Why is a car crash due to a heart attack not a criminal act?
Due to the requirement of VOLUNTARINESS OF ACTION as a conduct element in crim liability.
In this case D did not chose to have a heart attack
What is a state of AUTOMATISM?
Where D has NO CONTROL over what they doing
What are the 3 exceptions to the usual rule that ARs require an act?
What is a statutory crime of omission?
Failure to act as the law requires.
- ie not wearing a seat belt or not filing a tax return
What is situational liability?
Being in a prohibited situation
Prob: no wrongdoing required - could be holding a taser believed to be a torch
What is the problem with crimes of possession?
No requirement to be voluntarily in possession - inconsistent with the act requirement
What is a conduct crime?
What is a result crime?
What are the terms: “assignable”, “attributal”, “proximate”, “blamable” and “imputable” all legal synonyms for?
Causation - “causing”
In what case did a soldier get in a fight in a barracks and stabbed another soldier who subsequently died after being dropped by medics?
SMITH 1959
What is the “Eggshell Skull Rule”?
D’s causal responsibility for resultant harm is not deflected if V has a condition which renders them esp likely to suffer injury or die
What is the name for an act or event that breaks the causal connection between a wrong or crime committed by the defendant and subsequent happenings?
Novus actus interveniens
What is a good source of whether D’s act killed V?
The cause of death in the autopsy report
In what case was D cleared of murdering V who he had stabbed but subsequently died of pneumonia?
JORDAN 1956
What is a crime of basic intent?
Where D does not have to have foreseen any consequence, or harm, beyond that laid down in the definition of the AR.
What is the MR in a crime of basic intent?
Intention or Recklessness and does not exceed the AR
What was the legal significance of HYAM 1975
Someone who courts the risk of a consequence occurring is as blameworthy as a person who intends a consequence
What was the consequence of WOOLLIN 1999
Where charge is murder and in the rare cases where the simple direction [intent to kill or cause GBH] is not enough, the jury should be directed that they are not entitled to find the necessary intention, unless they feel sure that death or serious bodily harm was a virtual certainty
Should motive be taken into account in deciding if intention is present or not?
No
What does Woollin suggest about foresight of anything which is less than a virtual certainty?
Cannot be INTENTION but can only be RECKLESSNESS
What is Duff’s test on intention?
Whether actor would consider his actions as a failure if “if the consequence did not result.”