Certainty intro
when may a court say an agreement is void for uncertainty
—> terms are too vague/ambiguous to indicate parties’ intentions
—> is an illusory agreement
—> it is incomplete
—> merely an agreement to agree or an agreement to negotiate
when may a court say an agreement is NOT void for uncertainty
contract will not be void if uncertain part of it can be severed leaving rest of agreement intact
Vague or ambiguous terms
How will courts attempt to resolve vague or ambiguous terms
Illusory promise
Completeness
How can incompleteness still be binding
—> agreement can still be binding if it leaves SOME important matters for final determination in future by 3rd party OR subsidiary matters to be decided by one of the parties provided parties don’t need to reach further agreement
- parties can include formula or machinery provisions to ensure essential matters can be determined in future w/o further agreement
—> both ensure essential matters can be determined in future w/o parties needing to reach further agreement
Completeness: Formula provision
Completeness: Machinery provision
Agreement to agree or negotiate
When can agreement to agree or negotiate be enforceable
→ a clearly-worded dispute resolution clause that included an agreement to ‘meet and undertake genuine and good faith negotiations with a view to resolving the dispute’ was enforceable and not uncertain.
→ the promise referred to a known body of rights and obligations, respected the parties’ contractual rights and gave due allowance for honest and genuinely held views about those rights, and the parties willingly accepted the duty.
- altho not in agreeance with NSW court, court indicated lock out agreements may be enforceable
Agreement to agree or negotiate: lock out agreements
lock out agreements= a deed is executed or party provides consideration in exchange for other party agreeing not to negotiate with other parties for specified time
Severance