What does coding refer to in memory?
The specific format in which information is stored
Baddeley (1966) discovered that STM codes acoustically and LTM codes semantically.
According to Baddeley (1966), how does STM code information?
Acoustically (by sound)
Participants struggled to recall acoustically similar words immediately.
According to Baddeley (1966), how does LTM code information?
Semantically (by meaning)
Participants struggled with semantically similar words after a 20-minute interval.
What is capacity in the context of memory?
The measure of how much information a memory store can hold
Jacobs (1887) found the mean digit span for STM was 9.3 items.
What did Miller (1956) propose regarding STM capacity?
The ‘Magical Number 7 ± 2’
He noted that ‘chunking’ can extend this limit.
What is the believed capacity of LTM?
Unlimited
No measurable limit has ever been identified.
What does duration refer to in memory?
The length of time information can be held
Peterson & Peterson (1959) found STM duration is approximately 18 seconds if rehearsal is prevented.
What did Bahrick (1975) find regarding LTM duration?
LTM can last a lifetime
Recognition accuracy was 90% after 15 years and 70% after 48 years using yearbook photos.
Fill in the blank: Chunking in real life helps remember long phone numbers by reducing them to _______.
Meaningful units
For example, chunking 07123456789 into 07123—456—789.
Why is rote-rehearsing sounds less effective for long-term retention than creating mind maps?
Because LTM is semantic
Understanding this explains the effectiveness of linking to meaning.
What is a major criticism of Baddeley and Peterson & Peterson studies?
Artificiality of stimuli
Use of word lists and consonant trigrams lacks mundane realism.
What is praised about Bahrick’s study?
High ecological validity
It used real-life memories, making findings more generalizable.
What methodological issue is associated with Jacobs (1887) research?
Lacked adequate control
Extraneous variables may have confounded results, reducing internal validity.
What did Cowan (2001) suggest about STM capacity?
Closer to 4 chunks
This challenges Miller’s ‘7 ± 2’ theory, implying overestimation of innate capacity.