Becoña (2015)
conducted a literature review of the Vietnam Veteran Study in relation to drug consumption ○ Found that soldiers greatly increased their consumption of heroin in Vietnam ■ Had easy access to heroin (in the golden heroin triange of countries surrounding Vietnam), was very pure heroin, cheap ■ The consumed it to bear army rules and reduce homesickness ○ Showed that heroin consumption and dependence upon returning home was similar to that reported before going to Vietnam, where consumption increased temporarily ○ This reduction did not reflect treatment results ○ They call this spontaneous remission ○ If addiction was only biological – would this trend still be true? No, this is a criticism of the brain disease model Demonstrated that opiate use does not necessarily lead to addiction
James Olds and Peter Milner 1954
○ Electrodes were implanted into various points in the brain of rats, and the animals were placed in a Skinner box, arranged so that they could stimulate themselves by pressing a lever. ○ Especially when this brain stimulation was targeted at certain areas of the brain in the region of the septum and nucleus accumbens, the rats would repeatedly press the lever – even up to 2000 times per hour ○ This lead to the postulation by Olds (1956) of “pleasure centers” in the lateral hypothalamus and related brain regions ● Criticism: there would have to be multiple levers in the box for the rat to investigate, one of which resulted in delivery of a hedonic reward; rats are naturally curious and explore their environment – so if there was only one lever, they may have pressed it not because of the hedonic reward, but because it was something to play with ○ Also trauma of have the electrode put into the rat’s brain ● However, this is the work that ultimately lead to the notion that an identifiable brain mechanism subserves the fact that animal behaviour is driven by reward and punishment
Robert Heath 1960s
○ In one case, he even implanted electrodes to try and cure homosexuality (1972), with this line of research ultimately stopped and rightfully deemed unethical ○ Although the researchers also found compulsive lever pressing in some patients, it was never clear from these patient’s subjective reports that the electrodes did indeed cause real pleasure – this is criticism of this study ○ Some researchers today suggest that the electrodes never caused intense pleasure or ‘liking’ after all, but only a form of ‘wanting’ or motivation to obtain the stimulation ○ This does not support the animal studies above – suggests a more complex process in humans
Yokel and Wise 1975 and 1976
“● Rats were trained to lever-press for IV injections of amphetamine, a drug that causes release of each of the four monoamine neurotransmitters – noradrenaline, adrenaline, dopamine and serotonin. They trained animals to self-administer IV amphetamine and challenged with selective antagonists for adrenergic or dopaminergic receptors ● With dopamine antagonists, low and moderate doses – animals increased their responding (as do animals tested with lower than normal amphetamine doses) ● Rats treated with higher doses of dopamine antagonists increased responding in the first hour or how but responded intermittantly thereafter (as do animals tested with saline substitued for amphetamine. ● Wise observed similar effects in rats lever-pressing for cocaine in 1977, a year after ● These findings were interpreted as reflecting a reduction of the rewarding efficacy of amphetamine and cocaine, such that the duration of reward from a given injection was reduced by dopaminergic, but not noradrenergic, antagonists “
Wise 1978
○ Took 4 groups of rats and 2m long runways, where 3 of 4 groups had food rewards at the end. Used a dopamine antagonist in selected groups as well (pimozide) they were leaver-pressing for food ■ One was no antagonist given ■ One was give 0.5mg/kg of DA receptor antagonist ■ One was give 1 mg/kg of DA receptor antagonists ■ One control with no food ○ When initially tested, the animals responded normally to food reward – the pimozide-treated animals responded just as well as the animals that were given food in the absence of pimozide ○ Conducted repeats days later where food was again presented ■ In group with no antagonist → down walkway with normal speed ■ Control group with no food → no running = slower ■ The two groups that had the DA system blocked, on the first day they responded normally, but on following tries they began behaving more and more like the control with no food – ‘when retrained and tested a third and fourth time under pimozide, the animals still initiated responding normally but ceased responding progressively earlier’
Di Chiara and Imperato 1988
Microdialysis of DA (dialysis tubing inseretd into Nac and VTA) following administration of opiates, ethanol, nicotine, amphetamine, cocaine. Showed all drugs increase Nac DA.
Microdialysis has poor temporal resolution - they looked at DA release over 5 hours, need something more acute (need to see subsecond dyamics)
Daberkow 2013
Amphetamine increased phasic DA. Very dynamic dopamine changes in response to amphetamine. ‘Not like turning up volume’
Did not relate this phasic signalling to development of addiction, and only looked at amphetamine
Correlational, next studies show causation
Tsai et al 2009
● Focussed on DA neurones selectively ● Used optogenetics to stimulate VTA neuron action potentials ● Used a Cre-inducible adeno-associated virus (AAV) ● Used the conditioned place preference paradigm ● There were two chambers → one light and one dark ● Mice recieved phasic optical stimulation in one chamber ● Displayed a conditioned place prefernce for the environment where the VTA neurones were stimulated, in absence of other role ● Demonstrates role of VTA in reward
Pascoli et al 2015
Mansvelder et al 2002
They studied the effects of nicotine application to horizontal sections of rat brains containing the VTA. Whole cell patch clamp recordings were made from VTA dopaminergic neurons. After application of 250nM nicotine, which is a nicotine concentration experienced by smokers, GABAergic IPSC frequency increased briefly and then rapidly returned to normal or below normal levels. After this, sensitivity to 1microM nicotine application was completely abolished, indicating effective desensitisation of nAChRs on GABAergic inputs to VTA neurons. However, after application of 250nM nicotine, 1microM nicotine application further increased EPSC frequency. Therefore, nicotine desensitises nAChRs on GABAergic inputs more than receptors on glutamatergic inputs, and therefore enhances excitation of postsynaptic dopaminergic neurons.
Corre et al 2018
Assumption - That direct light activation of presynaptic axon terminal recaoutulates the normal release process compared to APs generated at the soma
Rice and Cragg 2004
FSCV to look at effects of nicotine in guinea pig brain. Looked at dynamic release probability of dopamine during phasic burst (1-7 pulses of phasic bursts). Control - increasing burst number results in the same amount of DA release. Nicotine - increased DA release with increased bursts. Mimicked by beta 2 antagonist of nAChR. Concluded that nicotine acts of B2 subunit containing receptors to densensitise them
Nicotine given to whole cell so we don’t know know where in the neuron nicotine is acting and if it is physiologically releavnt (physiological release will be more local from INs for example)
Berridge et al 1989
injected 6-hydroxydopamine into rat midbrain VTAs to destroy dopaminergic neurons. Taste tests were then conducted on this rat group and a control rat group. Many different solutions were used- at the two ends of the spectrum, sweet sucrose and bitter quinine were used. Ingestive rat responses include paw licking and lateral tongue protrusions, while aversive responses include gaping and forelimb flailing. There was no significant difference in taste responses between dopamine-deficient and control rats, which indicates that hedonic reward experience is intact.
Hnsako et al 2005
Kringelbach et al. (2003)
used BOLD fMRI to demonstrate that activation of the mid-anterior orbitofrontal cortex correlated with subjective rating of food pleasantness in healthy volunteers - 10 men given tomato juice, flavourless solution or chocolate milk - shows that dopamine neurons do not necessarily encode the pleasure of reward - pleasurable aspects of reward are encoded by other brain nuclei - such as the OFC.
