Provisions
Provisions are the calculated amounts that need to be set aside to meet a provider’s future liabilities.
The value of the provisions will depend on the assumptions used to value the future expected cashflows.
List 9 reasons why a provider calculates provisions
BAD MEDICS
What is the difference between individual and global provisions?
Individual provisions relate to an individual contract or scheme member.
Global provisions cannot be allocated to individual contracts or members and relate to a provider’s liabilities as a whole
Risks relating to mismatching of assets or liabilities
Changes in investment conditions may result in the liability cashflows increasing by more than the asset cashflows
This will affect the ability of the provider to meet the liabilities as they fall due and the solvency position of the provider
Explain why an additional premium for mismatching would likely need to be established on a group rather than on a individual contract level
It is rare, for investment purposes, that liabilities of each individual contract are looked at separately and assets earmarked to each contract
It is much more likely that the investment strategy is determined by looking at the group of contracts as a whole.
Therefore, in the same way, the risk of mismatching is a global rather than an individual issue and hence provisions should be established on a global basis
Give an example of one financial and one non-financial risk for which a provider might calculate global provisions
Financial risk - mismatching assets and liabilities
Non-financial risk - operational risk
Basis
The term given to a collection of assumptions
Best estimate basis
Set of assumptions that have an equal probability of overstating and understating the value of the assets and the liabilities.
Optimistic (or weak) basis
Assumptions are chosen which collectively result in a high value of assets and/or a low value of liabilities.
Cautious (or prudent/strong) basis
Assumptions are chosen which collectively result in a low value of assets and/or a high value of liabilities
List the key assumptions the actuary will need to make to value the benefits from an employer-sponsored medical scheme
Suggest sources of information that the actuary could use to set a best estimate basis to value employer-sponsored medical scheme benefits
State the 3 main factors that usually dictate the strength of the basis on which values should be determined
Give 3 examples of how the nature of the assets held can impact the liability valuation
Outline the factors to consider when valuing the liabilities to be shown in the provider’s published accounts and reports (which are used for decision-making by shareholders)
Going concern (or funding) basis for insurance companies
The accounting basis normally required for an insurer’s published accounts, that is based on the assumption that the insurer will continue to trade as normal for the long-term future
Break-up (or discontinuance or wind-up) basis for insurance companies
A valuation basis that assumes that the writing of new business ceases and cover on current policies is terminated.
In relation to general insurance policies, current policyholders would normally be entitled to a proportionate return of the original gross premium.
Deferred acquisition costs would probably have to be written off, also known as a wind-up basis (the amount of an insurer’s acquisition costs incurred as premium is written but earned and expensed over the term of the policy - van google - maak seker hoe ander dit verstaan)
Going concern basis for benefit schemes
Usully assumes that the benefit scheme will be continuing
Funding valuations are conducted to asses:
Break-up basis for benefit schemes
Assumes that the scheme ceases to accrue future benefits on the valuation date
Outline the factors to consider when valuing the liabilities to demonstrate supervisory solvency
(MAAK SEKER)
What basis should be used when valuing the liabilities to be shown in the provider’s internal accounts?
Best estimate, to provide a realistic picture for decision-making by management.
Outline the factors to consider when valuing the liabilities for a transfer of liabilities between two providers
(MAAK SEKER)
What basis should be used when determining whether discretionary benefits can be awarded or benefit improvements made?
(MAAK SEKER)
The provider may want to use assumptions that do not overestimate the surplus available in order to avoid being pressurized into distributing it as discretionary or additional benefits. Similarly, proposed benefit improvements should not be undervalued.
This is because such benefits may prove in practice to be more expensive than had been anticipated.
The most realistic indication will be based on best estimate assumptions, but a cautious basis (or range of assumptions) may be used.
Outline the factors to consider when valuing the liabilities to set contributions for a defined benefits scheme, from the perspective of the trustees and the beneficiaries
(MAAK SEKER)