ACTS
any bodily movement tending to produce some effect in the external world
OMISSION
failure to perform a positive duty which one is bound to do
DOLO V. CULPA
dolo = deceit (deceiving someone by concealing the truth) culpa = fault
ELEMENTS OF FELONIES
EXTERNAL ACTS
FELONY BY OMISSION
CLASSIFICATION OF FELONIES: INTENTIONAL V. CULPABLE FELONIES
intentional felonies
the act or omission of the offender is malicious (with deliberate intent); has the intention to cause harm to another.
culpable felonies
the act or omission of the offender is not malicious or is unintentional, it being an incident of another act performed without malice; still punishable but as a lesser degree and with an equal result
IMPRUDENCE
indicates a deficiency of action; person fails to take the necessary precaution to avoid injury to person or damage of property
NEGLIGENCE
indicates a deficiency of perception; persons fails to pay proper attention and to use due diligence in foreseeing the injury or damage impending to be caused
LACK OF FORESIGHT
usually involves negligence
LACK OF SKILL
usually involves imprudence
VOLUNTARY ACT OR OMISSION
DOLO OR MALICE REQUISITES
MISTAKE OF FACT
is a misapprehension of fact on the part of the person who caused injury to another.
not criminally liable as he did not act with criminal intent
REQUISITES FOR MISTAKE OF FACT AS A DEFENSE
CRIMINAL INTENT REPLACED BY NEGLIGENCE
when committed by means of culpa
requisites:
MALA IN SE
criminal acts that are wrong because they violate the moral, public, or natural principles of a society (murder, rape, robbery)
penalized by RPC
MALA PROHIBITA
criminal acts that are wrong because they violate a statute or law rather than being an action that harms or offends society (parking violation, tax fraud, copyright violation)
acts made criminal by special laws
INTENT V. MOTIVE
intent
the purpose to use a particular means to effect such result
motive
moving power which impels one to action for a definite result, not an essential element of crime
MOTIVE RELEVANCE
IANC I = dentity of the accused A = ntagonistic theories N = o eyewitnesses C = circumstantial evidence of sufficient evidence
IDENTITY OF THE ACCUSED
a. Proof of motive is not necessary to pin a crime on the accused if the commission of the crime has been proven and the evidence of identification is convincing.
b. When identity of person accused is in dispute, the motive is very relevant.
c. Motive is essential when there is doubt as to the identity of the assailant.
d. When the defendant admits the killing, inquiring for the motive is no longer necessary.
e. When there is no longer doubt that the defendant was the culprit, it becomes unimportant to know the exact purpose for the crime.
ANTAGONISTIC THEORIES
Motive is important in ascertaining the truth between two antagonistic theories or versions of the killing
NO EYEWITNESSES
Where there are no eyewitness or suspicion is likely to fall upon a number of persons, motive is significant
CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
a. If evidence is merely circumstantial, proof of motive is essential.
b. Proof of motive is not indispensable where guilty is otherwise established by sufficient evidence.