A group of persons protected by specific laws because of the group’s defining characteristics, including race, color, religion, national origin, gender, age, and disability.
Protected Class
The most important statute covering employment discrimination. This prohibits discrimination against employees, applicants, and union members on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, or gender at any stage of employment.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act
Members go regularly to be rationed jobs as they become available.
Hiring Halls
Monitors compliance with Title VII. A victim of alleged discrimination must file a claim with this commission before bringing a suit against the employer. The commission may then investigate the dispute and attempt to arrange an out-of-court settlement.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
The United States Supreme Court issued an important decision in 2011 that limits the rights of employees-as a group, or class- to bring discrimination claims against their employer.
Limitations on Class Actions
Intentional Discrimination
A form of employment discrimination that results when an employer intentionally discriminates against employees who are members of protected classes.
Disparate-Treatment Discrimination
A case in which the plaintiff has produced sufficient evidence of his or her claim that the case will be decided for the plaintiff unless the defendant produces no evidence to rebut it.
Prima Facie Case
Not the true reason.
Pretext
Establishing Prima Facie Case of Disparate-Treatment Discrimination (Must show all of these)
Employers often use interviews and tests to choose from among a large number of applicants for job openings. Minimum educational requirements are also common. These practices and procedures may have unintentional discriminatory impact on a protected class.
Unintentional Discrimination
Discrimination that results from certain employer practices or procedures that, although not discriminatory on their face, have a discriminatory effect.
Disparate-Impact Discrimination
Two Way of Proving that Disparate-Impact Discrimination Exists
Comparing the employer’s workforce with the pool of qualified individuals available in the local labor market. The plaintiff can show that:
Pool of Applicants
Comparing the employer’s selection rates of members and nonmembers of a protected class. When a job requirement or hiring procedure excludes members of a protected class from an employer’s workforce at substantially higher rate than nonmembers, discrimination occurs, regardless of the balance in the employer’s workforce.
Rate of Hiring
Under this rule, a selection rate for protected classes that is less than four-fifths, or 80 percent, of the rate for the group with the highest rate will generally be regarded as evidence of disparate impact.
Four-Fifths Rule
If an employer’s standards for selecting or promoting employees have a discriminatory effect on job applicants or employees in these protected classes, then a presumption of illegal discrimination arises.
Discrimination Based on Race, Color, and National Origin
Discrimination against “majority” individuals, such as white males.
Reverse Discrimination
Enacted in 1866 to protect the rights of freed slaves, prohibits discrimination on the basis of race or ethnicity in the formation of enforcement of contracts. Because employment is often a contractual relationship, this can provide an alternative basis for a plaintiff’s action and is potentially advantageous because it does not place a cap on damages.
Potential Section 1981 Claims
Employers cannot treat their employees more or less favorably based on the employees’ religious beliefs or practices and cannot require employees to participate in any religious activity (or forbid them from participating in one).
Discrimination Based on Religion
An employer must “reasonably accomodate” the religious practices of its employees, unless to do so would cause undue hardship to the employer’s business.
Reasonable Accommodation
If an employee’s religion prohibits hm or her from working on a certain day of the week, for instance, the employer must make a reasonable attempt to accommodate this requirement. The employer is not required to permanently give the employee the required day off, if to do so would cause the employer undue hardship.
Undue Hardship
Employers are prohibited from classifying jobs as male or female and from advertising positions as male or female unless they can prove that the gender of the applicant is essential to the job. Employers cannot have separate male and female senority and cannot refuse to promote employees based on gender.
Discrimination Based on Gender
Generally, to succeed in a suit for gender discrimination, a plaintiff must demonstrate that gender was a determining factor in the employer’s decision to fire or refuse to hire or promote her or him. Typically, this involves looking at all of the surrounding circumstances.
Gender Must be a Determining Factor