take decisions themselves within very broad limits. This is an extreme version of democratic management. There is very little input from management into the work to be undertaken by subordinates.
Laissez-faire management
* Limitations
Laissez-faire management
* Application
McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y
The best management style depends on many factors
Evaluation of Democratic Leadership
Democratic leadership − involving participation and two-way communication – is increasingly common for a number of reasons. Working people are better educated than before and have higher expectations of their experience from work. They expect their higher-level needs to be satisfied at work. Many managers realise that the rapid pace of changes at work, as a result of technological and other factors, has increased the need to consult workers and involve them in the process of change. People find change less threatening and more acceptable if they have been involved in some meaningful way in managing it.