A binding contract requires all material terms to be certain and complete. Only then can an agreement be enforced by the court.
To determine certainty, the court applies an objective test asking whether in all circumstances of the case, the parties have agreed all the terms they considered to be a precondition to creating legal relations (RTS Flexible Systems Ltd v Molkerei Alois Muller GmbH & Company KG (UKProduction) [2010 UKSC 14).
A court won’t strike down an agreement simply because it lacks certainty – this is a last resort.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
Two pieces of case law as examples.
A
Scammell v Ouston [1941] AC 25: an agreement based on ‘hire-purchase terms’ was too uncertain to be enforced. The court considered that as there are so many different types of hire-purchase agreements based on a variety of different terms this agreement was too vague to be an enforceable contract.
Hillas v Arcos (1932) 147 LT 503: an agreement to buy ‘timber of fair specification’ was enforceable. The court considered that the words would be given a reasonable meaning (particularly in light of the parties previous dealings) and the agreement was binding.