psychodynamic theory of human thought and behaviour
the mind is full of psychological or intrapsychic forces that motivate people’s actions
-many of these are ones that we arent consciously aware of
-they originate in early childhood
-these things that were formed in childhood that are in our unconscious are things that are at the root or our adult behaviours because we arent aware of them
-
sigmund freud 1856-1939
freud’s three components of personality: the ID
freud’s three components of personality: the ego (or negotiator)
-tries to seek a compromise between the constraints that society imposes on behaviour and the urges of the ID (we want things, but we can only get away with certain things)
freud’s three components of personality: the superego (your conscience)
-your conscience
-knows all the rules by parents or society that you are supposed to follow
-it is responsible for the pride when you do something good, and the shame when you dont
-
the conflict of the ID and the superego
personality development according to freud
children must resolved a series of psychosexual stages, in order to be a healthy balanced adult
Psychosexual stage: oral stage (birth to 1yr)
Psychosexual stage: anal stage
2-3 yrs
Psychosexual stage: Phallic (oedipal) stage
4-5yrs
Psychosexual stage: latency stage
6-puberty
Psychosexual stage: genital stage
puberty to adulthood
some objections to the psychodynamic theory
objections to freuds theory: male centered
it is male centered, the penis envy is the idea that any emotional problems that females have is due to their dissatisfaction with being female
-this was challenged by karen horney, who thought that maybe mens problems came from their dissatisfaction with being male
objections to freuds theory: bleak view of human nature
all the emphasis is on sex and violence
humanistic psychologists
carl rogers: humanistic psychology
had a more happy look on human behaviour
the rogerian approach to personality: we search for positive regard
we search for positive regard (all of us)
the rogerian approach to personality: incongruence
self concept does not mesh well with actual experience (you are not doing what you want to be doing)
the rogerian approach to personality: congruence
your self-concept meshes well with your actual experience
the rogerian approach to personality: sequence of incongruence
believes that affection from others is conditional > pump themselves up to seem better than they in their shortcomings in order to feel worthy of affection from others> this would result in an incongruence, cause you have a self concept that way overestimates your abilities, and pumps you up to a high self concept that you could never establish> produces recurrent anxiety>to reduce anxiety the person may get defencive behaviour like bullying people into thinking that they are the best person ever in order to maintain the slf concept> back to incongruence> then anxiety
abraham maslow
-similar to carl rogers
-though that humans were more than sexual and violent
-had the idea that people get more primitive needs met first before other needs like social
-
maslows approach to personality
says that what people really want is to seek self-actualization, which means that people want to be the best that they can be
-the problem is that the word presents an obstacle to this b\c it makes it necessary to fulfill other needs first, before you reach the ultimate goal
maslow’s needs hierarchy (bottom to top)