Classification Flashcards

(21 cards)

1
Q

What are contractual terms?

A

Rules of an agreement.
## Footnote
They define the rights and obligations of the parties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the three classifications of contractual terms?

A

Conditions, warranties, and innominate terms.
## Footnote
Each classification determines the remedy available on breach.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a condition in contract law?

A

An essential term that goes to the root of the contract.
## Footnote
Failure to fulfil a condition defeats the contract’s purpose.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the effect of breaching a condition?

A

The contract may be repudiated and damages awarded.
## Footnote
The innocent party can end the contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Which case shows that breach of a condition allows termination?

A

Poussard v Spiers & Pond.
## Footnote
Missing rehearsals breached a condition and ended the contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a warranty in contract law?

A

A minor term that does not go to the root of the contract.
## Footnote
Breach does not defeat the contract’s main purpose.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the effect of breaching a warranty?

A

Only damages are awarded.
## Footnote
The contract continues.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which case illustrates breach of a warranty?

A

Bettini v Gye.
## Footnote
Missing rehearsals breached a warranty, so only damages were available.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How do courts decide between a condition and a warranty?

A

By assessing whether the term goes to the root of the contract.
## Footnote
If it does, it is a condition; if not, a warranty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which cases illustrate the ‘root of the contract’ test?

A

Poussard v Spiers & Pond and Bettini v Gye.
## Footnote
They contrast condition vs warranty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When is statutory classification of a term conclusive?

A

When legislation specifies a term as a condition or warranty.
## Footnote
Courts must follow statute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Which statute classifies certain terms as conditions?

A

Sale of Goods Act 1979.
## Footnote
Quality-related terms are conditions in B2B contracts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Can parties decide whether a term is a condition or warranty?

A

Yes, parties may specify the classification.
## Footnote
However, courts can intervene.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Which case shows courts can reclassify an unreasonable condition?

A

Schuler v Wickman.
## Footnote
An unreasonable condition was treated as a warranty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is an innominate term?

A

A term that may be a condition or warranty depending on the breach.
## Footnote
Its seriousness determines the remedy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When is breach of an innominate term treated as serious?

A

When it deprives a party of substantially the whole benefit of the contract.
## Footnote
This allows termination.

17
Q

Which case established the innominate term approach?

A

Hong Kong Fir Shipping.
## Footnote
Serious deprivation justified termination.

18
Q

How do courts generally view innominate terms?

A

They are reluctant to use them.
## Footnote
Courts prefer certainty.

19
Q

Which case created an exception for shipping contracts?

A

Bunge Corporation.
## Footnote
‘Readiness to load’ clauses are always conditions.

20
Q

How are innominate terms treated in sale of goods cases?

A

Only serious breaches justify termination.
## Footnote
Minor breaches lead to damages only.

21
Q

Which case applies innominate terms to sale of goods?

A

Cehave v Bremer.
## Footnote
Only serious deprivation justified termination.