4 reasons movement is important?
3 ways movement lets you see things you wouldn’t otherwise see?
1a. kinetic depth effect (structure from motion)
–> reveals 3D shape
1b. random dot kinematogram (hidden object)
1c. gradual/fuzzy contours disappear without retinal motion
Kinetic depth effect def? AKA? Explain, example?
Random dot kinematogram meaning?
Gradual contours disappear without retinal motion meaning? What didn’t it apply to?
DOESN’T apply to RIGID borders
–> including the grey square background
Neural explanation for gradual contours disappearing without retinal motion?
Why are we sensitive to biological motion?
Evidence that we’re sensitive to biological motion?
Motion onset captures attention meaning? Evidence? Maybe reason why?
Why? –> could be alive!
Animate motion def? Why does it capture attention? Evidence?
How is a simple neural circuit to detect motion designed? Preferred…? (3 things)
^ this only works if the motion moves from the receptive field of 1 first and then 2 at the right speed
2 types of eye movements?
Saccadic eye movements (saccades) def?
Brief, rapid eye movements that change the focus of gaze from one location to another
Smooth pursuit eye movements def?
Eye movements made to track a moving object or to track a stationary object while the head is moving
Saccadic suppression def?
The visual system’s suppression of neural signals from the retina during saccadic eye movements
Evidence that we take eye movements into account? (Afterimage)
–> eyes (and head) signal movement, but there’s no change on retinal stimulus
–> you see movement
Eye movement experiment monkey –> what does it give support for?
Eye movement experiment monkey –> what are the 2 set ups? What are the results (activity) ?
Version 1:
- monkey fixates straight ahead
- object moves through receptive field
- significant/high activity in neuron
Version 2:
- object is stationary
- monkey moves eyes from spot 1 –> 2
- monkey’s receptive field crosses over the object
- there’s some, but very limited activity, just above baseline
Real-motion cells def?
2 theories on how we account for eye movements?
Inflow theory meaning?
Outflow theory meaning?
Corollary discharge signal?
Important “assumption” to distinguish between theories? (when would we have info?)
INFLOW:
- says we ALWAYS have accurate info about the behavior and position of our eyes
- even if they’re doing something weird, we’d know
OUTFLOW:
- we ASSUME our eyes have ONLY done what we asked it to do based on CDS
- we would NOT know if they were doing something weird