16 A Flashcards

(51 cards)

1
Q

the artificial teeth of a partial fixed dental prosthesis (FPD) that replace missing natural teeth, restoring function and appearance

A

PONTIC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

incorporate mechanical principles for strength and longevity, as
well as esthetic principles

A

PONTIC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

→ meets hygienic requirements and prevent irritation of the residual ridge
→ particular attention to form and shape of the gingival surface
→ facilitate plaque control
→ adjust to existing occlusal condition

A

PONTIC DESIGN

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

FDP is to prevent tilting or drifting of the adjacent teeth into the edentulous space

A

PONTIC SPACE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

→ if orthodontic repositioning is not possible, contours of adjacent teeth may be better than making an FPD with undersized pontics
orthodontic repositioning is not possible, increasing proximal
→ careful diagnostic waxing procedures help determine the most appropriate treatment

A

PONTIC SPACE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

ridge has a smooth, regular surface of attached gingiva which facilitates maintenance of a plaque-free environment

A

RESIDUAL RIDGE CONTOUR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

its height and width should allow placement of a pontic that appears to emerge from the ridge and mimics the appearance of the neighboring teeth

A

RESIDUAL RIDGE CONTOUR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

→ it must be free of frenum attachment and be of adequate facial height
→ design a pontic that meets hygienic requirements and prevents irritation of the residual ridge

A

RESIDUAL RIDGE CONTOUR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

(“black triangles” → food impaction) and percolation of saliva during speech

A

RESIDUAL RIDGE CONTOUR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

→ resorption occurs at the buccal plate resulting horizontal defect
→ 0.3 to 5 mm at 6 months after extraction

A

GINGIVAL ARCHITECTURE PRESERVATION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

→ 50% of the width of alveolar ridge is lost at 12 months
→ the alveolar process can be preserved through immediate
restorative and periodontal intervention at the time of tooth
removal

A

GINGIVAL ARCHITECTURE PRESERVATION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

by conditioning the extraction site and providing a matrix for
healing

A

GINGIVAL ARCHITECTURE PRESERVATION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

→ preserving the facial plate of bone; if bone levels are compromised before or during extraction, the sockets can be grafted with an allograft material (hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate, or freeze-dried bone)
→ immediately after preparation of the extraction site, a carefully shaped interim FDP is placed
→ orthodontic extrusion and root submergence

A

GINGIVAL ARCHITECTURE PRESERVATION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

soft tissue procedure

→ Siebert classified residual ridge deformities into three
categories:

A

SURGICAL MODIFICATION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

faciolingual loss of tissue width with normal ridge height’s

A

Class I Defects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

loss of ridge height with normal ridge width

A

Class II Defects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

a combination of loss in both dimensions involved

A

Class III Defects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

→ not aesthetically challenging
→ surgical augmentation of ridge width is uncommon

A

CLASS I DEFECTS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

→ roll technique tissue augmentation
→ the epithelium is removed and the tissue is thinned and rolled
back upon itself

A

CLASS I DEFECTS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

a wedge-shaped connective tissue graft is inserted into a pouch preparation on the facial aspect of the residual ridge

A

INTERPOSITIONAL GRAFT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

→ a thick “free gingival graft” harvested from partial or full thickness palatal donor sites
→ designed to increase ridge height but also contributes to ridge width

22
Q

striation cuts are made in connective tissue to encourage revascularization

23
Q

→ ridge-lap
→ modified ridge-lap
→ ovate
→ conical

A

Mucosal Contact

24
Q

→ sanitary (hygienic)
→ modified sanitary
(hygienic)

