Attachment - P1 Flashcards

(173 cards)

1
Q

What is the definition of animal studies?

A
  1. Studies carried out on non-human animal species rather than humans, either for ethical or practical reasons.
  2. Ethical reasons: Separating human infants from their parents is not moral.
  3. Practical reasons: Animals breed faster, and researchers are interested in seeing results across more than one generation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the definition of imprinting?

A
  1. Where offspring follow the first large-moving object they see.
  2. Lorenz’s study.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the definition of contact comfort?

A
  1. The physical and emotional comfort that infants derive from being in close physical contact with their caregiver, particularly in terms of touch and warmth.
  2. Harlow’s study.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the definition of attachment?

A
  1. Strong emotional bond between an infant and caregiver.
  2. It goes both ways.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What have animal studies looked at?

A
  1. The formation of early bonds between non-human parents and their offspring.
  2. This Interest psychologists because attachment-like behaviour is common to a range of species - animal studies can help to understand human attachment.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the Aim of Lorenz’s study?

A
  1. To investigate the idea of imprinting and goslings’ attachment to caregivers.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the Procedure of Lorenz’s study?

A
  1. Lorenz randomly divided a clutch of goose eggs.
  2. Half the eggs were hatched with the mother goose in their natural environment, where the first moving object that they saw was the mother.
  3. The other half hatched in an incubator, where the first moving object that they saw was Lorenz.
  4. Lorenz then marked the two groups and put all the goslings back together in an opaque box.
  5. He then lifted the box up and recorded their behaviour.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the Findings of Lorenz’s study?

A
  1. Once the goslings had hatched, they proceeded to follow the first moving object that they saw between 13 and 16 hours after hatching.
  2. After the two groups were placed in the box, the control group continued to follow the mother, and the experimental group followed Lorenz.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the Conculsions of Lorenz’s study?

A
  1. Lorenz identified a critical period in which imprinting needs to take place. Depending on the species this can be as brief as a few hours after hatching, or birth.
  2. If imprinting does not occur within that time, Lorenz found that chicks did not attach themselves to a mother figure.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is sexual imprinting?

A
  1. He also investigated the relationship between imprinting and adult mate preference - he observed that birds that imprinted on a human would often display courtship behaviour towards humans.
  2. Case study: Lorenz described a peacock that lived in a reptile house of a zoo where the first moving objects the peacock saw after hatching were giant tortoises - As an adult, this bird would only direct courtship behaviour towards giant tortoises.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the implication of Lorenz’s study?

A
  1. Organisms have a biological tendency to form attachments to one single individual - supports the view that attachment has an adaptive, survival-promoting basis.
  2. This is shown by how goslings imprint within minutes of hatching due to their immediate mobility.
  3. The longevity (long-lasting) of the goslings’ bond with Lorenz also suggests that early attachment experiences can predict later bonds.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why don’t babies imprint?

A
  1. Human babies are born immobile and therefore there is less need for them to imprint or form an attachment straight away.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is one strength of Lorenz’s study? (Not high internal validity)

A
  1. Lorenz’s research has been used by other researchers.
  2. His findings gave Bowlby the idea of the critical and sensitive period in his work on monotropy and the maternal deprivation hypothesis - shows how Lorenz’s research has been applied to human attachment.
  3. Applicability in GRAVE.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is another strength of Lorenz’s study? (Not ‘been applied to human attachment’)

A
  1. Lorenz controlled the IV of how the goslings hatched - the gosling’s behaviour was caused by the change in the IV, rather than by other factors.
  2. Lorenz’s research has high internal validity (Within the study itself)
  3. Validity in GRAVE.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is one limitation of Lorenz’s study? (Not low external validity)

A
  1. There are extrapolation (Guess or predict unknown situations) issues with animal studies - the way a human infant develops an attachment is very different to the way geese form an attachment.
  2. Geese are highly mobile from birth so need to be able to follow their mother for survival, whereas human infants are not as mobile at birth and so have no reason to imprint.
  3. Generalisability in GRAVE.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is another limitation of Lorenz’s study? (Not extrapolation issues)

A
  1. Lorenz conducted his research in controlled, artificial settings - separating geese from their natural environment.
  2. These artificial conditions do not reflect the geese’s natural behaviours or interactions with their real environment - the findings might not apply to how geese behave in the wild.
  3. Lorenz’s research has low external validity (Outside the study)
  4. Validity in GRAVE.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What was Harlow’s research on?

A
  1. He worked with rhesus monkeys which are more like humans than Lorenz’s geese - monkeys and humans share a significant portion of DNA (93%), and both exhibit social behaviours such as forming bonds and communicating through facial expressions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is the Aim of Harlow’s research?

A
  1. To investigate the importance of food and contact comfort within attachment.
  2. He also aimed to investigate the effects of early maternal deprivation on later social and emotional development.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What was the Procedure of Harlow’s study?

A
  1. Harlow used two ‘surrogate mothers’. One was made from wire and the other made from wire, but with a soft towel covering.
  2. He then split 16 baby monkeys up into 4 conditions.
  3. In each condition, the baby monkey was placed in a cage with one or two ‘mothers’.
  4. The amount of time spent with each mother was recorded.
  5. In certain conditions, a loud noise was blasted, and a ‘robot’ moved to test for mother preference during stress.
  6. The long-term effects of the maternal deprivation with reference to aggression, sociability, mating and parenting was also recorded.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What was the Findings of Harlow’s study?

A
  1. The baby monkeys preferred the soft towel mother, when given the choice, over the wire mother.
  2. This was regardless of who dispensed the milk.
  3. When frightened by the loud noise, the baby monkeys clung to the soft towel mother if it was available.
  4. The baby monkeys with the soft towel mother explored their cage more.
  5. All the monkeys were dysfunctional - They tended to display fear, aggression and did not develop normal social behaviour.
  6. They were deemed ‘unskilled’ at mating and as mothers, some of them neglected their young and others attacked their children, even killing them in some cases.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What was the Conculsions of Harlow’s study?

A
  1. Contact comfort was of more importance to the monkeys than food when it came to attachment behaviour.
  2. Contact comfort was associated with lower levels of stress when scared and an increased willingness to explore.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What did Harlow find about maternally Deprived Monkeys as Adults?

A
  1. All the monkeys were dysfunctional - They tended to display fear, aggression and did not develop normal social behaviour.
  2. They were deemed ‘unskilled’ at mating and as mothers, some of them neglected their young and others attacked their children, even killing them in some cases.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What are the implication of Harlow’s study?

A
  1. He suggested attachment is based on contact comfort rather than feeding, as monkeys preferred a comforting mother even when food was available, contradicting learning theory.
  2. Monkeys raised in isolation developed abnormal social behaviour despite being fed, indicating that healthy development requires more than meeting physical needs.
  3. Since the effects persisted, the research also supports the view that early attachment experiences can shape long-term social functioning.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What did Harlow suggest about the critical period for normal development?