Limitations - Does not exclude the nigostriatal pathway, only male subjects, only food reward (not necessarily drug addiction - could only be linked to taste)
Hollerman and Schultz 1998
“experiments on monkeys ○ Monkeys were simultaneously presented with two pictures ○They performed a discrimination learning task - when they pulled a lever associated with one of the pictures, they obtained a reward while the other picture was unrewarded ○ Response measured using an electrode implanted in the VTA - initially the monkeys did not know which picture was associated with reward ○ It was found that, on first exposure to the pictures, Neuron activity increases briefly after rewarded stimulus, Neuron activity is briefly inhibited after unrewarded stimulus (unexpected reward) ■ As the monkey learned which the rewarded stimulus was (the pictures were varying in left to right position), both excitatory and inhibitory responses disappeared (a low level of tonic firing occurs) They further found that after learning, dopamine neurons are activated by unexpected rewards (primary or novel enforcers) but not expected rewards AND and that dopamine neurons become activated by reward predicting cues (CS)”
Day et al 2007
used FCV to measure NAc dopamine levels in mice given sucrose (reward). As expected, dopamine initially increased upon sucrose delivery (unexpected reward), but after Pavlovian conditioning it increased upon cue presentation with no rise upon expected reward administration
Volkow et al 2005
administered 11[C]-raclopride to cocaine addicts, which is a D2 antagonist, and visualised the dorsal striatum with PET. One group was shown nature scenes, while the other group was shown scenes of cocaine purchase and preparation. A significantly smaller signal was observed in the second group due to greater displacement of the radioligand by dopamine release.
Chen et al 2013
Ungless et al 2001
Yuan et al 2013
Recently before this paper, it was also shown that after a single cocaine exposure, NMDA-EPSC amplitude is also reduced. This indicated that the increased AMPA/NMDA ratio also has an NMDA-mediated component. GluN3A has reduced Mg2+ sensitivity and lower conductance. Used GluN3A KO mice and heterozygous littermates as controls. IN these KOs, cocaine evoked plasticity of NMDARs was absent, as demonstrated by the normal I/V curve of the NMDAR-EPSCs
Hearing et al 2016
They found that morphine enhanced synaptic strength and transmission at D1 MSN synapses and reduced signalling in D2 MSN synapses - morphine and saline injected into mice, 14 post-injection, did electrophyioloigcal resocrding in NAc shell, morphine increased A/N ratios in NAc shell D1R-MSNs but not D2R-MSNs, AMPAR-mEPSCs amplitude and frequency was elevated in D1R-MSNs w morphine compared to saline whereas frequency but not amplitude was reduced in D2R-MSNs
They knew opioid SA downregulates NAc GLT-1 expression (transporter responsible for 90% glutamate uptake). Antibiotic ceftriaxone increases GLT-1 expression. Treated mice with saline or ceftriaxone for 7-10 days following saline or morphine exposure. Ceftriaxone restored morphine-induced increases in D1R-MSN A/N ratios as well as mEPSC amplitude and frequency to control levels. Ceftriaxone also normalised morphine-induced reductions D2R-MSN mEPSC frequency compared with vehicle-treated morphine mice and saline controls. Cef normalises morphine-induced alterations in glutamate release at both cell types. Cef also blocked morphine induced reinstatement of CPP compared to vehicle treated animals
Investigated if projections from infralimbic cortex to NAc shell were important. Optogenetics - they evoked LTD of ILC inputs to D1 MSNs which blocked morphine induced reinstatment of CPP
Don’t know ceftriaxone MoA - shouldve done GLT1 KD and seen if it still worked then. Also Cef is acting globally (cannot extrapolate effects to only NAc changes). Morpine was experimenter-administered - differs from self-stimulation
Robinson et al 1997
Layer III pyramidal cells in the prefrontal cortex and medium spiny neurons in the core and shell of the nucleus accumbens were identified. Sholl analysis of ring intersections was used to estimate dendritic length. In the core and shell of the nucleus accumbens, dendritic length was significantly increased in amphetamine-treated rats compared to controls. Spine density was also significantly increased, as was the number of branched spines. The apical dendritic length of layer III prefrontal cortical neurons was also significantly increased in amphetamine-treated rats compared to controls.
Grimm et al 2003
used ELISAs to examine BDNF expression in the VTA and nucleus accumbens of mice who had undergone chronic cocaine self-administration several months after drug withdrawal. They found persistent elevation of BDNF in both brain areas, and BDNF levels correlated with cue-induced reinstatement tests of cocaine craving