What does the nature side of the debate argue?
That behaviour and characteristics are determined by inherited/innate factors.
What are psychologist who argue for the nature stance called?
Natavists
What did Descartes argue?
That all human characteristics and some elements of knowledge are innate.
What is a heritability coefficient?
A measure of the extent to which a trait has a genetic basis, displayed as a number between 0 and 1 (where 1 = entirely genetic).
What did Plomin (1994) find about IQ?
That IQ has a heritability coefficient of 0.5, meaning 50% of intelligence is genetic.
What does the nurture side of the debate argue?
That behaviour and characteristics are shaped by experience and environment.
What are psychologist who argue for the nurture stance called?
Empiricists.
What is “tabula rasa”?
John Locke’s idea that we are born as a “blank slate” — all knowledge and behaviour comes from experience.
What are Lerner’s (1986) two levels of environment?
What is interactionism?
The view that nature and nurture both contribute to behaviour and interact with each other, rather than one being the sole cause.
What are epigenetics?
When environmental influences leave a marker on DNA — it does NOT alter the DNA sequence itself but affects how genes are expressed.
What is the diathesis-stress model?
The idea that a genetic vulnerability may exist but often needs to be triggered by environmental factors.
What is constructivism?
The idea that people create their own nurture by seeking out environments suited to their nature, which then further influences behaviour. Plomin called this niche-building and niche-picking.
What is the “anatomy is destiny” criticism of the nature stance?
Linking genetics to traits has historically been used to justify discrimination e.g.:
- 1952 USA: The government attributed IQ differences between Black and white Americans to genetics.
- Nazi Germany: Hitler’s eugenics policies were based on the idea that certain ethnic groups were inherently inferior.
What does concordance research suggest how does it support both nature and nurture?
For some traits there are high rates of concordance between individuals, suggesting a strong genetic element.
However, there has never been a characteristic with 100% concordance rate meaning nothing can be entirely genetic.
What is the ethical issue with using nurture to shape behaviour?
Token economies and behaviour-shaping techniques raise ethical concerns — in extreme cases they can be used to control society, as seen in Bolshevik Russia and Nazi Germany.
Why is researching environmental influence difficult?
Sibling studies are often used, but siblings can share the same environment yet have very different experiences and outcomes, complicating attempts to isolate environmental influence.
What did Rhee & Waldman find and how does it support the nurture stance?
A meta-analysis into aggression found that 41% of variance was due to genetic factors - meaning 59% was due to external/environmental factors, supporting the nurture side.
What did Plomin argue about separating nature and nurture?
Plomin stated it is “illogical to separate the two as they are so intertwined.”
What did Dunn & Plomin find about shared environments?
They proposed the idea of shared and unshared environments — siblings can have the same environment but very different experiences, leading to different outcomes.
Why is interactionism difficult to apply in practice?
You cannot always determine the relative contributions of nature and nurture — it is hard to work out the weight of each interaction.
What research support is there for interactionism from epigentics?
In 1944, the Nazis blocked food distribution to the Dutch, causing 22,000 deaths. Susser & Lin (1992) found that women who were pregnant during the famine had low birth weight babies who were twice as likely to be diagnosed with schizophrenia.
What is the free will vs determinism debate?
The extent to which behaviour can be explained by choice or by factors beyond your control.
What are the five types of determinism?