challenging behaviour feature of
a range of developmental or mental health disorders.
e.g ADHD, ASD, IDD, anxiety
could also be due to consequence of context
- sleep, nutrition, relationships, reinforcement
Non compliant behaviour
refusal to follow directions, rules or requests
impulse control and conduct disorders (3)
oppositional defiant disorder
intermittent explosive disorder
conduct disorder
oppositional defiant disorder, and Cx
a pattern of angry, argumentative and defiant beahviour toward authority WITHOUT aggression
- onset childhood
at least 6 months, 4 of these exhibited with at least on other person (not sibling)
- loses temper, angry, resentful, argues with authority or adults, actively defies and refuses to comply with requests, blames others,
distress in invividul or other members in immediate scoial context, negative impact on society
Intermittent explosive disorder
Sudden outbursts of anger or aggression that are out of proportion to the situation
- episodic
- early adolescent
Conduct Disorder
Serious persistent patterns of violating the rights of others by breaking societal rules or causing harm
prevalence behavioural disorders
ODD 3.3%
IED 4.4%
CD: 4.0% - 2-3* more liekly in males
NZ 5-10%
negative outcomes of conduct/behavioural problems
Mental illness vulnerability
- Dunedin study 25-60% of people that were in adult psych wards met cirteria for ODD/CD as a teenager
Poor physicla health
- cardioasvular, dental, frquent GP $$’
suicide, SU, Violence, Crime
lifetime outcomes of conduct problems
those who epericne chilhood or adolesence conduct problems show life ling costs in society e.g crime and violence
Early and persistent conduct problems = huge burden on society across criminal justice, health, and welfare systems.
IED Cx
a) reccurent outburst and failure to control agressinve impulses (verbal, physcial) at leas twice weekly for 3 months or 3* damage, destruction physical assault within 12 months
B) out of proportion
C) not premeditated
D) aged at least 6+
Conduct disorder Cx
repetivitve persitent patterns of breaking the rights of others or major related age appropirate societal norms 3 within the last 12 months and 1 in 6 monhts
Comorbidity
anxiety, depression
learning problems, poor academic achievement
ADHD presented within 50% of CD
Biopscyhosocial model of CD
bio predispositon adn social predispostion + parrenting and peer influecnes, leading to devlopmen of mental processes leading ot CD
Childhood risk factors of CD
Systematic/social
- poverty, deprivation, deviant peer groups, school failure
parent
- harsh, neglectful, low monitoring and supervision, parental mental heath issues, arguments
child facotrs
- irritable, impulsive, agressive, poor emotion regualtion, neurocognitive difficulties e.g ADHD
ineffective treamtents for beahvioural or conduct problems
Boot camps and wilderness programs
hospital treatment/clinical setting, juvi
individual counselling - doest address family.social outcomes
group treatments - can make things worse peers influencing each other
Interventions that do work
Parent management training
- teaching anf improving parenting skills, enhabing parent child relationshops and reducing coercive or inconsistent discipline
Examples of Parent management internvetions
Triple P (postive parenting programme)
- strengthen parenting skills
- positive reinforcement, consistent rules, managing misbehaviour,
integrated family intervention
- parent training and child focused interventions
- improving parent child communication
3 common focuses of effective parent training interventions
Reinforcement processes (behavioural or systems)
family structure (systems)
Attributions (cognitive)
Therapy and limitations
early intervention = better outcomes espc with ODD
psychotheraphy: Parents tend to rate improvements higher than the children themselves.
limitations: Treatments that work well in controlled research settings often perform less well in real-world clinical conditions.
There is a major gap in dissemination and implementation—many families never access high-quality interventions.
Up to 50% of children continue to show clinical-level disruptive behaviour after treatment (Dedousis-Wallace et al., 2021).
Drop-out rates are higher for families with more severe difficulties, reducing overall effectiveness.