What are the two neural explanations?
Limbic System
Serotonin
Explain the limbic system as a neural explanation:
Situated deep in the brain, includes amygdala
Amygdala quickly evaluates the importance of sensory information, and prompts a response (eg. Aggression)
If the amygdala malfunctions due to a tumour, damage, or atypical development, aggression is more likely.
STRENGTH of the limbic system as a neural explanation:
+) Ervin case study of female following electrical stimulation of the amygdala. She showed aggression, like throwing herself at a wall.
This supports the role of the amygdala/limbic system in aggression.
BUT case study.
WEAKNESS of the limbic system as a neural explanation:
-) Raine et al -> 41 murderers PET scans showed abnormal amygdala activity AND reduced glucose metabolism in the OFC.
This suggests the limbic system isn’t the only area involved in aggression.
Explain serotonin as a neural explanation:
Neurotransmitter.
Normal levels associated with behavioural control, as serotonin inhibits amygdala firing.
So, low serotonin levels mean low behavioural control.. aka aggression.
STRENGTH of serotonin as a neural explanation:
SUPPORTS) Raleigh -> gave diets to monkeys.
Those with high tryptophan (increases serotonin) had less aggression.
This suggests that serotonin levels influence aggression.
WEAKNESS of serotonin as a neural explanation:
AGAINST) Dukes et al -> serotonin accounts for 1% variance in aggression using a meta-analysis.
This suggests serotonin doesn’t influence aggression much, meaning other factors are involved.
Explain serotonin as a neural explanation:
Nayrotransmitter
Normal levels associated with behavioural control, as it inhibits amygdala firing.
So, low levels associated with low behavioural control.. aka aggression.
STRENGTH of serotonin as a neural explanation:
Raleigh -> monkeys with high tryptophan (increases serotonin) diets had less aggression.
WEAKNESS of serotonin in aggression:
Dukes et al found serotonin accounts for1% variance in aggression using a meta-analysis.
Shows serotonin has a small role in aggression, meaning other factors are involved.
Explain HORMONAL aggression explanation
Males have 8x more testosterone than females.
Typically, higher testosterone means higher aggression.
Males ages 15-25 have higher testosterone, and more likely to commit violent crimes.
STRENGTH of hormonal explanation of aggression:
Dabbs measures testosterone in the saliva of 692 adult male prisoners, and found higher levels in violent offenders.
Found similar effect in women.. those that committed unprovoked violence had higher testosterone than those that did it in self defence.
Suggests hormones like testosterone influence aggression.
WEAKNESS of hormonal explanation of aggression:
Carre found that high testosterone leads to aggression ONLY when cortisol is low.
When cortisol is high, testosterone’s influence on aggression is blocked.
This suggests the link between testosterone and aggression is more complex.
Explain Genetic factors in aggression PART 1:
Pure genetic theory says genes cause aggression, and passed down.
In reality, genes indirectly cause aggression structurally (ie. Muscle and bone development) or functionally (neurochemical/ hormone systems).
Explain Genetic factors in aggression PART 2:
MAOA gene regulates the MAOA enzyme.
MAOA enzyme breaks down serotonin, noradrenaline, and adrenaline and removes excess amounts to allow neurons to communicate more effectively.
If there is a build-up, aggression may happen.
Dysfunction of the MAOA gene means the enzyme doesn’t regulate serotonin properly and causes aggression.
There is MAOA (L) -> low activity, and MAOA (H) -> high activity.
MAOA (L) means the enzyme is less regulated, so serotonin is less regulated, so there is a build-up and this causes aggression.
SO MAOA(L) causes higher aggression.
STRENGTH of genetic factors in aggression:
McDermott -> controlled experimental conditions
Those with MAOA(L) were more likely to force someone to eat hot chilli sauce despite having to pay to punish than those with MAOA(H).
Supports the role of the MAOA (L) gene in aggression.
WEAKNESS of genetic factors in aggression:
Caspi -> 500 male children.
MAOA(L) involved in aggression (anti-social behaviour when they grew up) but only when they had been maltreated as children.
This suggests an interactionist approach.
Explain the ethological explanation of aggression:
Lorenz suggests aggression is an adaptive instinct to aid survival:
1) ensures strongest and fittest males pass on genes
2) to disperse species members more widely so disease is less impactful
3) help maintain hierarchies in socially organised animals
Ethological explanation suggests animals are born with innate releasing mechanisms (in-built brain structures) that cause a series of fixed action patterns to occur (pre-programmed behaviours) when triggered by a sign stimuli (environmental trigger/ threat).
FAPs are ritualistic, designed to deter other males from removing female access and preventing fees passing on.
Lorenz believe appeasement displays (surrender) are shown rather than fights to prevent the species dying out.
Ritualistic signals only occur for a certain amount of time, as there’s only a certain amount of action-specific energy dedicated to them.
Once aggression is complete, aggression reduces as energy resources are used up.
Lorenz’s hydraulic model suggests FAPs occur when a sign stimuli is absent if too much ASE builds up.
STRENGTH of ethological explanation:
Tinbergen -> During mating season, male sticklebacks will attack a partially red object.
Supports Lorenz ethological explanation as they are innately programmed to respond aggressively if a sign stimuli is present.
WEAKNESS of ethological explanation:
Goodall -> male chimpanzees work together to kill conspecifics (members of the same species) despite appeasement displays.
Contradicts Lorenz’s idea that they won’t kill each other because it means a species dies out.
Suggests the explanation is invalid.
Explain the evolutionary explanation of aggression:
Present day aggression came about as it was adaptive, as our ancestors had the advantage of survival and passing genes if they showed aggression.
Sexual competition (males completing for female access and passing in genes) and sexual jealousy (fear of threats to status as an exclusive sexual partner) show aggression as evolutionary.
Female infidelity must be deterred as it may lead her to leave him and has the child of another man, and genes won’t be passed on.
Sexual jealousy is adaptive, leading to mate-retention strategies to enance reproduction and avoid cuckoldry (raising offspring of another male).
Females show less aggression as they must survive for their offspring.
STRENGTH of Evolutonary explanation:
Puts (males 75% more muscles mass and thicker jaw bones)
Dobash (women beaten by husbands cite extreme jealousy on the part of their husbands as the key cause of aggression)
Daly and Wilson (sexual jealousy underlying factor in 58/214 murder cases. Mate-retention strategies identified as spying, vigilance, guarding etc.)
AGAINST evolutionary explanation of aggression:
Archer -> equal assault rates by men and women…
Much evolutionary explanation research is male focused so gender biased.
What are the three social psychological explanations of human aggression?
1) The Frustration- Aggression Hypothesis
2) Social Learning Theory
3) De-individuation