assuming there was a valid offer……
issue whether a valid acceptance to have mutual assent
Restatement 50
“Acceptance of an offer is a manifestation of assent to the
Restatement 50 (short)
a o a o i a m o a t t t t m b t o i a m i o r b t o
courts look to both the ______& _____ of the acceptance to determine if it was effective
content & form
then do mirror image rule
MIrror Image Rule
content
offeree’s acceptance must be on the same mirror image terms of the offer
Bilateral K
consists of a promise seeking a return promise as acceptance
Unilateral K
consists of a promise seeking a return performance as acceptance
The Modern Approach of courts
view the return promise or performance as interchangeable w/ either type of K.
Acceptance by Silence
Ordinarily silence cannot serve as acceptance UNLESS:
1) where the offeree takes the BENEFIT benefits of services reasonable person expects to pay
a. Ex, dining out
2) Offer set up to receive mutual assent through inaction by silence
3) Where reasonable for offeree to inform offeror he does not accept because of past dealings or otherwise.
MAILBOX RULE (form)
An acceptance is EFFECTIVE upon proper dispatch into the mail
Restatement - “any reasonable medium under circumstances”
Hypo that will be unclear & state 2 possible conclusions:
i. Seller makes offer by leaving phone msg. Offeree accepts by mail. While acceptance in mail and before seller receives it, seller calls to revoke the offer. Result?
➢ “If use of the mail was not an acceptable reasonable medium under the circumstances, mailbox rule does not apply…rejections are valid upon receipt & acceptance would be valid upon receipt
➢ If use of the mail was an acceptable reasonable medium under the circumstances than the mailbox rule applies and the acceptance became effective as soon as it was dropped in the mail.