A
  1. Just like Lorenz he suggested a critical period for attachment.
  2. He said that a mother figure had to be introduced to an infant monkey within 90 days for an attachment to form - After this, attachment was impossible and the long-lasting effects were irreversible.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
What is one strength of Harlow's study? (Not high internal validity)
1. His procedure was **standardised** - controlled **all the conditions** and made sure the **same ‘mothers’ were used** for the conditions. 2. This allows his research to be **replicated by other researchers**. 3. **Reliability** in GRAVE.
26
What is another strength of Harlow's study? (Not procedure was standardised)
1. His research has **good internal validity** - **controlled** all his conditions, it can be said that the **monkey’s behaviour** was caused by the **change in the ‘mother’** rather than by other factors. 2. **Validity** in GRAVE.
27
What is one limitation of Harlow's study? (Not extrapolation issues)
1. There were several **ethical issues** involved in his research - monkey’s suffered greatly from **psychological harm**. 2. The monkeys who were **only given the wire ‘mother’** had severe diarrhoea which is a **sign of stress**. 3. Since monkeys are **like humans**, it can be said that their **level of suffering is also similar**. 4. This questions whether the **benefits** of Harlow’s research **outweigh the cost** of the monkey’s health. 5. **Ethics** in GRAVE.
28
What is another limitation of Harlow's study? (Not ethical issues)
1. There are **extrapolation** (Guess or predict **unknown situations**) issues with animal studies - Although humans and monkeys share a **similar genetic make-up**, they are still a **different species with distinct behaviours**. 2. The way a **human infant** develops an attachment could be very **different to the way monkeys do** since humans have more **complex social, emotional, and cognitive needs**. 3. **Generalisability** in GRAVE.
29
What is the definition of learning theory?
1. A set of theories from the **behaviorist approach** that emphasis the **role of learning** in the **formation of behavior**.
30
Who came up with learning theory of attachment?
1. **Dollard and Miller (1950)** 2. Sometimes known as the ‘cupboard love’ theory because it emphasizes **importance of the caregiver as a provider of food**. 3. Proposed that children learn to love **whoever feeds them**.
31
What is the behaviorist approach?
1. All babies are a **blank slate** - their behavior is **learnt**.
32
What is the definition of classical conditioning?
1. A type of learning in which an **existing involuntary** reflex response is associated with a **new stimulus**.
33
What is the definition of neutral stimulus?
1. A stimulus that **does not initially** produce a **specific response or reaction** when it is presented. 2. Doesn't trigger a **response**.
34
What is the definition of unconditioned stimulus?
1. A stimulus that is **naturally occurring** and **automatically triggers a response** without any **prior learning or conditioning**. 2. It's **reflexive**.
35
What is the definition of a unconditioned response?
1. A **natural, automatic reaction** to a stimulus that does not require **prior learning or conditioning**. 2. It's **reflexive**.
36
What is the definition of conditioned stimulus?
1. A stimulus that produces a **specific, learned, response or reaction** when it is presented. 2. It's **learnt**.
37
What is the definition of conditioned response?
1. A **learned reaction** to a previously **neutral stimulus** that has become **associated with an unconditioned stimulus**. 2. It's **learnt**.
38
What is the definition of operant conditioning?
1. A type of learning in which a **new voluntary behaviour** is associated with a **consequence**. 2. **Reinforcement** makes the behaviour **more likely** to occur, while **punishment** makes it **less likely** to occur.
39
What does operant condition involve?
1. Learning through **consequences**. 2. If a behaviour produces a **pleasant** consequence, it's **likely to be repeated**. 3. If a behaviour produces an **unpleasant** consequence, it's **less likely to be repeated**. 4. **Reinforcement** of desired behaviour **increases** the likelihood of it.
40
Learning theory diagram.
41
What are the 2 types of reinforcement?
1. Positive reinforcement. 2. Negative reinforcement.
42
What is positive reinforcement?
1. An infant will do a **behaviour again** because they have been **rewarded for that behaviour**. 2. **Crying** is positively reinforced bc it produces a **rewarding outcome** e.g **feeding or comfort**. 3. Over time, they learn to **repeat crying** since it brings **relief/reward**, ***increasing the behaviour***.
43
What is negative reinforcement?
1. An adult will do a behaviour to stop an **unpleasant consequence**. 2. Hearing a **baby cry is unpleasant**, so when a caregiver **responds** e.g. feeding or cuddling, the **crying stops**. 3. This is because the response **removes the unpleasant sound**, the caregiver is **negatively reinforced** and becomes **more likely to respond quickly** in the future to **avoid the crying**.
44
According to learning theory what does mutual reinforcement lead to?
1. **Strengthens an attachment** between infant and caregiver.
45
What is the definition of primary drive?
1. An **innate biological motivator**. 2. Innate = from **birth or inherent** - **hunger** is the first drive.
46
What is the definition of secondary drive?
1. **Motivators** learned through **conditioning or association** with a **primary drive** - attachment and social acceptance.
47
How is attachment as secondary drive?
1. Learning theory also uses **drive reduction** (people are motivated to act to *reduce internal, tension-producing drives caused by unsatisfied biological needs*) 2. **Hunger is a primary drive** which infants are **motivated to satisfy** to reduce **discomfort**.
48
What did Sears et al. say about attachment as a secondary drive?
1. **Sears et al. (1975)** argued that because caregivers repeatedly provide food, the **relief from hunger becomes associated with the caregiver**. 2. Over time, this pleasure is **generalised to the caregiver**, so attachment becomes a secondary drive learned through this **association between the caregiver and the reduction of a primary drive**.
49
What does classical conditioning involve?
1. Learning to associate **two stimuli together** so an individual begins to respond to them in the **same way**.
50
What is classical conditioning in the case of attachment?
1. **Food** serves as an **UCS**. Being fed gives a baby pleasure. The infant does not have to learn this, it is an **UCR**. 2. A **caregiver** starts as a **NS** but as the caregiver **provides food overtime** they become **associated with food** - the **NS has become the CS**. The sight of the caregiver produces a **CR response**. 3. To the learning theorist, this **conditioned pleasure response is love** - the caregiver becomes an **attachment figure**.
51
What is one strength of learning theory? (Not learning theory involved in explaining attachment)
1. Social learning theory has also made an important contribution to the **original learning approach as an explanation of attachment**. 2. **Hay and Vespo (1988)** suggest that parents teach children to love them by **modelling attachment behaviour and rewarding them** when they display attachment behaviour. 3. This means that learning theory has contributed to **psychologists understanding of attachment**. 4. **Supporting evidence** in SCOUT.
52
What is another strength of learning theory? (Not learning theory contributes to understanding of psychology)
1. Some elements of conditioning could be **involved in attachment behaviour**. 2. Rather than **feeding being the main UCS**, it is probable that association between the **primary caregiver and the provision of comfort and social interaction** is part of what **builds the attachment**. 3. This means that learning theory is **still involved in explaining attachment**. 4. **Usefulness** in SCOUT.
53
What is one limitation of learning theory? (Not Israeli mothers and child on farm)
