Management > Chapter 11 - Global Strategy > Flashcards

Chapter 11 - Global Strategy Flashcards

(60 cards)

Study These Flashcards
1
Q

Internalization framing tool

A

=> going global or not

  1. potential benefits for the company?
  2. have the necessary management skills?
  3. Costs outweigh benefits?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Motives for internationalization

A
  • talent + skills
  • resources + spaces
  • risks
  • competitive moves
  • market related
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Talent + skills (motives for internationalization)

A
  • recruitment of young talents
  • improved career tracks
  • new management practices
  • personal interest in internationalization
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Resources + spaces (motives for internationalization)

A
  • spatially distant rare material access

- access to clusters (like Silicon Valley)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Risks (motives for internationalization)

A
  • diversify business cycle risks

- diversify currency risks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Competitive moves (motives for internationalization)

A
  • attack competitors at home

- take-over other firms before competitor can

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Market related (motives for internationalization)

A
  • conquer new markets
  • global market for higher growth
  • overcome domestic growth barriers
  • escape domestic regulations
  • prolong product life cycle
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Reasons for suboptimal internationalization performance

A
  • Disregard of available data, especially on local competition and supply.
  • No adaption of pricing, sales and marketing channels to local culture and institutions.
  • No adaption of product portfolio to local preferences.
  • No delegation of responsibility to local experts.
  • Suboptimal logistics and operations on a spatial scale.
  • Rush into B-locations. Not enough time to organize access, assets and/or acquisition.
  • No adaption of branding the local language
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The liability of foreignness

A
  • inherent disadvantage in host countries bc of non-native status
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The liability of foreignness Major aspects for existence

A
  • differences in formal + informal institutions i. Foreign countries
  • formal + informal discrimination
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Overcoming the liability of foreignness

A

Convincing the costumer even despite the liability of foreignness
=> deploy superior resources + capabilities creating competitive advantage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Entry strategy - main questions

A

1) where to enter?
2) when to enter?
3) How to enter?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Where to enter ?

A
  • spaces linked to strategic goals
  • geographical advantages
  • social advantages
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Spaces linked to strategic goals type

A
  • natural resource seeking (eg. Lithium Chile)
  • market seeking (Seafood Japan)
  • efficiency seeking (Manufacturing China)
  • innovation seeking (IT Silicon Valley)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Spaces linked to geographical advantages

A
  • Access to ocean, fertile regions, sun
  • access to low salary/ mega cities
  • spatial concentration of economic activities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Spaces linked to social advantages

A
  • cultural distance: difference between 2 cultures

- institutional distance: comparing social institutions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Systematic multiple screening - where to enter

A
  • first row estimate
  • deepen screening only for good prospect candidates
  • final selection of interesting candidates
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Potentially relevant aspects for structuring an estimate - where to enter

A
  • Sales + profit forecast (strategic goal: market seeking)
  • resources + incentives (strategic goal: natural resource seeking)
  • risks / subrisk
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Market potential?

A 
1. entry conditions 
(import regulations + logistic / operative constrains)
2. Competition 
(Industry structure + key competitors)
3. Distributions channels 
((inter-company) value chain)
4. Consumer behavior
(Consumer reaction to product + brand)
5. Marketing intensity
(How is marketing + promotion done)
6. Factor cost (labor, capital, taxation...)
=> sales + profit forecast
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

screening for natural resource seeking

A
  • Resources
  • Incentives
    (- Market + competition)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Another angel for screening - risks + subrisks

A
  • political risks (shareholder/ employee/ operational exposure)
  • competitive risks (corruption/ cartels/ networks)
  • operational risks (infrastructure/ regulations)
  • economic risks (growth/ inflation/exchange)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

When to enter

A
  • first mover

- late mover

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

First mover advantage (Internalization)

A
  • property, technological leadership
  • preemption of scare resources
  • establishment of entry barriers for late entrants
  • avoidance of clash with dominant firms at home
  • relationships + connections with key stakeholders
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Later mover advantage

