When do PRs have evidence of authority to collect in and administer estate?
After obtaining grant of representation
What is the method of collection for each type of asset? Bank account balance, actual property, investments, land?
For collecting in assets stage
Where should money collected in be paid into?
Either:
When should PRs begin to pay deceased’s outstanding debts and when should they be paid?
What will PRs be liable for if they fail to pay debts even though there are assets available?
Liable to creditor and any B for consequential loss (e.g. cost of proceedings incurred by creditor to recover debt)
Can an express clause limit PR liability to Bs and creditors?
Can limit liability to Bs but not creditors
How can PRs obtain protection against unknown creditors?
By complying with s27 notice procedure
What must be repaid ASAP to minimise expense of interest payments?
Any pre-grant loan PRs took out to pay IHT
What is a ‘first proceeds’ undertaking?
Given to a bank in connection with a loan; PRs promise to use first moneys raised during administration to repay loan
Failure to comply = breach
What general administration expenses should be paid as and when they arise during administration?
Which of the deceased’s property is available for the payment of debts and liabilities? What about clauses to the contrary?
All of deceased’s property
Any clause to the contrary is void
How will the rules determining the order in which estate assets are used to pay debts and liabilities differ?
Rules differ depending on:
What is a solvent and insolvent estate? How do the rules re what assets are used differ for each?
Solvent = assets sufficient to pay all funeral, testamentary and administration expenses, debts (secured and unsecured) and liabilities
Insolvent = assets insufficient
Does it matter whether legacies can be paid or not when considering which assets to pay debts/liabilities with?
No!
For secured debts, which assets are used?
E.g. a mortgage on deceased’s house
The charged property will bear primary liability for payment of the debt secured against it unless contrary intention shown in will (s35 AEA)
Contary intention = other assets used
What are the consequences if outstanding loan is less than or greater than the value of asset secured?
Less = bad = have to receive house with. mortgage and maybe sell it :(
E.g. A owns a house, Chez Nous (£250,000) which was charged with a mortgage during A’s lifetime (£30,000 is outstanding). By his will, A gives Chez Nous to B. The will is silent on the liability to repay debts.
The effect of s35 AEA is that B inherits Chez Nous subject to the mortgage and is not entitled to have the mortgage debt discharged from other assets in the estate. B therefore may need to sell Chez Nous to repay this debt.
NB this is in the case without a contrary intention (will usually be one)
Why can a solvent estate still affect what Bs will receive if credit will be paid in any event?
The choice of assets used to pay these amounts will affect Bs if their part of estate is used
What is the statutory order re application of assets towards payment of unsecured debts and administrative expenses?
I.e. which assets are used
Will apply unless varied by the will
Never (Not disposed)
Realised (Residue)
Statutory order (Set aside)
Pays in (Pecuniary legacy fund)
Sections (Specific gifts)
By will a testator (T) leaves their estate as follows:
T’s assets, excluding the house, are worth £55,000. The debts of the estate are £6,000 and there is a mortgage of £60,000 which remains outstanding following their death. The will is silent as to what part of the estate should bear the debts.
Applying the statutory provisions:
Unsecured debts (£6,000) will be paid in accordance with the statutory order.
Can categories be used at the same time?
Each category’s assets must be exhausted before moving on to next as required
How does the pecuniary legacy fund work?
What happens to the money of the pecuniary legacies that was meant for Bs if it was used?
Their legacies abate (reduce) proportionately according to value
By will a testator (T) leaves her estate as follows:
T assets are worth £55,000. The debts of the estate are £40,000. The will is silent as to what part of the estate should bear the debts.
Applying the statutory provisions:
Unsecured debts (£40,000) will be paid in accordance with the statutory order
What is the difference in the contrary intention required in the case of secured and unsecured debts?
I.e. for will to override statutory order where contrary intention shown
Secured = More than a general direction, a clear/specific intention for the B of secured asset to receive item free of debt
Unsecured = Express wording of a general direction e.g. for residue to bear the burden of debts
“I give my residuary estate to my executors on trust for sale and out of the proceeds of sale to pay my debts …..”
I.e. to amend order property not disposed of > residue > money set aside for payment of debts = need a general direction
To make sure someone receives house free of a mortgage = need a specific intention
If PRs take assets ‘out of order’ to pay creditors, what can B - whose assets have been ‘wrongly taken’ - use? Are creditors under an obligation to return money given to them?
What does marshalling allow a B, whose inheritance has been reduced, to do?
If the assets to which he was entitled have been wrongly used to pay a creditor, B can compensate himself by going against property which ought to have been used to pay debts
So disappointed B could claim against assets inherited by another B if those assets should have been used to repay debts