How organisms respond to various ecological factors and in turn how these responses affect ecosystem functioning is fundamental to discerning ecological what?
Ecological consequences of change
What do taxon based approaches compare? What do they often use? Why don’t identified patterns necessarily point to causation/provide mechanistic understanding from a functional standpoint?
What is the focus in trait based approaches?
What are functional traits?
Those that define species in terms of their ecological roles; how they interact with the environment & other species.
What are biological species traits? What do they relate to?
The attributes of a species.
They relate to morphological, biochemical, physiological, structural, phenological, behavioural, and/or any other functionally relevant life-history features of the organism
What is a functional effect trait? What can they help us understand?
What is a functional response trait? What can they help us understand? What is functional redundancy?
What is a functional group?
A set of organisms sharing similar responses to the environment (e.g. temp, salinity, nutrients, competition) / have similar effects on ecosystem processes (e.g. bioturbation) / functioning (e.g. productivity, nutrient cycling)
What is a good strategy for understanding effects of functional diversity on ecosystem processes?
Nesting functional response groups within functional effect groups
Unifies the processes of community assembly and biodiversity effects on ecosystem function.
What are some examples functional trait category/associated categorised trait modality pairings?
body mass -> biomass, biovolume or other size measurement
morphology -> shape, structure & network properties
larval type -> planktotrophic, lechithotrophic, direct development
living habit -> sedentary, errant, attached, tube or burrow dweller
activity -> periodicity (occasional, cyclic, continuous) or mode (e.g. bioturbation, reworking modes)
feeding habit -> detritivore, herbivore, carnivore, omnivore, scavenger, predator, parasitic
resource capture -> jawed, siphon, tentaculate, pharynx, radula
mobility -> sedentary, semi-mobile, mobile
movement -> byssus, swimmer, rafter/drifter, crawler, burrower
environmental position -> pelagic, epibenthic, benthic, physiological requirements
Why is size (typically biomass) not necessarily a reliable indicator of species functional distribution?
reflects a range of other factors, like life stage and recent environmental conditions.
How do tube building species/species with protruding physical structures act as sediment stabilisers?
How do species that disproportionately mix the sediment profile act as sediment destabilisers?
What are the different functional feeding groups? (6)
What are the 6 trophic feeding groups?
suspension deposit carnivore omnivore herbivore
What are the 7 types of bioturbation?
What is the difference between classification and ordination approaches to group species into functional groups?
Classification techniques: tend to assign species on assumed a priori defined species roles & tend to be based on evidence from lit & expert knowledge. Groups similar species based on assumed traits.
Ordination: studies tend to use continuous rather than categorical traits & identify functional group membership using statistical techniques based on measured data. Groups similar species based on measured traits.
What is the requirements of summary functional effect descriptors in order to be useful, but are rarely filled?
What is an example of how species can appear to belong to the same functional group, when in fact being functionally distinct?
Resource partitioning
Diff bivalve species share same mode of reworking (surficial modifiers) and feeding mode (suspension feeding), but diff in body size and occupy v diff depths within sediment profile.
What is a commonly used marker of trophic position?
What is their advantage over gut content analysis?
Analysis of stable isotopes
They reflect tissue assimilation from prey
Aren’t hindered by stomach content biases
What is a commonly used marker of trophic position?
What is their advantage over gut content analysis?
Analysis of stable isotopes
They reflect tissue assimilation from prey
Aren’t hindered by stomach content biases
Why could the food availability hypothesis, regarding sandy and muddy sediments dominated by suspension and filter feeders due to food availability, be incorrect?
i) water column data revealed more organics in water column above mud, but still no suspension feeders
ii) boundaries betw suspension feeding and deposit feeding often too sharp to reflect food supply gradients
iii) hard substrata e.g. rocks in otherwise muddy sediments were not necessarily covered in suspension feeders
What did rhoads and young hypothesise regarding deposit and suspension feeders?
Do deposit feeders increase erosion? Use the Rhoads and Young experiments to explain; they thought that deposit feeders may create much finer sediments that, in turn, would clog the filtering apparatus of suspension feeders.
YES
Does sediment resuspension benefit suspension feeders? Think about growth of juvenile mercenaria mercenaria on trays at different elevations from seabed.
NO
growth of juvenile m mercenaria is inhibited near the unstable sediment-water interface
What is the trophic group amensalism hypothesis? Think about suspension & deposit feeding trophic groups.
What did their rationale include?
Rhoads and Young suggest that there are interactions betw suspension and deposit feeding trophic groups that lead to exclusion of one group over the other.