1. **Animal research** has provided a counter argument for the learning theory of attachment. 2. **Lorenz’s** research on geese showed that they **imprinted on the first moving object** that they saw, not the person who **fed them**. 3. **Harlow’s** research demonstrated **monkeys preferred the cloth mother** rather than the one who **offered food**. 4. This suggests that attachment does **not develop because of feeding**. 5. **Conflicting evidence**in SCOUT.
54
What is another limitation of learning theory? (Not animal studies argument)
1. **Fox (1977)** studied attachment bonds between **mothers, infants and metapelets** (full-time carers of newborn children) on Israeli farms. 2. Children were **more attached to their mothers than the metapelets**, even though the metapelets were the ones that **fed them**. 3. This suggests that the learning theory may not be **valid as an explanation of attachment**. 4. **Conflicting evidence** in SCOUT.
55
What is the definition of monotropy?
1. The idea that infants have an **inbuilt tendency** to make an initial attachment with **one attachment figure** - most commonly the **mother**. 2. **Mono = one**
56
What did Bowlby say about Monotropy?
1. He said that **one attachment is different from all others** and of central importance to the **child’s development**. 2. He called this person the **‘mother’** but was clear that it doesn't need be the **biological mother**.
57
What are Bowlby’s two principles about the quality of attachment, and what do they mean?
1. He said that the **more time spent** with the primary attachment figure, the **better**. 2. ***The law of continuity:*** The more **constant and predictable** a child’s care, the **better the quality of attachment**. 3. ***The law of accumulated separation:*** The impact of **every separation** from the mother figure **adds up**.
58
What is the definition of innate?
1. A behaviour that is **instinctive** and does **not need to be learned**.
59
What is the definition of internal working model?
1. A mental representation that is used as a **template for future relationships** based on an infant’s **primary attachment**. 2. E.g. what **relationships are like** + guides **expectations about the self** (e.g. ‘am I lovable?’) and **others** (e.g. ‘are people reliable?’).
60
What are some examples of how the internal working model may differ?
1. **Sensitive and consistent care** is likely to produce expectations that others are **trustworthy** and that the self is **worthy of care**, which supports **healthier relationships in adulthood**. 2. **Rejecting or inconsistent care** may lead to **expectations of poor treatment**, which can contribute to **difficulties in later relationships**.
61
What did Bowlby say about the IWM affecting later parenting?
1. Adults often **base their own caregiving on their early experiences**. 2. This helps explain why **patterns of attachment and family functioning** can be **intergenerational**.
62
What is the definition of social releasers?
1. **Innate behaviours** shown by an infant that **cause a caregiving response** (e.g. cooing)
63
What did Bowlby say about social releasers in babies?
1. He suggested that babies are born with a set of **'cute’ behaviours** like **smiling and cooing** that encourage **attention from adults** - this is to activate **adult attachment systems** and make an adult **attach to the baby**. 2. He recognised attachment is a **reciprocal process**. Both caregiver and baby have an **innate predisposition** to become attached and **social releasers are hard wired** in the infants, to **trigger responses** in caregivers.
64
What is the definition of critical period?
1. A **specific time period** within which an attachment **must form**, if it is to form at all.
65
What did Bowlby say about the critical and sensitive period?
1. He initially proposed a critical period of about 6 months, during which an attachment needed to form or it wouldn't form at all. 2. He later reframed this as a sensitive period - infants are **most receptive** to forming attachments **early on**, but an attachment can still develop later, just with **greater difficulty**. 3. He said the sensitive period could extend to around **30 months**.
66
What is the definition of sensitive period?
1. The **best time** for attachments to form. They can **still form outside of this period** but with more **difficulty**.
67
What did Bowlby say about the learning theory of attachment?
1. **Rejected** the learning theory of attachment, stating that ‘if it were true, an infant of a **year or two should take readily to whomever feeds them** and this is clearly not the case'. 2. He looked at the work of **Lorenz and Harlow** and proposed an **evolutionary theory of attachment**.
68
How does the IWM and Bowlby monotropic theory link?
1. The **quality of the monotropic attachment shapes the IWM**. 2. From the primary attachment, the child **develops an IWM**, showing how the **quality of the first attachment** influences later **social and emotional behavior**.
69
What is the evolutionary explanation of attachment?
1. Bowlby suggests attachment is an **innate, biologically based** system that provides a **survival advantage**. 2. Both **imprinting in animals and human attachment** are thought to have evolved bc they **keep young close to caregivers**, increasing **protection from dangers**. 3. Bowlby argued that in the **environment of evolutionary adaptedness** infants who stayed **near caregivers were more likely to survive and reproduce**. 4. Attachment behaviours were **favoured by natural selection**, meaning infants are genetically **predisposed to show innate behaviours**, such as crying, that **elicit caregiving**. 5. He called these behaviors **social releasers**.
70
What is one strength of monotropy? (Not 99 mothers)
1. If Bowlby is correct then it is a useful idea because it clarifies the **importance of mothers and mothering**. 2. **Before** Bowlby, people did not think the **mother's role was important** and many divorces were settled in **favour of the father** because mothers were **not regarded as necessary**. 3. **After** Bowlby, it became common to recognise that **children's wellbeing** is closely tied to their **relationship with their mother**. 4. This influenced legal decisions in favour of maternal custody in many cases. 5. **Usefulness** in SCOUT.
71
What is another strength of monotropy? (Not changes in court)
1. **Bailey et al. (2007)** assessed **99 mothers with one-year-old babies** - asked the mothers about the **quality of their attachments to their own mothers**, then the attachments of the **babies to the mothers**. 2. They found that mothers with **poor attachments to their own mothers** were more likely to have **babies with insecure attachments**. 3. This supports Bowlby’s monotropic theory because it shows that the **quality of the primary attachment has long-term developmental consequences**, highlighting its special importance. 4. **Supporting evidence** in SCOUT.
72
What is one limitation of monotropy? (Not different attachments for different purposes)
1. **Schaffer and Emerson’s (1964)** study demonstrated that a significant **minority of children** were able to form **multiple attachments** with caregivers even though they did **not have ‘one special bond’**. 2. Goes against the idea that there is **one specific attachment** which is **more unique and special than all others**. 3. Questions the **validity** of Bowlby’s monotropic theory. 4. **Conflicting evidence** in SCOUT.
73
What is another limitation of monotropy? (Not minority of children)
1. **Lamb et al. (1982)** studied the attachments infants had with people like **fathers, grandparents and siblings** and found that infants had **different attachments for different purposes**. 2. This demonstrated that infants do **not treat attachments as a hierarchy**. 3. E.g. infants go to **fathers for play**, but **mothers for comfort**. This goes **against Bowlby’s idea of monotropy**. 4. **Conflicting evidence** in SCOUT.
74
What is the definition of Strange Situation?
1. A **controlled observation** designed to test **attachment security**. 2. Infants are assessed on their response to playing in an **unfamiliar room, being left alone, left with a stranger, and being reunited with a caregiver**.
75
What is the definition of secure attachment?
1. The **most desired** attachment type and associated with **psychologically healthy outcomes**. 2. In SS, shown by ***moderate*** **stranger and separation anxiety**, and being **easily comforted at reunion**.