A
  • opportunity to free ride in first mover investments
  • resolution of technological + market uncertainty
  • first movers difficulty to adapt to market changes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
How to enter - the scale of entry
- large-scale entry | - small scale entry
26
Large scale entry ( + drawback)
> demonstration of strategic commitment - helps to assure local costumer + suppliers - deters potential entrants > drawback - limited strategic flexibility elsewhere - potential huge losses
27
Small scale entry
- less costly - focus on accumulating experience - learning by doing while limiting downside risk > drawback - lack of strong commitment - difficulties on building market share +/ capturing first mover advantages
28
Two step process (how to enter)
1. equity vs. non-equity mode | 2. precise form of mode
29
Non-equity modes (1. step decision)
Exports + contractual agreements - > reflect relatively small-scales commitments - > don’t require the establishment of independent organizations
30
Equity modes (1. step decisions)
Joint ventures + wholly owned subsidiaries - > reflect relatively large-scaled + less reversible commitments - > call for establishment of independent organizations
31
Step 2 precise form - types
``` > non equity modes - exports - contractual agreements > Equity/ FDI modes - joint ventures - wholly owned subsidiaries ```
32
Exports
- direct exports | - indirect exports with intermediary firms
33
Direct exports advantages
- direct contact with the foreign market - economies of scale in production concentrated in home country - better control over distribution
34
Direct exports disadvantages
- transportation costs - distance to costumers - trade barriers - protectionism
35
Indirect exports disadvantages
- less control over distribution | - curbed learning opportunities for operation in foreign market
36
Indirect exports advantages
- intermediary firms provide knowledge + networks - economies of scale in production concentrated in home country - overcome information asymmetries i. foreign markets
37
Contractual agreements
- licensing - franchising - turnkey projects - R+D contracts - Co-marketing
38
Licensing
``` Licensor permits licensee to use assets for royalty fee Licensor provides combination of: 1. Intellectual assets 2. Supporting assets Licensee compensate licensor ```
39
Franchising
Specialized form of licensing Franchiser sells intangible asset to a franchisee for a royalty fee Franchisee agreed to abide strictly rules
40
Licensing/ franchising pro + cons
+ low development cost + low risks - little control over technology + marketing - curbed global coordination - may create competitors
41
Turnkey projects pro + cons
+ profits in countries where FDI is restricted - lack of long term presence - may create efficient competitors (trained personnel)
42
R+D contracts pro + cons
+ access innovation hubs/ sources at low costs - difficult to negotiate + enforce contracts - may lead to loss of core innovation capabilities - may create innovative competitors
43
Co- marketing pros + cons
+ higher customer reach - limited coordination
44
Joint ventures
- entity owned by two/ more patent companies | - each party has equity + take risks
45
Wholly owned subsidiary (WOS)
=> entry mode with highest resource commitment + control | - establish own value chain activities in foreign market
46
WOS variations
- miniature replica of headquarters - R+D-, sales-, purchasing-subsidiary - Production subsidiary => entourage production //assembly process
47
WOS modes
- Greenfield | - Acquisition
48
JV pros + cons
+ sharing costs + risks (but also profits) + access (knowledge + assets) + politely acceptable - divergent interest of partner - Limited operational control - coordination complexity
49
Greenfield pros + cons
+ complete equity + operational control + protection of know-how + ability to coordinate globally - politically less acceptable - planning costs - adds capacity to industry - slow entry speed
50
Acquisition pros + cons
+ same as greenfield + industry capacity stays fixed + fast entry speed - politically less acceptable - post.-acquisition integration costs
51
Global strategic sets of pressure for MNEs | Two major sets of pressure
1) cost reduction => calls for global integration 2) local responsiveness = pressure to react to local preferences => opposing forces => trade-off problems
52
Global strategic configuration types
- home replication - localization - global standardization - transnational
53
Home replication pros + cons
+ use of home country based advantages + easy implementation - lack of local responsiveness - foreign costumer alienation
54
Localizations pros + cons
+ maximal local responsiveness - high costs due to multiplication of tasks - lack of global coherence
55
Global standardization pros + cons
+ use of low-cost advantages + strong global coherence - lack of responsiveness
56
Transnational pros + cons
+ partially cost efficient + partially locally responsive + global learnings + diffusion of innovation - organizational complex - difficulty of implementation
57
Global standardization strategy
standardized products sold throughout the world high pressure for low cost low pressure for local responsiveness
58
Transnational strategy
combination of transnational integration (low cost) + benefits of being local responsive high pressure for low cost and for local responsiveness
59
Home replication (export)
replicated domestic business model + core competencies to enter international market low pressure for low cost and for local responsiveness
60
Localization strategy
operating separate subsidiaries that develop specific products meeting local market demand low pressure for low cost high pressure for local responsiveness
Management
flashcards
Decks in class (11)
# Cards
Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2026 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions