When is an act physical or factually impossible?
If the act in question amounts to an offence but is unable to be committed due to interruption, ineptitude or any other circumstances beyond their control
What happens if you charge someone with the full offence but only an attempt is proven?
They can be convicted of that attempt
What questions should be asked when determining the point at which preparation may become an attempt?
-Has the offender done anything more than getting himself into a position from which they could embark on an actual attempt
or
-Has the offender actually commenced execution, have they taken a step in the actual crime itself
What constitutes sufficiently proximate?
Where the accused has started to commit the full offence and has gone beyond the phase of mere preparation
What case law relates to legally impossible?
R v Donnelly
Where stolen property has been returned to the owner or legal title to any such property has been acquired by any person, it is not an offence to subsequently receive it, even though the receiver may know that the property had previously been stolen or dishonestly obtained
What is the function of the judge and jury?
The judge decides whether the defendant had left the preparation stage and was trying to effect completion or not.
If yes the matter goes to the jury to decide if the prosecution have proven their case beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant intended to commit the full offence.
What happens if you charge someone with an attempt and the full offence is proven?
The can only be convicted of the attempt
Who decides whether an act or omission is proximate to the offence?
The judge
Case law relating to multiple acts being viewed together?
R v Harpur
The court may have regards to the conduct viewed cumulatively up to the point when the conduct in question stops. The defendants conduct may be considered and it’s entirety. Considering how much remains to be done is always relevant, though not determinative.
What is the penalty for an attempt?
-Where a punishment is not specifically described by this act and the punishment for the offence attempted is life then the maximum sentence for an attempt is 10 years.
In any other case is liable for not more than half the maximum punishment of the offence attempted.
If the defendant does an act that is sufficiently proximate they have no defence that they….?
What case law relate to physically impossible attempts?
Higgins v Police
Where plants been cultivated as cannabis and not infect cannabis it is physically, not legally, impossible to cultivate such prohibited plants. Accordingly, it is possible to commit the offence of attempting to cultivate cannabis
and Police v Jay
A man bought hedge clippings believing they were cannabis
Definition of attempt
Everyone who having an intent to commit an offence, does or omits an act for the purpose of accomplishing their objective, is guilty of an attempt to commit the offence intended, whether it was possible in the circumstances to commit the offence or not.
What must be possible for the offence to be committed?
It must be legally possible, it does not need to be physically possible.
Definition of an act
To take action or do something, to bring about a particular result
Definition of omission
the action of excluding or leaving someone or something, a failure to fulfill a moral or legal obligation
Can you attempt to attempt an offence?
No
When can’t you charge someone with an attempt?
How can an offenders intent be inferred in relation to an attempt?
From the act itself
Proved by admissions or confessions
What is the definition of proximity?
There isn’t one and it will come down to the circumstances of each individual case.
What are examples of acts that may constitute an attempt?
How can acts be viewed together in relation to preparing to commit an offence?
When acts are viewed in isolation they may be seen as preparatory but when viewed together they may take on a different context and therefore amount to a criminal attempt
Case law relating to inferring intent from the act.
R v Ring
In this case the offenders intent was to steal property by putting his hands into the pocket of the victim. Unbeknown to the offender the pocket was empty. Despite this he was able to be convicted of attempted theft, because the intent to steal whatever property might have been discovered inside the pocket was present in his mind and demonstrated by his actions. The remaining elements were also satisfied.
When is an act legally impossible?
When the completed act would not be an offence even if the person mistakenly believes that it is an offence.