balance between potential benefit of a research project and its potential costs to research participants
(1) the commitment of the psychologist to expanding our knowledge of behavior and the potential benefit the research may have for society and
(2) the cost of the research to the participants
the investigator has the most responsibility but everyone on the committee
impossible to avoid risk of harm entirely
must assess how stressful the situation is likely to be: seizure, heart attack?
consent:
assent:
legally given permission to participate in a study
willingness to participate in a study
difference between APA and medical consent
Medical: patients have the right to know exactly what is being done to them and for what reasons.
APA: participants need be informed only of aspects of the research that might be expected to influence their decisions to participate.
coercion:
compelling or influencing a decision to participate in a study
What is the researcher’s responsibility with respect to the research participant’s right to privacy?
What is deception? Why is deception necessary?
debriefing:
the process of informing participants after the session of the experiment’s true purpose to increase their understanding and to remove possible harmful effects of deception
Codes of ethics of the Canadian Psychological Association and the American Psychological Association
The APA code comprises five principles:
The CPA code contains four principles:
“when a person’s welfare appears to conflict with benefits to society, it is often possible to find ways of working for the benefit of society that do not violate respect and responsible caring for the person.” When this can’t be completed, the individual is more important. As Buban (2016) confirms, “the CPA’s principle more clearly makes the case for individual rights” and takes a more egoist approach compared to the APA code
The CPA lists a ten-step ethical decision making process to be followed.
APA actually doesn’t prescribe a specific model to help psychologists make ethical decisions: more duty oriented
Animal rights:
Animal welfare:
the notion that animals have the same sort of rights as people, including legal rights; not generally accepted
the generally accepted term for concerns about the care and use of animals
The research community clearly supports humane treatment of animals but rejects the notion of animal rights
three Rs in conjunction with animal research:
The general position of researchers, like that of most people, is that it is permissible to cause a certain amount of suffering to a few animals to reduce the suffering of many millions of people
speciesism:
term used by analogy with racism and sexism by those who claim that it is unethical to treat animals differently from humans, particularly in research
How might these ethical guidelines affect the validity of research?