76
What is the definition of insecure-**avoid**ant attachment?
1. An attachment type characterised by **low anxiety but ‘weak’ attachment**. 2. In SS, shown by **low stranger and separation anxiety**, and **little response at reunion**. 3. Infant just **doesn't care**.
77
What is the definition of insecure-**resist**ant attachment?
1. An attachment type characterised by a **strong attachment and high anxiety**. 2. In SS, shown by **high levels of stranger and separation anxiety**, and by **resistance to being comforted** at reunion. 3. Infant cares **too much/extreme**.
78
What is the definition of proximity seeking behaviour?
1. The way infants try to maintain **physical contact or be close** to their attachment figure.
79
What is the definition of stranger anxiety?
1. The degree of **distress** shown by an infant when with **unfamiliar people**.
80
What is the definition of separation anxiety?
1. The degree of **distress** shown by the child when **separated from the caregiver**.
81
What is the definition of exploration behaviour?
1. How the child **explores** the environment when the **caregiver is present**.
82
What is the definition of secure-base behaviour?
1. The child **returning to the caregiver for comfort** during **stressful or unfamiliar** situations.
83
What is the definition of reunion behaviour?
1. The way a child responds when they are **reunited with their primary caregiver** after being **briefly separated**.
84
What is Mary Ainsworth known for?
1. Designing a **standardised procedure** to assess **infant–caregiver attachment quality**, called the Strange Situation. 2. Still widely used today to observe how infants respond to **separation and reunion**, indicating the **security and strength** of the attachment.
85
What was the research design of SS?
1. The Strange Situation is a **controlled, overt, non-participant observation** that is used to assess the -**quality of a child’s attachment** to their caregiver.
86
What is the **A**im of Ainsworth's study?
1. To observe **key attachment behaviours** as a means of assessing the **quality of a child’s attachment**.
87
What was the **P**rocedure of Ainsworth's study?
1. **100 middle-class American** infants and mothers were used in the study. 2. Every aspect of behaviour was **observed** and the observations were **recorded**. 3. She used **five categories**: **proximity** seeking behaviour, **exploration and secure-base** behaviour, **stranger** anxiety, **separation** anxiety, and **reunion** behaviour. 4. Every **15 seconds**, the category of behaviour displayed was **recorded and scored on a scale between 1 – 5**. 5. It consisted of **eight episodes**. 6. All lasted about **three minutes**, apart from **episode one which lasted about one minute**.
88
What was the **F**indings of Ainsworth's study?
1. Generally, all infants explored room **more enthusiastically** when **just mother** was present, as opposed to when the **stranger was there, or the mother left**. 2. Ainsworth found that there were **distinct patterns** in the way that infants behaved. She identified three main types of attachment. 3. **20-25%** = Insecure-Avoidant, **65-70%** = Secure, **10-15%** = Insecure-Resistant 4. Caregivers who were **indifferent** to infants needs = **Insecure-Avoidant**, Caregivers who were **sensitive** to infants needs = **Secure**, Caregivers who were **Inconsistent** to infants needs = **Insecure-Resistant**.
89
What was the **C**onculsions of Ainsworth's study?
1. A child’s attachment style is largely shaped by the **caregiver's responsiveness to the infant’s needs**.
90
What is one strength of Strange Situation? (Not standardised script)
1. Widely recognised as a **cornerstone of attachment theory** - Psychologists use the Strange Situation to determine the **type of attachment** a child has to a caregiver. 2. It continues to be influential in **developmental psychology** e.g. a child displaying **insecure attachments** might indicate a history of **trauma or abuse**. 3. This can lead to **further clinical evaluation** and allows **interventions** to be put in place. 4. **Applicability** in GRAVE.
91
What is another strength of Strange Situation? (Not cornerstone of attachment)
1. The procedure is highly standardised. 2. The Strange Situation consisted of **eight episodes**. Each of these lasted about **three minutes**, apart from **episode one** which lasted about **one minute**. The **precise nature** has allowed the method to be used to categorise **infant attachment in many studies**. 3. **Reliability** in GRAVE.
92
What is one limitation of Strange Situation? (Not culturally bias)
1. An **artificial way** of assessing attachment, as it is **controlled** with the mother and stranger acting to a **‘script’**. 2. The artificial nature of the procedure could **influence the infant’s behaviour** and may **not reflect** natural attachment types. 3. Some researchers argue that the situation itself is **too stressful and does not provide an accurate reflection** of how attachment behaviours manifest in **everyday life**. 4. **Validity** in GRAVE.
93
What is another limitation of Strange Situation? (Not lack of mundane realism)
1. Restricted to **100 middle-class Americans** and their infants, so it is unlikely that the findings would be **representative of the wider population**. 2. In other countries, child-rearing practices + attachment behaviours may **differ**. 3. E.g. in some countries, children may **not experience separation** from their caregivers in the same way or may be **less distressed** by it bc of **different childrearing practices**. 4. **Generalisability** in GRAVE.
94
What is one strength of types of attachment? (Not good inter-observer reality)
1. It's strongly predictive of **later development**. 2. Infants assessed as **secure**, typically go on to have better outcome in life e.g. **success** at school, **romantic relationships** and **friendships** in adulthood. 3. **Insecure-resistant** attachment is associated with the **worst outcomes** e.g. bullying in **later childhood** (**Kokkinos, 2007**) and adult **mental health** problems (**Ward et al., 2006**) 4. This demonstrates the importance of early attachment types on the development of future attachments. 5. **Usefulness** in SCOUT.
95
What is another strength of types of attachment? (Not predicts later relationship)
1. Shows **good inter-rater reliability** as different observers watching the same children **agree on what attachment type** to classify them as. 2. May be because the SS takes place under **controlled conditions** and the behavioural categories are **easy to observe**. 3. **Bick (2012)** found agreement on the attachment types for **94% of babies tested** - attachment types identified by Ainsworth are not influenced by **individual bias or subjective interpretation**. 4. This consistency increases the accuracy and trustworthiness of the original attachment types. 5. **Testability** in SCOUT.
96
What is one limitation of types of attachment? (Not Japanese mothers)
1. There is at least **one more attachment type** - **Main and Solomon (1986)** pointed out that a minority of children display **atypical attachments** that do not reflect **Type A, B or C** behaviour. 2. This is commonly known as **‘disorganised attachment’** (display a mix of **resistant and avoidant behaviour**) - says that the original findings from the SS were **inaccurate and invalid**. 3. **Usefulness + Conflicting evidence** in SCOUT.
97
What is another limitation of types of attachment? (Not at least one more attachment type)
1. May not have the same meaning in countries outside of **Western Europe and America**. 2. **Takahashi (1990)** noted that the procedure does not really work in Japan because** Japanese mothers are so rarely separated** from their babies that there are very **high levels of separation anxiety**. 3. **Cultural differences** in childhood are likely to mean that children **respond differently** to the SS - infants from different cultures cannot be classified **correctly into an attachment type**. So, would be **inappropriate to use thE **SS to do this. 4. **Conflicting evidence** in SCOUT.
98
What is the definition of cultural variations?
1. The difference in **norms and values** that exist between **people in different groups**.
99
What is the definition of meta-analysis?