A

No Mucosal Contact

25
→ easy cleaning because its tissue surface remains clear of the residual ridge → disadvantages include entrapment of food particles, which may lead to tongue habits that annoy the patient
Sanitary or Hygienic Pontic
26
concave fitting surface that overlaps the residual ridge buccolingually
Saddle and Ridge-Lap Pontic
27
should be avoided because the concave gingival surface of the pontic is not accessible to cleaning with dental floss, which leads to plaque accumulation
Saddle and Ridge-Lap Pontic
28
→ combines the best features of hygienic and saddle pontic designs, combining esthetics with easy cleaning → pontic overlaps the residual ridge on the facial side but clears the ridge on the lingual side
Modified Ridge-Lap Pontic
29
egg-shaped, bullet-shaped, or heart-shaped
Conical Pontic
30
→ easy for the patient to keep clean → recommended for the replacement of mandibular posterior teeth, for which esthetic appearance is a lesser concern
Conical Pontic
31
only one point of contact: at the center of the residual ridge
Conical Pontic
32
→ its convex tissue surface resides in a soft tissue depression or hollow in the residual ridge, which makes it appear that a tooth is literally emerging from the gingiva
Ovate Pontic
33
→ socket-preservation techniques should be performed at the time of extraction to create the tissue recess from which the ovate pontic form will appear to emerge → a socket depression is sculpted into the ridge with surgical diamonds, electrosurgery, or a dental laser
Ovate Pontic
34
→ socket-preservation techniques should be performed at the time of extraction to create the tissue recess from which the ovate pontic form will appear to emerge → a socket depression is sculpted into the ridge with surgical diamonds, electrosurgery, or a dental laser
Ovate Pontic
35
→ pontic possesses an ovate form with the apex positioned more facially on the residual ridge, rather than at the crest of the ridge → cleansing of this pontic is also purported to be easiest of all pontic types
Modified Ovate Pontic
36
→ pressure-free contact between the pontic and the underlying tissues → passive contact should occur exclusively on keratinized attached tissue
Ridge Contact
37
→ should provide good esthetic results → biocompatibility, rigidity, and strength to withstand occlusal forces and longevity
PONTIC MATERIAL
38
→ glazed porcelain is generally considered the most biocompatible of the available pontic materials → highly polished surfaces accumulate plaque if oral hygiene measures are ignored → well-polished gold is smoother, less prone to corrosion, and less retentive of plaque than is an unpolished or porous casting
PONTIC MATERIAL
39
T or f the buccal and lingual width of the pontic reduced by 30% to lessen occlusal force only when food of uniform consistency is chewed
T
40
T or f harmful forces are more likely to be encountered if an FDP is loaded by the accidental biting on a hard object or by parafunctional activities such as bruxism, rather than by chewing of foods
T
41
T or f narrowing the occlusal surface may actually impede or even preclude the development of a harmonious and stable occlusal relationship
T
42
→ strong, easy to keep clean, looks natural → uniform veneer of porcelain (approximately 1.2 mm) → voids at the porcelain-metal interface will reduce bond strength and increase the possibility of mechanical failure → sharp angles on the veneering area should be rounded → occlusal centric contacts must be placed at least 1.5 mm away from the junction
METAL-CERAMIC PONTICS
43
→ acceptable only as longer-term interim restorations → their resistance to abrasion was lower than that of enamel or porcelain and noticeable wear occurred with normal toothbrushing
RESIN-VENEERED PONTICS
44
→ no chemical bond existed between the resin and the metal framework and so the resin was retained by mechanical means → easy to manipulate and repair and do not require the high-melting range alloys → new-generation indirect resins have a higher density of inorganic ceramic filler
RESIN-VENEERED PONTICS
45
→ can be used in partial FPDs without a metal substructure → a substructure matrix of impregnated glass or polymer fiber provides structural strength → excellent marginal adaptation and esthetics → long-term clinical performance is not yet known
FIBER-REINFORCED COMPOSITE RESIN PONTICS
46
the modified ridge-lap pontic is recommended for most anterior situations; it compensates for lost buccolingual width in the residual ridge by overlapping what remains → sometimes the ridge tissue must be surgically reshaped to enhance the result
GINGIVAL INTERFACE
47
→ duplicating the original tooth is not possible → ridge resorption makes such a pontic look too long in the cervical region → shape the pontic to simulate a normal crown and root with emphasis on the cementoenamel junction → the root can be stained to simulate exposed dentin → use pink porcelain to simulate the gingival tissues
INCISOGINGIVAL LENGTH
48
→ space available for a pontic is greater or smaller than the width of the contralateral tooth → if possible, such a discrepancy should be corrected by orthodontic treatment → an acceptable appearance may be obtained by incorporating visual perception principles into the pontic design
MESIODISTAL WIDTH
49
→ a pontic of abnormal size may be designed to give the illusion of being a more natural size → alteration in the shape of the proximal areas → retainers and the pontics can be proportioned to minimize the discrepancy
MESIODISTAL WIDTH
50
→ allows for easy plaque removal and has good strength, wear resistance, and esthetics → the metal framework for the pontic and one or both of its retainers is then cast in one piece
METAL-CERAMIC PONTICS
51
→ wax pattern is made to the final anatomic contour → to assess connector design adequacy and the relationship between the connectors and the proposed configuration of the ceramic veneer
ANATOMIC CONTOUR WAXING