theories
conceptual frameworks for explaining a set of facts/concepts
moral theory
explains why an action is right or why a person/character is good
what do theories define
basic moral ideas
two kinds of theory
2. virtue based theories (theories of good character)
Theory’s relation to everyday reasoning
2 types of theories of right action
2. deontological
consequentialist
the rightness of actions depends solely on results - good consequences (utilitarianism)
deontological
rightness of actions is determined partly by their intrinsic nature
utilitarianism
actions are right if they result in most beneficial balance of good over bad consequences
act utilitarianism
rightness determined by consequences of individual actions
rule utilitarianism
right actions are those that conform to rules which when followed consistently, produce more good
Mill/Bentham
greatest happiness principle
mill/bentham: greatest happiness principle
actions are right in proportion as they produce the most happiness
happiness = pleasure/absence of pain
according to bentham/mill: utilitarianism, morality of action is determined by
consequences on happiness
according to bentham/mill: utilitarianism, happiness is equivalent to
unhappiness is equivalent to
pleasure
pain
according to bentham/mill: utilitarianism
every sentient being’s happiness counts
mill’s important point (p. 36)
we need to distinguish between qualitatively higher pleasures and lower pleasures
social reform
bottom-up, fact-based approach to ethics
categorical imperative first formulation
act only on that maxim by which you can at the same will that it should become a universal law
using C.I. 1 in lying
categorical imperative second formulation
so act as to treat humanity, whether in thine own person or in that of any other, in every case as an end in itself, never as a means only
what is the basis of the inherent value of rational beings
people are the only things with inherent or ultimate value - we give value to everything else in the world
- we have “dignity” because we are rational agents, we make decisions based on reasons
natural law theory
doctrine of double effect
main idea: it is always wrong to intentionally perform a bad action even to produce a good effect
- it may be permissible to perform a good action for a good effect even though one foresees that a bad effect results