1. Where researchers **combine the findings** from multiple studies to draw an **overall conclusion**.
100
What do psychologists want to find out about attachment across cultures?
1. They know that **child-rearing practices vary** across cultures - want to see if this impacts the **proportion of attachment types** across different countries. 2. Attachment may be largely **universal**, or patterns may differ depending on **cultural values**.
101
How can cultural differences impact how attachment behaviours are interpreted and valued?
1. **Reebye et al. (2014)** reported that in **Britain**, **insecure-avoidant** behaviour is often viewed **negatively** as reflecting a **weak attachment**. 2. But, in cultures that **value independence** (**Germany**) the same behaviour may be seen as **more desirable because it fits socialisation goals**. 3. This suggests that what **counts as ‘secure’** behaviour may not have the **same meaning in every culture**.
102
What is the **A**im of Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg's study?
1. Assess **similarities and differences** in the amount of Type **A, B and C classifications** across countries. 2. Assess the **extent of inter-** (**between**) and **intra-** (**within**) **cultural differences** in attachment types of different countries.
103
What was the **P**rocedure of Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg's study?
1. A meta-analysis of **32 studies from 8 countries** that all tested mother-infant attachment types using the Strange Situation. 2. There were **1,990 results** from infants. 3. All studies comprised of at least **35 mother-infant pairs** and used infants aged **two years or younger**.
104
What was the **F**indings of Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg's study?
1. **Secure attachment was the most common**. 2. But proportions varied from **75% in Britain** to **50% in China**. 3. **Individualistic cultures:** insecure-resistant attachment were the **least common**, but **collectivist samples** (China, Japan, Israel): **above 25%**. 4. There was a **higher variations** within the **same country** (**150% greater**) than those **between different countries**. 5. E.g. in the US, one study found **46% of infants** were securely attached compared to one of **90%**.
105
What was the **C**onclusion of Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg's study?
1. **Secure attachment** is the **most common** - supports the idea that attachment is a **universal, biologically** based system. 2. However, the distribution of **insecure types varies between cultures** - **cultural child-rearing practices** shape how **attachment is expressed**.
106
What is a strength of Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg's study? (Not how attachment vary across cultures)
1. The meta-analysis there were nearly **2000 babies** - increases **internal validity**, by reducing the impact of **anomalous results** caused by **participant variables**. 2. Includes data from a **wide range of cultures**, such as **Western** (U.S, U.K) and **non-Western countries** (Japan, Israel, China) - generalise the findings **across different cultures**. 3. **Generalisability** in GRAVE.
107
What is another strength of Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg's study? (Not generalisable across cultures)
1. Insights into how attachment styles **vary across cultures**. 2. Insecure-avoidant attachments were **highest in Germany** (**35%**) compared to other countries (varied between **5 and 26%**). 3. E.g. **Reebye et al. (2014)** found that in **Britain**, an **insecure-avoidant** attachment is seen as a **weak attachment**. But, in **Germany** it's viewed as **promoting independence**. 4. **Applicability** in GRAVE.
108
What is a limitation of Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg's study?
1. Since the Strange situation procedure is **culturally bias**, this study is too - based on **Western cultures** (**short separations** and **brief interactions with strangers**) 2. Doesn't accurately assess **attachment behaviour** across cultures. E.g in cultures where **child and mother are rarely separated** (Japan), or where they are **raised in a communal environment** (Israel). 3. This could result in the **misclassification** of attachment types. 4. **Validity** in GRAVE.
109
What was Simonella et al. (2014) study about?
1. A study in Italy to see if the **proportions** of infants with different attachment types **matched previous studies**. 2. They assessed **76, 12-month-old** infants using the **Strange Situation**. 3. Found **50% = secure** and **36% = insecure-avoidant** - **lower rate of secure** and **higher rate of insecure-avoidant** than has been found in other studies. 4. They suggest this is bc there are an **increasing number of mothers** of very young children that **work long hours** and use **professional childcare**. 5. Suggest that patterns of attachment types are **not static** but **vary in line with cultural change**.
110
What was Jin et al. (2014) study about?
1. Wanted to **compare** the proportions of attachment types in **Korea to other studies** - Strange Situation was used to assess **87 children**. 2. The proportions of **insecure and secure children were similar** to all other countries - more were classified as **insecure-resistant**, only **one child was avoidant** (Similar to the **Japan study** with Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg) 3. In **collectivist cultures** (Korea and Japan) caregiving emphasizes **close proximity, high responsiveness, and interdependence** between infant and caregiver. 4. Jin concluded that **cultural practices** influence the way **attachment types are expressed**. E.g. **high secure and low insecure-avoidant** attachment in Korean may reflect the fact that caregiving norms promote **availability and emotional closeness** - makes **avoidant behaviors** less likely to develop.
111
What is a strength of cultural variations? (Not indigenous researchers)
1. **Posada and Jacobs (2011)** argue there is evidence for **underlying universal principles** of attachment - Caregiving sensitivity. 2. Cross-cultural findings from a range of differing countries suggest that **caregiver sensitivity** is consistently associated with **secure attachment** - even if the **expression** of sensitive caregiving or the **behaviour** of secure children differ **responsiveness appears to be similar**. 3. This helps identify what is **universal in attachment** while separating it from **culturally specific** behavioural expressions. 4. **Supporting evidence** in SCOUT.
112
What is another strength of cultural variations? (Not underlying universal principle)
1. Research that looks at cultural variations in attachment include research conducted by **indigenous researchers** (**same cultural background** as the participants). 2. E.g. **Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg** included research by **German and Japanese teams**. 3. Potential problems can be **avoided** (**misinterpretation** of language and **communication barriers**) 4. By removing these issues, the **validity is improved**. 5. **Usefulness** in SCOUT.
113
What is a limitation of cultural variations? (Not Aboriginal Australian families)
1. Attachment may **not be purely innate** - Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg suggested some **similarities could reflect globalization**. E.g. the spread of **parenting ideas through media.** 2. If caregivers across different cultures are exposed to **similar messages about ‘good parenting’**, behaviour may become **more alike**, producing **similar attachment patterns**. 3. So, **similarities** might be bc of a **shared global media culture** rather than **universal biological influences alone**. 4. **Opposing evidence** in SCOUT.
114
What is another limitation of cultural variations? (Not shared global media culture)
1. **Malin (1997)** found that in some **Aboriginal Australian communities**, children are **discouraged from exploring**, so they stay **close to their caregiver** rather than using them as a **secure base**. 2. In the SS this could be **misinterpreted as insecurity**, so infants may be **misclassified** - may not be **fully generalisable** as they reflect **Western expectations** about independence. 3. Some researchers argue that **cultures may require culture-specific classifications** (or adapted measures) to categorise attachment in a valid way. 4. **Usefulness** in SCOUT.
