Why does the history of development focus on EUROPE or the WEST ?
Roman Empire
500bc to 400ad in europe, near east ○ Time of great productivity, development, ○ Sophisticated administration, trade and cultural output. (From rome) ○ Barbarians need to be civilized Declined because significant amount of land were lost.
Middle or Dark ages (or middle age)
Renaissance
(1700s) ○ The idea of development emerged.
○ There were downsides to enlightenment thinking
§ European began to judge other society more harshly. See other culture (e.g. indigenous) that did not have the same broad perspective that european have. Predudice. § Societies without reasons were considered “barbaric”, “uncivilized” “primitive” or “savage” § In attaining “ reason” European societies felt justified in colonizing and judging others § Valuable advances were made, but science empored colonial conquest. □ Railroads ; tools for colonialism □ Not only a project of helping but sharing european supremacy
○ Charles Darwin’s
Origin of Species” 1859 ○ Proposed that species improve over time. ○ Darwin wrote about bodies, but also minds and social organization ○ Natural selection. Stronger and more capable in succeeding ○ In the late 19th century, many people applied darwin’s theories to human societies § Means to differenciate different groups of people on earth. Idea that particular groups of people (euro) reached level of success because they had outsmarted/outevolved others groups over colonial conquest. Superiority ○ Idea that Euros are more evolved took root Non-Euros could develop too, but they were behind on the evolutionary scale
○ European colonialism was extractive. Focused on taking. EXTRACTION (harvesting of natural resources, rubber, ivory, diamond, gold) ○ Natural resources and agrcultural products were transferrred from colonies to EU. (Tea, coffee, sugar cane) ○ Colonial infrastructure designed to serve extraction ○ Wealth generated was returned to the metropole (administrative center of an Empire like London or Paris Extraction justifiable in colonial logicè colonized people had no use for resources ; laborers worked for a greater cause
culture
Franz Boad
(1858-1942) - Founder of american anthropology - German immigrant came to USA. - Maily a geographer, who worked as a museum curator - Carred out research with native peoples on Canada west coast and Arctic - Scientific racism was prominent in America ○ Africans, italians (cuz they were tanner, and shorter), many were discriminated against He argued it was not our bodies that made us different but our CULTURE, the things we learn not the things we’re born with
earliest anthropologist : actor
Lewis Henry Morgan ○ Noticed iroquois had distinct kinship structures. ○ Lineage patterns not random, but highly sophisticated § Come back to the US with the idea that non-western are as sophisticated society but nobody think it is true. ○ Morgan opened the door to the idea that non-Europeans could be sophisticated in their own right ○ This did not involve the argument that all humans were equal, quite yet
first world
First world : democratic nations (USA, Canada’ Australia, Western Europe, South Africa)
second world
Soviet and communist states (China, Yugoslavia, Cuba, USSR)
third world
Third world Formerly colonized countries where both sides sought indluence (Vietnam, Indonesia, Tanzania, Ghana, Brazil, Nicaragua to name a few
the end of history
“The end of history” - There would be no wars anymore. Fukuyama
post-modernism
Post Modernism - In universities, anthropologists and other were confronting intellectual dilemmas. Development is messy - Elightenment thinking ; there is such thing as right and wrong and humans can esasily tell the difference - Modernism : there is such thing as right and wrong, but humans will struggle to tell the difference Post modernism; Defining right and wrong is impossible due to the number of opinions to consider.
Difference between civilizations that have made administrative advancement ?!
they did NOT colonize the world