modern agriculture vs natural systems
Modern agriculture
- v intensive (high input) monocultures
- Often control composition, density, spatial arrangement, phenology (planting time)
- Focus on production (not multifunctioning) = high yielding BUT low diversity
- Inputs: fertiliser, pesticide, herbicide, water, pollinators
Natural system
- Species coexisting
- More productive and stable due to niche differentiation leading to niche complementarity
- > Complementary resource partitiong (type, time and space)
- > Nurse crop (shelter while grow)
- > Reduction of natural enemies (pests, weeds, disease)
- > Increase pollinator abundance/ richness
Intercropping
cultivated multiple species on same land
Types:
- Spacial: fully mixed or rows
It is favoured if:
- Costly / impossible to use inputs to reduce environmental variability
- no single species monoculture will exhibit high yield under wide range of conditions
- Diversity through niche differentiation may enhance yield under these spatially heterogeneous and temporally fluctuating conditions.
- The aims are to sustainably intensify production while reducing conventional inputs
- To optimize both yields and ecosystem services.
Measuring overyeild due to intercropping
land equivalent ratios (LER)
LER = ratio of yeild under monoculture vs yeild under intercropping of each plant added together (>1 = overyeilding)
Intercropping examples
Corn-bean-squash companion planting
- Corn = 3D vertical support for beans
- Beans = N fixation + antiherbivore (due to hairs on beans)
- Squash = ground layer suppressing weds, reducing evaporation
- fourth sister = Cleome surrilata (rocky-mountain bee plant) to attract bee pollinators for bean / squash
Coffee:
- Sun-tolerant coffee varieties developed so can grow as monoculture
- Initially grown with trees (agro forestry)
- Biodiversity benefits to birds: 61 bird species in sun grown vs 243 bird species in shade grown
- If many other species than may decrease yield, but offset by higher priced product as more bird friendly
Pull push plants
- Plant to attract pest, plant to repel pest and main crop
- Example: Alternate rows of Maize and Desmodium uncinatum (repellant), with three rows of Napier grass Pennisetum purpureum planted around plots (attractant)
Evidence of benefits
Cedar Creek and Jena experiments
- show polyculture has increased ecosystem function (forage yield, soil organic matter, yield stability, pest / weed suppression, soil fertility) compared to monoculture
Hann and Cammarano (2022)
- intercropping Suppresses natural enemy impacts on 68% of species
-> Compound release
-> Reduced tranmission
-> Reduced specialisation
Li et Al, 2023
- improvement in plant nutrition -> protein better calorie worse
Example: Rice and tropical rain forest
Rice blast = fungal pathogen
intercropped species:
- Glutinous stick rice = higher value + lower yields
- Non-glutinous hybrid varieties = less susceptible to rice blast but less valuable crop
Results
- mixture yield increased by 89% compared to monoculture
- blast 94% less severe than in monoculture (as height difference between tall glutinous and short hybrid affect temp, humidity and light and make worse for blast)
Intercropping socioeconomically feasible as both crops are utilised
-> Glutinous = exported
-> Non-glutinous = eaten locally
Example: Borneo forests
Restoring deforestation and abandoned oil plantation
Barriers & challenges erview
Overview
Increasing diversity can increase crop and forage yield, yield stability, pollinators, and weed, pest and disease suppression.
When to use intercropping?
- The aims are to sustainably intensify production while reducing conventional inputs
- To optimize both yields and ecosystem services.
- High inputs required to reduce condition variability
Examples:
- Coffee
- The three sisters
- Push and pull
Success stories:
- Rice
Limitations
Over the next decades, if monoculture yields continue to decelerate or decline and as demand for ecosystem services continues to rise, diversification could become an essential tool for sustaining production and ecosystem services in croplands, range-lands and production forests