How we make decisions
2 theories
neo-classical economic theory
behavioural influence
Neo-Classical economic theory
a. Decisions are from careful analysis and utility maximization
- rational, selfish, utility maximizing decision makers
o How we used to think of how people make decisions (rational beings)
o Treat people as problem who needs to be solved
o Ex: I am hungry where do I eat
o Neo-classical economic theory:
We are careful, analytic, and consistently maximize utility to purchase decisions
o Problem recognition -> information search -> evaluation of alternatives -> product choice
behavioural influence
o New way of thinking
o Consumer decisions are responses to environmental cues
Spontaneous decisions
o Response are biased
o Limited capacity for takin in information and making choices
advice on finding customer choice Simonson
to deploy across all need certain assumptions
o Customers can articulate preferences
o That their preferences are stable and fixed
customer preferences are unsafe and easily influenced by irrelevant things examples
Set of alternatives under consideration
Ex: put mor expensive item on menu to make regular items look cheaper
Description of alternatives
Ex: do not want you to ger water so give description of drinks and make prices very small and last
Timing and quality of purchase
We want what we want rn but if we ar buying for a week we want variety
Adding irrelevant features/promotions
Types of customer decision based on effort
Extended problem solving (Slow)
Expensive product, infrequently purchased items, high involvement, unfamiliar, extensive amounts of time spend
Limited problem solving (fast)
Limited effort invested in seeking out the good enough
Use heuristics
* Rule of thumb, lay theories, assumptions,
o Ex: more expensive products are better quality
o Local mom and pop store give best service
Habitual problem solving
Cheaper products, frequently, bought, low involvement, familiar, little thought and time spent
o Is good enough
o Looking at items really quick an buying them
o Could spend all day looking at sandwich’s but I am going to pick
Nudges to push people along
Personalized recommendations:
Amazon uses personalized recommendations to nudge customers towards additional purchases.
Social proof:
Showing how many people have purchased a product or signed up for a service can nudge others to follow suit.
Gamification:
Apps like Duolingo use gamification to make language learning more engaging and addictive, nudging users to keep practicing
cognitive biases
more than 200
1, anchoring
- o Things relative to something as a reference point
o Ex: negotiating salaries the anchoring bias is the initial salary said as it is compare
Signals of product quality as Heuristics
The SEC classification of products and services
Search
o Before I buy I know
o Ex: chips, or iphone
Experience
o I buy I use then I know
o Ex: getting haircut
o 2nd most important to give quality
Credence
o Bought it, used it, and still do not know what it does
o Ex: skincare, getting car done, weight loss industry
o Most important to give quality
brands that went generic
o Alliances gives information of quality
o Problem for experience and credence products
Function of brand when product quality id known
Special Challenges for Ingredient Brands
Inept set
Customers reject as do not suit needs
Inert set
Know about but not inclined to choose but could be options
Evoked/consideration set
Alternatives consumer considers
Some criteria are common
Shared among all such as price, quality
Some of criteria are different
Consumers have unique cerifera such as environmental sustainability while other consumers do not
Determinant criteria: the criteria really matter within brand choice?
The determining criteria that really matters