Van Duyn
Directives have direct effect
Marshall
Direct only have direct effect, no horizontal effect
Costa/ENEL
Primacy of EU law
Simmenthal
National law must be changed/set aside when incompatible with EU law
Kobler
MS liability for judicial breaches
Brasserie du pêcheur
Conflicting national law can give rise to MS liability
Foster
MS liability extends to - Established by Foster but changed to alternative by Farrell
Marleasing and van Colson
National law must be interpreted in accordance with EU law
Tobacco case (Germany v. EP and Coucil and European Council)
To find the correct legal basis, apply the centre of gravity test
Francovich
MS liability criterion:
Van Gend & Loos (+ Defrenne)
For direct effect, the provision must be:
1. Clear
2. Precise
3. Unconditional
4. Have no implementing measures = Deleted by Defrenne
Broeckmeulen
What is a court/tribunal? A court whose judgement is
Foto-Frost
The national courts can refer questions to the ECJ in preliminary rulings
CILFIT
Act clair - National courts do not have to refer
Commission v. Portugal
A MS cannot invoke internal difficulties as a defence in infringement proceedings
Plaumann
Individual concern = If an affect affect an individual (or a group of) by reason of certain attributes which are peculiar to them or due to circumstances which differentiate them from all others
Bergardem
Establishes EU liability
Council v. Commission
Commission can withdraw proposal (until 1st reading) if raison d’être
Biocides
Legislator can choose between delegated and implementing act
Visa
Only delegated act can amend
Titanitum dioxides
Single legal basis if procedures are incompatible
Smart sanctions
Lex Specialis
Adelener
Indirect effect of directives
Faglia
You need a concrete case for preliminary rulings