“I pay the employees so they should work.”
“Why do I need to tell them what to do? They should know.”
These statements typify the
idea that behavior is primarily caused by Internal influences.
does not have a working understanding of the Science of behavior.
cannot explain Why employees do what they do.
Traditional management attitudes
3 Reengineer the organization’s performance system to maximize and sustain performance.
three strategies for improving and sustaining employee performance,
• Sub- discipline of ABA which is the
application of the science of behavior.
• GUIDED by a single theory of human
behavior and has historically emphasized identification and modification of the
ENVIRONMENTAL variables that affect directly observable or verifiable employee performance (Bucklin, Alvero, Dickinson, Austin, & Jackson, 2000).
• necessary in all aspects of ABA
Organizational Behavior Management (OBM)
sub-divisions of OBM,
The most straightforward application
of ABA to a Business setting.
Typically involves analyzing individual or small groups of employees and modifying the environment to improve PERFORMANCE
Necessary but may not be sufficient
If you are self-employed you probably don’t need this
Performance Management
Typical interventions include:
Performance Management
necessary but may not be Sufficient
If you are SELF- employed, you probably don’t need this
- Those who are self-employed care quite
a bit about the company and the customers. All contingencies are aligned but for many employees this is not the case.
Equitably aligns the contingencies in an organization
so that the Better the employees and company do, the more money they can make, all things being equal
Performance management
A system with input, an entity that changes its behavior in response to
conditions Outside its boundaries.
Systems rarely ever either open or closed but open to some and closed to other influences.
Adaptations, learning and all manifestations of intelligence require….
open system
…..Some openness to information
Open book management
Advantages
Some drawbacks:
Open book management-Pay for Performance
If a behavior analyst were to design an ideal organization, it would
likely utilize a ….
. You might be a business owner someday
PFP system.
• monetary incentives are Counter-productive.
- Some reasons they offer include: - —rewards encourage people to focus only on one task, to do it as often as possible, and to
take few Breaks.
-people come to see themselves as
Manipulated
- problems associated with valid performance management,
- programs are Complex
-Extrinsic rewards can demotivate,
- employees can game the system
-determining correct Objectives is difficult
- (teachers), and employers do not believe
superiors will accurately Evaluate their performance.
-lhard to put in place
Objections to PFP Pay for performance
• Merit increase,
annual bonus,
stock options,
profit sharing
Gain sharing,
piece rate,
commissions,
Goal sharing.
Traditional performance pay plans
• management’s discretion
variable expense,
may retain employees.
Annual bonus
Alternatives for PFP-
Traditional performance pay plans
Pays from expense Reduction
may promote cooperation
impacts performance relative to group size
Unbalanced
Inequitable
modest performance gains
self-limiting over time.
Example:
(Please see video and presentation slides for images
.)
Gain sharing
Alternatives For Performance Based Pay
- Traditional
-generates High production
equitable
no limits to earning
Piece rate- Traditional performance pay plan
is familiar,
low-effort,
employees tend to prefer, but it’s
Non-Contingent
inequitable
fixed cost
often Subjective.
Based upon :
The merit increase
allow management control
Variable expense
provide a tax benefit,
retain employees.
non-contingent
no impact on behavior
may be Inequitable
involves repeatability
becomes an expectation.
Stock options :
based upon year-end Profit, easy to administer, may retain employees.
non-contingent
little impact on behavior,
Inequitable
becomes an expectation
-Non Profit Sharing Calculation:
(Please see video and presentation slides for images
Profit sharing
setting a goal(s) and paying money when Goals are met
provides for balanced performance goals
May produce higher level of performance
can be applied to most jobs
Can be customized
may not motivate,
payouts for each measure often independent which discourages balanced performance.
Can pay out when the company is unprofitable
Budget: fixed percentage of each employee’s base pay is assigned as an Incentive opportunity.
- Each incentive pay period the employee’s
scorecard score is multiplied by the assigned opportunity (e.g. 10% opp. X 80% score =
8% payout).
Goals sharing
Generates high production
equitable
No limits on earning Potential
May encourage discounting, selective selling,
poor service, and credit risks
Discourages cooperation.
ethical considerations
not indexed to Profitably
employee does not care about others or the
company.
Sales commissions - Traditional pay
jobs will fill the time.
might abuse overtime
- Sin of Wages
Conventional pay rewards Under-performers and punishes top performers.
- Sin of Wages