study design
study types
-experimental
-observational
>descriptive
>analytic
descriptive epidemiology
analytic epidemiology
analytic epi-studies require info to
analytic epi- is built around
-the analysis of the relationship between two items
>exposures
>effects (disease)
-looking for determinants or possibe causes of disease
-useful for hypthesis testing
descriptive statistics
-can take on various forms >tables >graphs >numerical summary measures -application of statistical methods makes it possible to effectively describe the public health problem
helpfulness of descriptive epidemiology
4 types of descriptive studies
ecological study
-involves aggregated data on the population level
-ecological fallacy
>when population level are used for individual level
-advantage: annoymous
-disadvantage: can’t have individual correlation
case report
-involves a profile of a single individual
case series
-involves a small group of patients with a similar diagnosis
-provide evidence for longer scale studies
>hypotheis gathering
cross-sectional survey
strengths of cross-sectional
weakness of cross-sectional
-unable to establish sequence of events >association NOT causation -influenced by response bias -no follow-up -no incidence or relative risk data
serial surveys
-cross-sectional surveys that are routinely conducted
>regular frequencies
cohort study
-of persons who have been exposed and are followed over time with selected health outcomes
case-control study
-of persons who have been exposed and are followed over time with selected health outcomes
case-control study
- are cases more/less likely than contorls to have had exposures/behaviours
2 methods for age-adjusted rates
2. Indirect
direct method
-assume males and females have same rate
indirect method
-age-specific rates are unstable
-standardized morbididty ratio (SMR)
>know total counts
>use rate from other gender
SMR=1
-events observed were same as expected
SMR>1
-more events observed than expected