115
What is the definition of maternal depravation?
1. An explanation of the **emotional and intellectual consequences** of **disrupting attachment bonds** that sees **serious, permanent damage** to children’s development.
116
What are 2 effects of maternal deprivation?
1. Intellectual Development 2. Emotional Development
117
What did Bowlby say the effects of maternal deprivation had on a child's intellectual development?
1. If children were deprived of maternal care for too long during the critical period, they would suffer **delayed intellectual development**, characterised by an **abnormally low IQ**. 2. **Goldfarb (1943)** followed the development of **30 orphaned children** until they were **12 years old** - **half** had been **fostered by 4 months** and the **other half** were in an **orphanage**. 3. At **12**, their **IQ was assessed** using the Stanford-Binet test - **Fostered group:** average IQ of **96**, **Orphanage group:** averaged IQ of **68**. 4. This shows that if children are **maternally deprived during the critical period**, it can impact their **intellectual development**.
118
What did Bowlby say the effects of maternal deprivation had on a child's emotional development?
1. There is a risk of **affectionless psychopathy** developing - personality style including a **lack of empathy for others** and a **lack of shame or sense of responsibility**. 2. Such individuals **act on impulse** with **little regard for the consequences**. E.g. showing **no guilt for antisocial behaviour**.
119
What is the definition of separation?
1. **Short-term disruption** of an attachment bond. 2. E.g. **day-care, being left with a babysitter or family member**. 3. Brief separations, particularly if a **substitute caregiver** is present, are **not significant for development**.
120
What is the definition of depravation?
1. **Long-term disruption** of an attachment bond with **no substitute caregiver**. 2. E.g. **parental death, long-term separation (imprisonment), divorce, and in some cases severe **parental mental health difficulties** (**Post-partum psychosis/depression**) if the caregiver is **consistently emotionally unavailable**.
121
What did Bifulco et al. (1992) study involve?
1. Studied women who had experienced **separation from their mothers** due to **maternal death**. 2. Found **25%** experienced **depression or an anxiety** compared with **15%** with **no early loss**. 3. These problems were **greatest** when the loss occurred **before age 6**, supporting Bowlby’s view that **early deprivation** is more harmful.
122
What is the definition of critical period?
1. A **specific time period** within which an **attachment must form**, if it is to **form at all**.
123
What is the definition of affectionless psychopathy?
1. A term used by **Bowlby** to describe people who do **not show concern or affection** for other people and show **no, or very little, remorse or guilt**.
124
What did Bowlby suggest a child need for a healthy emotional and intellectual development?
1. Infants need **continuous warm, sensitive care** from a mother or permanent mother-substitute. 2. Argued that **prolonged separation** from this attachment figure (especially when there is **no adequate substitute**) can lead to **maternal deprivation** - increasing the **risk of long-term emotional and cognitive** difficulties.
125
What did Bowlby say about the critical period for development?
1. The **first 30 months** were a particularly important period for development, with a **continuing risk of harm** up to around age **5**. 2. Believed that **prolonged separation** during this window, without suitable alternative care, could cause **serious and potentially long-lasting** damage.
126
What was the **A**im of Bowlby's 44 thieves study? (Can be used as a strength for MD)
1. To investigate whether the **causes of juvenile delinquency** could be **linked to maternal deprivation**.
127
What was the **P**rocedure of Bowlby's 44 thieves study? (Can be used as a strength for MD)
1. Between **1936 and 1939**, an opportunity sample of **88 children** was selected from the clinic where Bowlby worked. 2. **44 were juvenile thieves** (**31 boys and 13 girls**) who had been referred to him because of their **stealing**. 3. The other **44 children** (**34 boys and 10 girls**) became the **control group** who had been referred bc of their **emotional problems**. 4. The two groups were **matched on their age and IQ** - Matched Pairs Design. 5. The children and parents were interviewed to record **details of the child’s early life** (periods of **separation** and instances of **affectionless psychopathy**) by a **psychiatrist, a psychologist, and a social worker**. 6. They all made **separate reports** - inter-observer reliability.
128
What was the **F**indings of Bowlby's 44 thieves study? (Can be used as a strength for MD)
1.**14 of the thieves** = **affectionless psychopaths**. **12 of the 14** had **prolonged separation** of more than six months from their mothers in their **first two years of life**. 2. **5** of the 30 ‘thieves’ **not classified as affectionless psychopaths** had experienced **separations**. 3. In the **control group**, only **2 experienced prolonged separations**, and **none** were classified as **‘affectionless psychopaths’**.
129
What was the **C**onclusion of Bowlby's 44 thieves study? (Can be used as a strength for MD)
1. The results **support** Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation. 2. They show **86%** of the children classified as **affectionless psychopaths** had experienced **prolonged separation** from their primary caregiver during the **critical period**.
130
What is a strength of maternal depravation?
1. It led to **major changes** in the way children are **cared for in hospitals** - at least **one caregiver** is encouraged to **stay** and there is greater **flexibility** in terms of **visiting hours for other adults**. 2. Been applied to **childrearing practices** to prevent any **negative consequences** bc of the **breaking of the attachment bond**. 3. **Usefulness** in SCOUT.
131
What is a limitation of maternal depravation? (Not prolonged separation doesn't predict criminality)
1. **Individual differences** may influence how **well children cope** with separation. 2. **Barrett (1997)** found that children who were **more emotionally mature** adjusted **better to separation** - suggests separation does **not affect all children the same way**, distress is partly explained by the **child’s characteristics** rather than **separation alone**. 3. May be **limited** bc it may **not apply universally** and may **overestimate** the inevitability of **negative outcomes**. 4. **Opposing evidence** in SCOUT.
132
What is another limitation of maternal depravation? (Not individual differences)
1. There is **counterevidence** challenging this theory. 2. **Lewis (1954)** partially **replicated the 44 Thieves** research on a larger sample (around **500 young people**) and found that **prolonged early separation** from the mother did **not inevitably** predict later **criminality** or difficulties forming **close relationships**. 3. Suggests Bowlby **overstated the severity and inevitability** of the outcomes (**affectionless psychopathy**) and that the effects of **early separation** are likely influenced by **other factors** (child’s **temperament**, the **availability/quality** of substitute care, and later **supportive relationships**) 4. **Conflicting evidence** in SCOUT.
133
What is the definition of Institutionalisation?
1. The **effects** of living in an institutional setting such as a **hospital or care home**. 2. It is a place where **children live for long, continuous periods** of time and **little to no emotional care** is provided.
134
What is the definition of privation?
1. An attachment bond was **never formed**.
135
What is the definition of orphan studies?
1. These concern children placed **in care** because their **parents cannot look after them**.
136
What is the definition of disinhibited attachment?
1. Behaviour that is **attention seeking and clingy** and directed **indiscriminately towards all adults**.
137
How can maternal deprivation be investigated?
