Learning Styles
Concept that individuals differ in how they earn most affectively. Some different modes of instruction/study are visual, auditory, tactile and experiential
Meshing hypothesis
Instruction is most effective when it matches the preferences of the learner (visual learner using a visual mode will lead to most success)
Why is this theory so popular?
Why not to base beliefs solely on experience
-No comparison groups and confounds
Research vs Experience
Personal experience often does not offer a systematic comparison experience, as we use 1 subject (us) whereas systematic data collection does and they can compare a treatment present group vs absent (Benjamin Rush example)
Confounds
A confound occurs when there are multiple possible causes for an outcome. It leads to a confusion about what caused the difference between groups (it is NOT anything/everything wrong in a study)
How to reduce confounds
Pashler et al. study
Review of literature to see whether practices of learning styles are effective, using empirical studies. They were looking for interaction between “types” of learning and modes of instruction
What 4 criteria did they use to pick the studies
1) Groups divided by their learning styles
2) Randomly assigned to methods
3) Complete the same final
4) Hypothesis: The most effective method for students with one learning style is not the most effective method for students with a different learning style
Pashler et al. Findings
Pashler et al. Conclusions