Case Law Flashcards

(34 cards)

1
Q

What is the R v Taisilika?

A

The nature of a blow and the severity of the wound point to the necessary intent.

Intoxication or lack of memory to an event does not point to a lack of intent at the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is found in R v Collister?

A

The surrounding circumstances to an offence point to the intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is found in R v Waters?

A

A wound is the breaking of the skin accompanied by the flow of blood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is found in DPP v Smith

A

Grievous bodily harm is harm that is very serious, bodily harm needs no explanation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is found in R v Rapana and Murray

A

A disfigurement is the alteration of the physical appearance, it need not be permanent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is found in Cameron v R

A

Recklessness is established if the Defendant knew of the proscribed result, knew the circumstances existed and continued to take the risk unreasonably.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is found in R v Tipple

A

Reckless means knowing of risk and acting anyway

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is found in R v Sturm?

A
  • It is not necessary to prove the intended crime was committed.
  • To stupefy is to cause an effect on the mind or nervous system of a person or interfere with the person’s mental or physical ability to act.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is found in R v Wati?

A

There must be proof of the commission or attempt by the person committing the assault or person fleeing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is found in R v Tihi

A

2 fold prosecution test:
- Intent to commit the imprisonable offence
- Intent to cause or reckless to the harm caused.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is found in r v Crossan?

A
  • incapable of resistance includes powerlessness of will as well as physical incapacity
  • Take away and detained are separate and distinct offences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is found in R v Hunt

A

It is not necessary the person harmed was the intended target, the general malice is sufficient.

The extent of an injury is immaterial, it is important to establish the intent behind the injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is found in R v DONOVAN

A

Injures means to cause bodily harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is found in R v Mwai

A

GBH is not limited to immediate harmful consequences of an offenders actions. Steady, relentless progression of a disease leading to death suffices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is found in R v Bentham?

A

The body or its digits do not constitute a “thing” in regards to a weapon or instrument

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is found in R v Lapier?

A

Robbery is complete the moment an item is taken, even if only brief

17
Q

What is found in R v Skivington?

A

A claim of right defence to theft is a claim of right defence to robbery

18
Q

What is found in R v Pekepo?

A

A reckless discharge of a firearm in the direction of a bystander (who is hit) is not sufficient to prove intent.

19
Q

What is found in R v Swain?

A

Purposefully removing a firearm from a bag after being called upon by a Constable amounts to a use of that firearm.

20
Q

What is found in Fisher v R?

A

An offender knew that someone was trying to arrest or detain them

21
Q

What is found in R v Wellard?

A
  • Taking away is the loss of liberty of a victim and taking them away from where they want to be
22
Q

What is found in r v Pryce?

A

Detention is a continuous and active concept - To keep in confinement or custody

23
Q

What is found in R v Cox?

A

Consent must be free full voluntary and informed and must not be obtained by fraud or duress

24
Q

What is found in Owen v Residential Health Management Unit

A
  • Bodily harm may include psychiatric injury but does not include mere emotions, hysteria or a nervous condition.
  • Bodily harm in s188 CA61 includes really serious psychiatric injury identified as such by specialist evidence
25
What is found in R v Chan-Fook?
Bodily Harm may be mental or psychiatric if diagnosed by a medical specialist
26
What is found in R v Claridge?
- The term “by any violent means” is not limited to physical violence and may include threats of violence depending on circumstances. - It includes the application of force that physically incapacitates a person.
27
What is found in R v Mohi?
An offence is committed at the time of taking as long as there is the necessary intent.
28
What is found in R v Peat?
The offence of robbery is complete at the time of taking, regardless of if the property is returned
29
What is found in R v Maihi?
There must be a nexus between threats made and the taking of property, they need not be contemporaneous
30
What is found in Peneha v Police?
It is sufficient that the Defendant’s actions forcibly interfere with the Victim’s personal freedoms
31
What is found in R v Broughton?
Threats may be direct or veiled, conveyed by words or conduct. An absence of fear by the Victim does not negate the threat.
32
What is found in R v Mitchell?
Historic threats suffice on a case by case basis for robbery
33
What is found in R v Joyce?
Aggravated robbery requires two or more people physically present at the time of the robbery or assault
34
What is established in R v GALEY?
Being together with means two or more persons having a common intention to use their combined force, either in any event or as circumstances might require, directly in perpetration of a crime.