1. Through **research on institutional care**, where children often experience a **lack of consistent, sensitive caregiving**. 2. Much of what we know about institutionalisation comes from studies of **Romanian orphanages** from the **late 20th century** onwards, when **large numbers of children** were raised in **severely deprived institutions** with limited **social and emotional care**.
138
What are the effects of institutionalisation?
1. It can often lead to long-term **psychological, emotional, and social** consequences. 2. Negatively impact **cognition and emotional development**, often creating **maladaptive** (not adjusting **adequately or appropriately**) behaviours.
139
What are 4 examples of the effect on institutionalisation?
1. Physical underdevelopment 2. Disinhibited attachment 3. Intellectual disability 4. Poor parenting
140
What does physical underdevelopment involve?
1. Children in institutional care are usually **physically small**. 2. Research has shown that **lack of emotional care**, rather than poor nourishment, is the cause of what has been called **‘deprivation dwarfism’**.
141
What does disinhibited attachment involve?
1. Its a a typical **effect of spending time** in an institution. 2. Children are **equally friendly** towards **people they know** or those who are **strangers**. 3. This is highly **unusual behaviour** as children usually show **stranger anxiety** in their **second year of life**.
142
What does intellectual disability involve?
1. **Cognitive development** is affected by **emotional development**. 2. In **Rutter’s ERA** study, most children showed signs of **intellectual disability** when they arrived in **Britain**. 3. It has been shown that damage to **intellectual development** because of institutionalisation can be **recovered** provided adoption takes place **before the age of 6 months**.
143
What does poor parenting involve?
1. **Quinton (1976)** compared women **raised at home** with those **raised in an institution**. 2. He found **ex-institutionalised** women had **extreme difficulties acting as parents**. 3. his led to **more** of their children **being in care**.
144
Evaluation of the effects of institutionalisation.
1. Romanian orphan studies involve **more than emotional deprivation** - institutions had **poor physical conditions** - could have affected **children’s health**. Children often received **limited cognitive stimulation** - may have **hindered cognitive development**. 2. it is difficult to conclude that the negative effects observed were **directly caused by emotional deprivation alone** - **physical neglect, malnutrition/healthcare deficits, and lack of stimulation** may also have **played a role**. 3. Weakens **causal conclusions** and questions the **internal validity** of the findings.
145
What is the context of the Romanian orphans study?
1. In the 1990's under **Nicolae Ceaușescu’s** pro-natalist policies, **contraception and abortion** were severely **restricted**, and families were pressured to have **large numbers of children**. 2. Many parents could **not afford** or were **unwilling/unable** to care for them, so **thousands of children** were placed in **large state-run orphanages**, often with **very poor social and emotional care**. 3. After the **1989 revolution**, many of these children were **adopted** (including by families in the UK) allowing researchers to investigate the **impact of early institutional deprivation**.
146
What was the **A**im of Rutter’s Romanian English Adoptee Study?
1. To investigate the effects of **early institutionalization** on **later development**. 2. To investigate the extent to which **good care** could make up for **poor early experiences in institutions**.
147
What was the **P**rocedure of Rutter’s Romanian English Adoptee Study?
1. He followed the development of a group of **165 Romanian orphans** who had been **adopted in Britain**. 2. **52 British children** adopted around the **same time** were used as a **control group**. 3. The **physical, cognitive, and emotional** development were assessed at ages **4, 6, 11, 15 and 25** years old.
148
What was the **F**indings of Rutter’s Romanian English Adoptee Study?
1. On arrival to the UK, **half** the adoptees showed signs of **delayed intellectual development** and the **majority** were **severely malnourished**. 2. At **11**, adoptees showed **differential rates of recovery** related to the **age of adoption**. 3. **Before 6 months:** Mean IQ of **102**. Between **6 months and 2 years:** Mean IQ of **86**. 4. Those adopted **after 6 months** showed **disinhibited attachment**, those adopted **before 6 months rarely showed this**.
149
What was the **C**onclusion of Rutter’s Romanian English Adoptee Study?
1. The **negative effects of institutionalization** can be overcome by **sensitive, nurturing care**. 2. As the British adopted children did **not suffer developmental** outcomes despite being **separated from their biological mothers**, separation from careers on its own **wont cause negative developmental effects**.
150
What is a strength of Rutters REA? (Not highlights importance of early intervention)
1. As this study used **standardised tests** (**cognitive and behavioural** assessments), the methods have been **replicated by other researchers** - **Morison and Elwood (2005)** found **similar results** with a group of Romanian orphans who had been adopted by **Canadian parents**. 2. This suggests the effects of **early Romanian institutional deprivation** are **robust and replicable** across **different adoptive contexts**. 3. **Reliability** in GRAVE.
151
What is another strength of Rutters REA? (Not used standardised tests)
1. Highlights the **importance of early interventions** in cases of child **neglect and institutional care** - provides **evidence** to inform policies around **adoption and foster care**. 2. The study emphasises the **significance of early placement** into **nurturing** environments. 3. **Applicability** in GRAVE.
152
What is a limitation of Rutters ERA? (Not children weren't randomly assigned)
1. Only **some** of the children received detailed **clinical investigations** - difficult to **generalise the findings** to all children. 2. **Individual differences** (child’s **resilience**) could have impacted the children’s **responses and developments** - findings cannot be applied to **all Romanian orphans**. 3. The children involved had **not gone through any trauma** before being institutionalised - effects of institutionalisation may not be generalisable to orphans **who have gone through trauma**. 4. **Generalisability** in GRAVE.
153
What is another limitation of Rutters REA? (Not findings aren't generalisable)
1. Children were **not randomly assigned** to conditions - researchers **did not intervene** with the adoption process so the **more sociable children** were typically **adopted first**. 2. May have been variables, other than the **age of adoption**, that impacted on whether there were **lasting effects of institutionalisation**. 3. **Validity** in GRAVE.
154
What was the **A**im of Zeanah et al’s. Bucharest Early Intervention Study (2005)?
1. To investigate the **effects of early institutionalisation** on **later development**.
155
What was the **P**rocedure of Zeanah et al’s. Bucharest Early Intervention Study (2005)?
1. Attachment was **assessed using the SS** in **95 Romanian children** aged between **12-31 months**. 2. They had spent **most of their lives** (**90%** on average) in **institutional care**. 3. Compared to a **control group of 50** children who had **never** lived in an institution. 4. Carers were asked about **unusual social behavior** that would indicate **disinhibited attachment**.
156
What was the **F**indings of Zeanah et al’s. Bucharest Early Intervention Study (2005)?
1. **74%** control group: securely attached 2. **19%** institutional group: securely attached 3. **Less than 20%** control group: disinhibited attachment. 4. **44%** institutional group: disinhibited attachment.
157
What was the **C**onclusion of Zeanah et al’s. Bucharest Early Intervention Study (2005)?
1. The **negative effects of institutionalisation** appear to have **longer term** impacts on **attachment behaviour**.
158
What is a strength of Zeanah et al’s. REI? (Not control group means you can see direct effect)
