1
Q
Conductive Arguments
A
support: convergent. premises are all separate from each other which lead to the conclusion.
2
Q
Why you shouldn’t break down the Conductive Argument into separate Arguments.
A
- in practice one doesn’t break down such arguments, but presents them as a whole
- In the end, one would have to consider whether these premises together support the conclusion appropriately.
3
Q
How is a conductive argument cogent?
A
e
4
Q
Other names for Conductive Arguments?
A
- cumulation argument
- balance of consideration
- good reason arguments
5
Q
Counter considerations
A
claim that is negatively relevant to the conclusion of an argument. Positive claims have to outweigh the negative claims.
ex: I think I should go to China, It will be nice and hot, vacation, good food… “but it is a long way from home”. therefore, I should go to China.
6
Q
Words serving to introduce counter-considerations
A
e
7
Q
Words indicating a return to the main theme, after recognizing counter considerations
A
e
8
Q
Evaluating the Conductive Argument
A
- A
- R
- G
- are counter considerations good?
9
Q
Confirmation bias
A
e
