What determines your internal reaction
A combination of intuitive valuation (lower level evaluation) + deliberate evaluation of the situation
associative memory
semantic memory
culture’s influence on associative learning
culture determines what we are exposed to (our experiences) which determines our associative memory, which determines our intuitive valuations
how does culture shape our models of the world
shapes our implicit model of the world without our awareness
shapes our explicit model of the world with and without our awareness
conditioning
a major way of learning new associations and thus forming associative memories
system 1 + system 2 functioning
system one: intuition
our associative memory determines our intuitive judgements
system two: reasoning
can either REJECT or ACCEPT system one’s intuitive judgments
- over-ridden in favour of our deliberate judgments
- endorsed as our deliberate judgments
system 1 descriptors
INTUITION
fast
parallel
automatic
effortless
associative
slow-learning
emotionsl
system 2 descriptors
REASONING
slow
serial
controlled
effortful
rule-governed
flexible
neutral
availability heuristic
when examples of nothing comes to mind EASILY, system 2 judges the frequency of that something to be HIGH
attribute subsitution
when the individual has to make a complex judgement and instead substitutes a more easily calculated HEURISTIC
substitute frequency to easy in own head
a system 1 process!
processing fluency
the subjective experience of the ease (or difficulty) with which we process given information or accomplish something
high processing fluency = true, good, confident (according to system 1!!)
when is the availability heuristic a good mental shortcut to follow
when it’s unimportant
the experience in modern day is different from before!
heuristics vs statistics: which one has greater influence on our deliberate judgments out danger?
BOTH… which has more depends on CIRUMSTANCE and PERSON
issue with fractions in probabilistic view of danger
risk and achievement within the probabilistic view of danger
for many things, risk is NOT the main focus… but instead achievement is
- running a marathon
- going on a NASA space shuttle mission
however… childbirth is not thought of this way
issues with fractions when talking about danger
words of estimative probability
proposed solution to issues with fractions when talking about danger
~93% = almost certain
~75% = probable
~50% = chances about even
~30% = probably not
~7% = almost certainly not
weasel words
what are our judgements about what is “dangerous” or safe based on and influenced by?
our general model about birth and how it affects our judgments
“birth is dangerous, but intervention (technology/control) makes it safe”
It leads to systematic distortions in our judgments
- overestimating the risk of not intervening
- underestimating the risk of intervening
what are the two most famous representations of birth and how do they depict birth
what do the culturally dominant representations of birth tend to avoid?
examples of culturally dominant values