1. Identified how **impactful institutionalised care** can be on **attachment types** in children. 2. Children’s homes now **avoid** having **large numbers of caregivers** for each child and ensure a **smaller number of people** play a **central role** in the **child's development**. 3. Help **reduce** the number of children showing **disinhibited attachment** following institutionalisation - help them to **socialise better into society** .
159
What is another strength of Zeanah et al’s. REI? (Not children's home now avoid large numbers of caregivers)
1. The study compared orphans who had spent **most of their life** in an institution and children who had **never been an institution** - the use of a **control group** means psychologists can see a **direct comparison** of the **effects of institutionalised care**. 2. It can be inferred that the **differences in attachment type** were due to the **conditions the children were raised** in. 3. **Validity** in GRAVE.
160
What is a limitation of Zeanah et al’s. REI? (Not stigma attached to children that have been institutionalised)
1. The findings cannot be generalised to children in **less extreme institutional environments** outside of Romania - institutions in Romania are considered some of the **worst that the world is aware of**. 2. The findings from these children may not be able to be applied to **children institutionalised in other countries** where the conditions were not as **appalling**. 3. **Generalisability** in GRAVE.
161
What is another limitation of Zeanah et al’s. REI? (Not findings can't be applied to less extreme cases)
1. Raises **socially sensitive issues** because findings can contribute to **stigma and negative stereotyping** of children with a history of institutional care. 2. If research reports that longer institutionalisation is linked to poorer attachment or later difficulties it could lead people to **lower expectations and interact with the child differently**. 3. Risks a **self-fulfilling prophecy** - children’s outcomes are shaped **partly by how others respond to the label** rather than by **early experience alone**. 4. **Ethics** in GRAVE.
162
What is the definition of childhood relationships?
1. Relationships with **other people in childhood**, including **friends and classmates**, and with **adults** such as **family members and teachers**.
163
What is the definition of adult relationships?
1. Those relationships the individual goes on to have **later in life**. 2. Friendships and working relationships, but most critically, relationships with romantic partners and the person’s own children.
164
What is the definition of continuity hypothesis?
1. The idea that there is a **consistency** between **early emotional experiences and later relationships**.
165
How is the internal working model and the continuity hypothesis connected?
1. The continuity model is **based on the internal working model**. 2. If a child experiences **sensitive, reliable caregiving**, they are more likely to develop a **secure internal working model** - increases the likelihood of **forming healthy friendships and romantic** relationships. 3. If a child experienced **early insensitive or inconsistent care** it may lead to an **insecure internal working model**, which can make later relationships more **difficult** - individuals may **avoid intimacy** and rely on **emotional distance** (linked with **avoidant patterns**) or show **anxiety about closeness** and **reassurance-seeking** (linked with **resistant** patterns).
166
What did Kerns (1994) investigate about childhood relationships? (Use as a strength)
1. Found that early attachment type is associated with the **quality of peer relationships** in childhood. 2. **Securely** attached: **higher-quality** friendships (more trust, cooperation, and emotional support) 3. **Insecurely** attached: more likely to experience **friendship difficulties**. 4. Supports the continuity hypothesis by suggesting **early attachment is linked to later relationship outcomes**.
167
What did Myron-Wilson and Smith (1998) investigate about childhood relationships? (Use as a strength)
1. Investigated if **children’s involvement in bullying** is related to attachment type - used a **standardised questionnaire** with **196** children aged **7–11** in **London** asking about attitudes to **bullying and personal experiences**. 2. **Securely** attached: **unlikely** to be involved in bullying. 3. **Insecure-avoidant**: more likely to be **victims**. 4. **Insecure-resistant**: more likely to be **bullies**. 5. Supports the continuity hypothesis by suggesting **attachment-related patterns** are linked to **later peer relationships**.
168
What did Hazan and Shaver (1987) investigate about adult relationships? (Use as a strength)
1. Studied **adult romantic attachment** using a **'love quiz'** published in a newspaper, completed by **620 volunteers** - answered questions about their **current and most important** relationships, then **self-classified** as **secure, avoidant, or insecure-resistant**. 2. Secure: **56%** - reported more **trusting, longer-lasting** relationship. 3. Avoidant: **25%** - reported **fear of intimacy** and sometimes **jealousy**. 4. Resistant: **19%** - reported more **emotional volatility and jealousy**. 5. Supports the idea that **attachment-related patterns are reflected in adult romantic relationships**, consistent with the continuity hypothesis.
169
What did Kirkpatrick and Davis (1994) investigate about adult relationships? (Use as a strength)
1. Followed around **300 dating couples** for **3 years** - individuals classified as **securely attached** reported more **stable, satisfying** relationships over time than **insecurely attached** individuals. 2. Supports the continuity hypothesis by suggesting **early attachment-related patterns** are carried into **later romantic relationships**.
170
What did McCarthy (1999) investigate about adult relationships? (Use as a strength)
1. Assessed adult relationship **quality** in **40 women** aged **25–44** whose attachment type had been **measured in infancy**. 2. Infant secure: **better-quality** adult friendships and romantic relationships. 3. Infant insecure-avoidant: more problems with **intimacy in romantic relationships**. 4. Supports the continuity hypothesis and Bowlby’s internal working model by suggesting **early attachment patterns are reflected in later relationships**.
171
What did Bailey et al. (2007) investigate about adult relationships? (Use as a strength)
1. Provided evidence that **internal working models** influence **later parenting**. 2. **99 mothers’ infants** had their attachment to the mother assessed using the **Strange Situation**, while the **mothers’ attachment to their own mothers** was assessed using a **questionnaire**. 3. Many mothers showed the **same attachment** classification in **their own childhood** in relation to **their infants**. 4. Supports the continuity hypothesis by suggesting attachment patterns are **cross-generational** as adults may **base their parenting** behaviour on their **internal working model**.
172
What is a limitation of interal working model? (Not evidence against it)
1. Criticised for being difficult to **test and falsify** - proposed to operate **largely unconsciously**, it cannot be **measured directly**, so researchers often rely on **indirect indicators** (**self-report attachment** measures, relationship **outcomes**) 2. This creates a **theoretical problem**: if the construct cannot be **operationalised clearly**, it is hard to demonstrate **cause-and-effect** or rule out **alternative explanations**. 3. This means that evidence for internal working models can be **criticised as less valid**. 4. **Testability** in SCOUT.
173
What is another limitation of interal working model? (Not that it is hard to test and falsify)
1. **Regensburg et al. (2008)** provides **evidence against** the continuity hypothesis - **43** individuals were followed from around **1 year old**, and at **age 16** attachment was assessed using the **Adult Attachment Interview**. 2. They found **no evidence** of continuity between **early attachment and later attachment outcomes**. 3. This suggests that early attachment may **not reliably predict** later development for **everyone**, and that **later experiences** (**life events, friendships/romantic relationships**) may **modify outcomes**. 4. **Conflicting evidence** in SCOUT.