breach
failure to perform absolute duty
- non breaching party must show willing/able to perform but for breach
substantial performance
under CL, substantial performance is enough (meets k’s essential purpose)
ET: look for substantial performance issues in construction Ks or other similar service Ks
other party’s obligations w/ substantial perforamnce
Other still obligated: if one party has substantially performed, other party is obligated to perform and complete performance
- less than perfect performance by one party does NOT excuse the other party from his obligation
BUT money damages
Thus, substantial performance by A obligates B to perform; but B may seek money damages for the difference between the performance rendered and the performance expected
“substantial”
usually considered at least halfway complete
determining substantial performance
courts look to:
- benefit received by nonbreaching party
- part performance by breaching party
- hardship to breaching party
more likely material breach if
minor breach
does NOT excuse nonbreaching party’s performance
* merely gives right to damages (difference in performance rendered v. expected)
material breach
occurs when one party’s failure to perform under k substantially deprives other party of benefit they bargained for
does NOT apply to UCC ks
material breach is NOT okay - damages
material breach occurs when
rules concerning CL material breach
timeliness of performance
court looks @ all circumstances, not just k dates
timeliness of performance exception
“time is of the essence” clauses
* arises if one party indicates as a term of the K that performance by a given date is essential
* if timely performance is essential as stated in K, failure to perform by that time is a material breach
court looks @ all circumstances, not just k dates