Para 1
Whenever a court has knowledge of an act which it may deem proper to repress and which is not punishable by law, it shall render the proper decision and shall report to the Chief Executive, through the Department of Justice, the reasons which induce the court to believe that said act should be made the subject of penal legislation.
Requisites of Para 1 (act that should be repressed)
Para 2
In the same way the court shall submit to the Chief Executive, through the Department of Justice, such statement as may be deemed proper, without suspending the execution of the sentence, when a strict enforcement of the provisions of this Code would result in the imposition of a clearly excessive penalty, taking into consideration the degree of malice and injury caused by the offense.
Requisites of Para. 2 (excessive punishment)
How do you ascertain that a penalty is excessive?
a. ) less degree of malice;
b. ) no injury/ lesser injury
In Para. 1, why should the court dismiss the case?
Art. 21; “Nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege” (no crime in the absence of law punishing it)
In Para. 1, what is the “proper decision”?
Dismissal of the case AND the acquittal of the accused.
In Para. 2, why should the court continue to execute the punishment when it finds it excessive?
“Dura Lex, Sed Lex”
Court is only concerned with the enforcement and application of the law. The wisdom of the law and it’s effectivity lies within the legislative (enactment), and executive (veto).
What are the remedies for excessive penalties?
a. ) Amendments (by congress)
b. ) Clemency (by the executive)
There are no excessive penalties to ____________.
Public policy (mala prohibitum)
Article 21
No felony shall be punished by any penalty not prescribed prior to its commission.