Test for content-based restrictions on speech
Content-based restrictions on speech generally must meet strict scrutiny.
Two type of content based laws:
Test for content-neutral restrictions on speech
Content-neutral laws burdening speech generally need only meet intermediate scrutiny
Prior restraints
A judicial order or administrative system that stops speech before it occurs.
Rules for court orders suppressing speech:
Rules for free speech licenses
Vagueness
A law is unconstitutionally vague if a reasonable person
cannot tell what speech is prohibited and what is allowed
Overbreadth
A law is unconstitutionally overbroad if it regulates substantially more speech than the constitution allows to be regulated.
Fighting Words
Fighting words laws are unconstitutionally vague and overbroad
The government can regulate conduct that communicates if
Is incitement of illegal activity protected?
The government may punish speech if there is a substantial likelihood of imminent illegal activity and if the speech is directed to causing imminent illegality.
Is obscenity and sexually-oriented speech protected?
The test
May government use zoning ordinances to regulate the location of adult bookstores and movie theaters?
Yes
How is child pornography treated?
Child pornography may be completely banned, even if not obscene
(To be child pornography, children must be used in production of the material).
May the government punish private possession of obscene materials or child pornography?
The government may not punish private possession of obscene materials; but the government may punish private possession of child pornography
When is profane and indecent speech no longer protected by the First Amendment?
2. In schools
Is advertising for illegal activity, or false and deceptive ads protected by the First Amendment?
No
Can true commercial speech that inherently risks deception be prohibited?
Can regular commercial speech be regulated?
If intermediate scrutiny is met
May a public official or someone running for office recover for defamation?
Yes, by proving:
May a public figure recover for defamation?
Yes, by proving:
May a private citizen recover for defamation, if the matter is of “public concern”?
Yes, by proving:
However, the plaintiff may recover presumed or punitive damages only by showing actual malice
May a private citizen recover for defamation, if the matter is not of “public concern”?
Yes. The plaintiff can recover presumed or punitive damages without showing actual malice
Rules on privacy: