Antitrust Law Flashcards

(28 cards)

1
Q

Google Antitrust Case

A

google pays apple to install it’s search engine on all new phones, US government is suing them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

4 Ways Antitrust Laws Enforced

A

1) justice department can file a case, democrats are historically more active in antitrust laws, 2) federal trade commission has right to enforce, can only file civil lawsuits, 3) state attorney generals can file civil or criminal lawsuits, 4) private parties can sue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Antitrust law scope

A

applies to all businesses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Sherman Act Section 1

A

a clear trigger for this section is a “contract”, “combination”, or “conspiracy”, whether two actors are acting in a conscious way for joint benefit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Price leadership

A

when a company sets a trend for prices and other companies follow (only illegal if they agree beforehand)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Per se rules

A

these actions are inherently illegal under the antitrust laws, court wont apply rule of reason because the restraint of trade violation is so obvious

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Bid rigging

A

a per se violation: illegal conspiracy like rotating bids or agreeing beforehand to jack up the prices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Sealed bid

A

how much a company is charging for a service, don’t know what competitors are offering

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Price fixing

A

a per se violation: competitors get together and set a price

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Territorial divisions

A

a per se violation: agree not to compete in certain areas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Group boycotts

A

any agreement by two or more sellers to refuse to deal with, or boycott, a particular person or firm, is prohibited (exception are covenants not to compete)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Rule of Reason Test

A

considers the facts surrounding the business practice before deciding if it helps or hurts competition, 1) pro and anticompetitive effects of the restraint, 2) competitive structure of the industry, 3) the firms market share or power, 4) the history and duration of the restraint or act, 6) any other relevant factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

NCAA and student athletes

A

agreement forbidding competition among schools was found illegal, and now athletes can be paid insane amounts of money

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Tying arrangements

A

occurs when the sale of one product is conditioned on the buyers purchase of another product

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Per se tying arrangement

A

seller must have monopoly power from the tying product and use this power to leverage sales of the separate tied product

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Tying product

A

product everybody wants (market power)

17
Q

Tied product

A

product nobody wants but forced to buy

18
Q

Rule of reason tying arrangement

A

if there is no monopoly power, courts will use the rule of reason test

19
Q

Tying arrangement example

A

microsoft illegally tied internet explorer to windows operating system

20
Q

Monopoly power

A

ability to control, or to set the price, or to prevent others from entering the business

21
Q

Monopoly legality

A

monopoly is legal if its the result of patenting something, expanding quickly, superior product, government granted/approved monopoly (highly regulated utilities)

22
Q

The Sherman Act Section II

A

stopping monopolies before they exist

23
Q

Clayton Act

A

the clayton act looks to potential problems in the future and tries to curb them, prohibits certain acquisitions (purchasing rival companies) if the result will be a significant decrease in competition (kroger and safeway merging was stopped)

24
Q

Determining if a merger is lawful courts must

A

define relevant market = product market + geographic market

25
The “Product” Market
1) product market after merging (what are realistic substitutes?), 2) geographic market (baked goods vs jets), 3) potential competitors (barriers to entry), 4) determine what market share the firms have, 5) if merger substantially lessons competition, there’s a problem
26
Barriers to entry
how easy is it for others to enter the market
27
Predatory pricing
a sign of attempted monopolization or monopolisitc power
28
Pricing a product below cost is problematic because
1) lead to monopoly power by driving competitors out, and barring new entrants to the field, 2) eventually a company will achieve a monopoly and then raise prices for all consumers