fraud vs errors
errors:
unintentional
will be found throughout any data set
fraud:
is intentional
found in very few data sets
is like finding a ‘needle in a haystack’
proactive detection vs reactive detection
proactive is seeking it out
reactive is waiting until you have a problem
pros and cons of proactive fraud detection
pro - can find frauds that nobody knew about
con-needle in a haystack, can be time-consuming and often not fruitful
pros and cons of reactive detection
you dont figure out the fraud until reasons are found, and after it’s been going on for some time
6 steps of proactive fraud detection
How to catalog fraud symptoms?
divide them into one of the 6 groups…
if you were to investigate a kickback fraud, classify these symptoms:
analytical symptoms
classify these symptoms:
buyer is an outsider
buyers work habits change unexpected
behavioral sympt-om
classify these symptoms:
lifestyle symptoms
classify these symptoms:
control symptoms
classify these symptoms:
1099 from vendor to one of the buyers relatives
document symptom
classify these symptoms:
tips and complaints
Benford’s Law
stout of any given data set, the first and second digit of any given numbers will likely be a 1 or 2. not so true for 3rd digit on
the first digit will be 1 30% of the time, progressing to only being a 9 in 5% of instances
what is digital analysis?
the art of analyzing digits that make up numbers in data sets.
what is a strength and weakness of digital analysis?
strength - it’s inexpensive
weakness - correlation doesn’t necessarily mean causation and can lead to a waste of time