City of Quartz, Davis M: What does this sort of design mean for public space?
Erosion of social interaction: The controlled environments in fortress-like designs discourage social interactions, reducing the opportunities for community engagement and fostering a sense of isolation among individuals.
Loss of genuinely democratic public spaces: This design leads to the privatization of public spaces, such as gated communities, shopping malls, and “bumproof” benches. The result is a decrease in mixed-class public spaces where people from different backgrounds can interact, leading to further social and economic polarization.
Exclusionary design
Oldenburg, R. The Great Good Place (1989): Define “Third place”
A social environment that is separate from the two main environments in our lives: the home (first place) and the workplace (second place). A third place is a neutral, informal gathering spot where people can come together, socialize, and engage in conversation. These places foster a sense of community, promote social interaction, and create opportunities for people to relax and unwind. Examples of third places include cafes, pubs, libraries, parks, and community centers.
Oldenburg, R. The Great Good Place (1989): Characteristics of a third space.
Neutral ground
Leveler
Conversation is the main activity
Accessibility and accommodation
Regulars:
Low profile
Playful
A home away from home
Oldenburg, R. The Great Good Place (1989): What are Third Spaces good for?
Social connections
Mental well-being:
Civic engagement:
Cultural exchange:
Economic benefits:.
Creativity and innovation
Social support
Inclusivity
- The ability to add a sense of community. Also, if you meet co-workers in a third space, it gives the opportunity to have a different kind of conversation. - Can escape your problems for awhile. A relief from stress and loneliness. - "A-Political spaces"
How accessible are third space really?
Can the internet be a third space?
Authors rules of conversation (oldenburg, great good place)
Authors rules of conversation
Where does Prof Freeman disagree with Oldenburg?
Challenges idea of third places as discursive democracies erasing differences
Argues public spaces can be messy, conflictual, and unjust
Conversations may emerge from disconnected publics
Doesn’t believe third places inherently promote democracy or solve problems
Highlights stratification along race and class lines in Ipanema’s public space
Sees public spaces as arenas to challenge, negotiate, and reproduce social order
Emphasizes political possibilities rather than organic civil society growth
Notes from class
- We can not ignore the way these spaces are segregated.
- People are still very status aware.
- This is where people decide what happens politically, especially surrounding transportation.
- Public opinion is decided here.
These places ARE political
What is the myth of the democratic beach?
How does segregation function on the beach?
How did gender roles change with the economic and physical development of the city?
Public/private divide: The emergence of cities led to a spatial separation between work and home, reinforcing the division between public and private spaces.
Economic changes: The shift from agrarian to industrial economies and the rise of service industries changed the nature of work and labor, opening up new employment opportunities for women in cities. However, women were often relegated to lower-paying, part-time, or precarious jobs, reinforcing economic inequality between men and women.
Urban planning and design: City planning and infrastructure have often been designed with a male perspective in mind, prioritizing the needs of male workers and overlooking the unique needs of women. For example, public transportation systems may not account for women’s caregiving responsibilities, making it challenging for them to navigate cities and access resources and opportunities.
Gendered spaces: The development of cities also led to the creation of gendered spaces, such as shopping centers, which can reinforce traditional gender roles and expectations. Women are often more visible in consumer spaces, while men are more visible in workspaces, perpetuating stereotypes about gender and labor.
Women’s safety and mobility: The design of cities and public spaces can impact women’s safety and their ability to move freely. Poorly lit streets, lack of public restrooms, and limited access to safe transportation options can disproportionately affect women and limit their participation in public life.
Is it possible to have a female flaneur? (A flaneuse?)
he possibility of a female flâneur raises several considerations:
Gendered expectations: Women have traditionally been confined to domestic spaces and responsibilities
Safety concerns: Women often experience safety concerns in public spaces.
Visibility and anonymity: The male flâneur is often described as an anonymous figure who can blend into the urban landscape. In contrast, women may face greater scrutiny in public spaces
Intersectionality: The experiences of a female flâneur will also be influenced by other intersecting factors such as race, class, age, and sexuality, which can further shape how women navigate and experience urban spaces.
Despite these challenges, it is indeed possible to have a female flâneur (flâneuse), and feminist scholars and writers have increasingly explored and celebrated the experiences and perspectives of women as urban wanderers. By acknowledging and addressing the unique barriers faced by women in public spaces, the concept of the female flâneur can help challenge traditional gender roles and expectations and contribute to a more inclusive and equitable understanding of urban life.
How did secretarial work become woman’s work?
How did secretarial work become woman’s work?
What do we learn about coffeehouses?
What does Gay New York add to our understanding of urban public spaces?
What does Chauncy mean when he says “privacy could only be had in public”?
When Chauncy says “privacy could only be had in public,” he is referring to the fact that, due to the living conditions in crowded tenements, boarding-houses, and lodging houses, working-class individuals, both gay and straight, had little to no privacy in their homes. As a result, they sought privacy in public spaces such as streets, parks, and rooftops for socializing and engaging in sexual encounters. In these public spaces, they could create some semblance of privacy by carving out hidden or secluded areas for their interactions, thus blurring the boundaries between public and private spaces according to middle-class norms.