Assessing qualitative data Flashcards

(19 cards)

1
Q

prolonged engagement

A

-investment of sufficient time collecting data to have an in depth understanding of culture, langa=uage or views of people under study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

reflexivity

A

-awareness of biases brought to study by researcher
-involves attending continually to the researchers effect on collection, analysis and interpretation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

audio recordings and verbatim interviews

A

-ensure to the reader the words fo participants are being reported exacrlt how they said them
-researchers are not adding to or minimizng response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

saturation of data

A

when themes and categories are recurring and no new info can be gathered through data collection
-addition of participants to study until they obtained similar responses from all participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

data triagnulation

A

multiple data sources for the purpose of validating conclusions
-time - collect at different points in time
-space - collect data at multiple sites
-person - multiple perspectives of phenomena

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

audit trail

A

-systematic collection of materials that would allow an independent auditor to draw conclusions about data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

method triangulation

A

-multiple methods of data collection
-opportunity to evaluate that the description of phenomenon is consistent and coherent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

investigator triangulation

A

-2+ researchers for data collection, coding and analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

triangulation purpose

A

-there are multiple ways to learn about truth
-overcome biases that come from single observer and single theory studies
-can also help make a more conceptualized picture of pehnomena under study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

member checking

A

-researchers give participants feedback about emerging interpretations
-participants should have opportunity to assess and validate whether researchers interpration of their realities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

disconfirming or negative cases

A

-purposive/theoretical sampling
-search for data that challenges categorization or explanation that emerged early in analysis
-research sear for cases that appear to disconfirm analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

peer debriefing

A

-validation in face to face sessions with peers to review aspet of inquiry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

thick description

A

-thorough vivid description of research
-context, study participant, events, experiences observed during the inquiry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

researcher credibility

A

-researchers qualifications, experience and reflexivity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

evocative writing

A

way of constructung research texts that conjure arouse or elicit vivd images deep meanings and intense emotions
-imagery, meaning emotion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

credibility

A

-researchers gain credibility by establishing confidence in the truth of their findings
-creditibility is enhanced by data saturation because collecting all revelant data increases the believability of study

17
Q

transferability

A

-transferability allows ths study dindings to be applied to other settings or groups
-through reaching data saturation researches have enoug data that others shoul dbe able to apply the data to other contexts

18
Q

decision trail

A

-outlines the decisions the researchers made when collecting and categorizing data to improve credibility of research

19
Q

authenticity

A

-the extent to which qualitative researchers fairly and faithfully show a range of different realities in the collection analysis and interpretation of their data