whats molecular antiferromagnetism
its where u have 2 TM with unpaired e-,, and theyre bonded together by a bridging ligand
theres a magnetic interaction between them ,, these magnetic properties arent additive
the e- distribution of the ligand // bridging ligand is affected by what
its affected by the unpaired e- distribution of the metal its bonded to
when we think of molecular magnetism,, what should we think of
think M - X - M
with bond angles which affect it a lot!!
if we are given the dimer thing of M - X - M,, what do we need to do
figure out the d e- count and see where the unpaired e- is,, if its in the t2g or the eg.
then draw the orbital u just figured out and draw the p orbital for the ligand,, make sure u draw it so it matches
then fill the e- in ,, it can be random at first but then u need to acc think,, remember to fill in all the p orbital e- bc this is very important if u want the right answer
then look at the e- in the e,tal and see if theyre aligned or not. aligned = ferro ,, not aligned = antiferro
eg orbital unpaired e- looks like
a Jesus cross
t2g orbital unpaired e- look like what
a pirate cross
if we have 2 t2g metal orbitals,, what p orbital do we use
we use the standing up one rather than the flat // chicken leg one
if we have orbitals that are orthogonal ,, aka ones that dont line up completely // perfectly,, what are they called and how do we fill them with e-
theyre called orthogonal and we say that the e- in these want to be aligned,, aka if thigs dont match up directly we put the e- facing the same way
think of hunds rule and how u put them in with the same spin direction
when filling our diagrams with e-,, what. do we need to make sure we do
we need to make sure we fill the p orbital completely before moving ontp the other metal!!! to make sure we have the correct metal e- arrangement
what do we need to make sure we do when our angle is 90* and we have a px and py cross thing for our ligand and a eg for the metals
we fill the first metal with an e- in any direction.. then we put the e- in one of the p petals,, then we put the other e- in the other petal,, then we still have the downward p orbital and for this one we need to make sure that the top p petal is aligned with the second e- we added to it,, so make sure the 2ne and the 3rd p e- are aligned aka in the same alignment. then we fill in the 4th and the other metal one!!
we then look at the metals and see if the e- are aligned or not. aka ferro or antiferro
whats the whole draweing the d and the p orbital and finding the magnetism thing called
its called the super exchange pathways and its used to predict magnetism
how do we predict // find how strong these interactions are,, aka the interactions with magnetism
we quantify J in bimetallic complexes
what is J
J is the enrrgy change between the triplet and singlet state.
triplet being if the s=1 and singlet being if the s = 0
if J aka change in energy is positive,, what does that mean
it means u have ferromagnetism
aka the e- in the metals are aligned
and that them being aligned is the lower energy state aka the one we want to be in most the time
if J aka chnage in energy between singlet and triplet is negative,, what does this mean
it means that the metals // the thing is antiferro magnetism
aka the e- are no aligned
this means that the spins being in opposite directions is acc the lowest energy state
when we know what the spin is,, how do we find J
we know spin so therefore we know what equation to use,, bc the equations show u whcih one to use for each spin bit
we then fit ‘X’ ,, aka suscpetibility against T,, the line of best gives u J
when we plot X against T what do we need to do
we need to chnage J
bc X = J/KT
X includes J
so u vary J until u get the best fit
the more positive J is the more what
the stronger the ferro interaction
the more negative the J value the more what,, the more negative the what
the more negative the value., th stronger the antiferro interaction
if we have an acute angle what should we think
we should think that its probs ferro magnetic coupling
the more obtuse the angle the more what
the more obtuse the angle,, its more likely to be antiferromagnetism
if we have a metal oxide,, as we increase the covalency what happens
as u increase covalency in bonds,, u increase the Tneel (k) aka the neel temperature
aka as u go go from early to late tm,, the covalcney increases and u get a larger TN(k)
ferromag
aligned
antiferro mag
not aligned ,, they cancel out