What are fixed action patterns and habituation?
Pre-existing links between certain stimuli and responses
Unlearned association - experiencing stimulus - automatically triggers response
What an unconditioned stimuli?
Another example of stimuli that can automatically elicit unlearned unconditioned responses because of a pre-existing, unlearned association
What are motivational value of USs?
USs often elicit unconditioned responses because they have motivational value – they are nice or nasty
What are unconditioned responses?
URs can be like a fixed action pattern – a type of involuntary reflex, they can be overt muscular responses or internal
Difference species have different USs and URs evolved to be useful - anticipate US
What are pre-existing mental links?
What are acquired mental links?
classical and instrumental conditioning
What is an example of pre-existing and acquired associations?
When cough or tickle perceived, patterns of mental/neural activity occur
Activates mental representations of those events - corresponds to perceiving/thinking about the event
Simultaneously activated and mentally associated
Hearing cough excites mental representation, and associations, remembers tickle, so she giggles and squirms
CS indirectly elicits UR, becomes the CR
How is the conditioned response indirect elicitation of UR?
What CR looks like depends on nature of UR and also on what CS is
CR can resemble UR closely (which can make animal look a bit stupid) – but can also be more sophisticated, reflects knowing that the US will happen
What is stimulus substitution?
CS acts as a substitute for the US
Physical properties of food affect CR
Motivational properties of US transfer to CS - evaluative conditioning
e.g. pair branding of a product with motivationally positive images companies hire associative learning experts to exploit this
What is second order conditioning?
world is full of things that were once neutral, but we learned to value positively or negatively through associations
Second order:
Dog = pain, house = dog, response despite no direct link of pain
What did Hull say about classical conditioning not being S-R learning?
Only studying observable things, learning has to be between visible S and visible R, he argued all learning was S>R
All learning requires a reinforcer and a response, but it between stimulus and response
Need a motivationally valuable US to see learning
What did Thorndike say about classical conditioning not being S-R learning?
To form S-R association you need a reinforcer to stamp it in, but not to be learned about itself
All learning requires a reinforcer and a response, but it between stimulus and response
Need a motivationally valuable US to see learning
Why was Hull wrong?
Don’t need motivationally significant US to learn
Don’t need reinforcer to stamp in learning
Shown by a variation of second order conditioning – sensory preconditioning
In sensory preconditioning pair two neutral things in second order conditioning you don’t
What are the methods of studying classical conditioning?
Animal experiments used Skinner boxes and rats or pigeons, pair tones and lights with shock or food
Food experiments - CR is searching for food in food hopper - head entry
How is appetitive conditioning meausured?
With conditioned approach, the learning graph goes UP
Measure is number of head entry responses per minute (rpm) during CS
- tone > food
- click > no food
Head entry increase even though click was never followed by food > generalisation
How is aversive conditioning measured?
Shock experiments are hard to measure directly, so often measure suppression of lever pressing
Before training:
- 20 responses per minute before CS
- 20 rpm CS
After training:
- 20 responses per minute before CS
- 5 rpm during CS - less means rat is afraid
What is extinction?
If you take away the US, the conditioned response CR slowly dissipates - extinction
BUT spontaneous recovery occurs
What is controlled inhibition?
Signals omission of the US
A conditioned inhibitor signals the omission of the US, light signals absence of expected food
Tone excites mental representation of food > light inhibits it
Tone makes you expect food > light counteracts that expectation
What is extinction and spontaneous recovery
Extinction involves removing the US – so the CS that used to predict the US doesn’t any more
CS now predicts the omission of the expected US
This does not eliminate the original learning – it produces additional inhibitory learning that counteracts the excitatory learning
Tone now predicts the omission of food
Inhibitory association more disrupted