A11 Cases Flashcards

(23 cards)

1
Q

Cisse v France

A

Even peaceful assemblies can be disbanded without violation of A11 - case for preventing crime and disorder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Appleby v UK

A

No right to assemble on private land, must leave if protest can be held elsewhere

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Plattform Artze fur das Leben v Austria

A

Demonstrations can offend, held without fear of violence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

DPP v Jones

A

Can assemble on or near highways so long as it doesn’t obstruct a public place

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

G v Federal Republic of Germany

A

Assembly not in accordance with A11 if designed to cause disorder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Faber v Hungary

A

Must be some level of tolerance for demonstrations that shocks, annoy or distress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Young, James and Webster v UK

A

Right not to belong to an association

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

McFeeley v UK

A

‘Association’ is not just spending time in other people’s company

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Compte, Leuven and Meyere v Belgium

A

Association doesn’t include professional regulatory bodies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Redfearn v UK

A

Political parties can be associations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Ezelin v France

A

Demonstrators can’t commit ‘reprehensible acts’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Zilliberg v Moldova

A

Freedom of assembly and A10 are the foundations of a democratic society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Laporte v CC of Gloucestershire

A

Actions taken must be proportionate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Larmela v Finland

A

For the protection of health and morals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Countryside Alliance v Attorney General

A

For the protection of the freedom and rights of others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Ellis v Loftus Iron Co (1874)

A

“If the defendant place(s) a part of his foot on the claimant’s land unlawfully, it is in law as much a trespass as if he had walked half a mile on it”

17
Q

Drury v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (2004)

A

Trespass to land principle was used to evict travelers parked on land belonging to others

18
Q

University of Essex v Djemal (1980)

A

Trespass to land principle was also used in respect of sit-ins

19
Q

DPP v Chivers

A

A building is a form of land

20
Q

Edward Bauer v DPP (2013)

A

‘Additional conduct’ can be anything, there’s no requirement for it to be a criminal activity. But it needs to be accompanied by having the intent to obstruct, disrupt or deter by intimidating

21
Q

R v Howell

A

A breach of peace is an act which can likely or does cause harm to a person or property. It must result in an imminent breach of the peace. If the threat to the peace is not imminent then a police officer may stop you.

22
Q

McClure and Moos V Com. Police of Men

A

Kettling is legal provided it is used as a last resort.

Kettling is when protestors/those assembling are kept in a specific area and not allowed to leave

23
Q

ASLEF v UK

A

A union has a right to not admit a person for legit reasons, especially when the views of a member are fundamentally at odds with the union.