Battery Flashcards

(12 cards)

1
Q

Defined in…

A

> Common law
- Intentionally or recklessly applying unlawful force with no injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Actus reus

A
  1. Application of force.
  2. Force has to be unlawful.
  3. How the force is applied.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Clothes

A

> R v Thomas (1985)
1. The slightest touch is all that is needed.
2. Touching someone’s clothes is the same as touching them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Implied consent

A

> Wilson v Pringle (1987)
- Legal principle = For a battery the contact must be proved as hostile.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Hostile meaning

A

> Unwanted or aggressive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Ordinary Jostling’s of everyday life

A

> Wilson V Pringle
- It is not unlawful as D will be assumed to have given implied consent to them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Continuing Act

A

> Fagan v MPC (1969)
= Actus reus before mens rea

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Indirectly

A

> DPP v Logdon
= Injured in other non-intended ways / chain reaction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Omission

A

> DPP v Santana Bermudez (2003)
= duty to act and neglects to perform that duty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Mens rea

A

> Intentionally or recklessly applying unlawful force on/ to another person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Intention

A

> R v Mohan
= Where D aims to bring the consequence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Recklessness

A

> R v Cunningham
= D realises the consequence yet carries on regardless.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly