a community’s structure and stability
affected by the interaction between species
(trophic, competition, positive)
species interaction
direct interaction
occurs between two species
indirect interaction
direct relationship between two species is mediated by a third or more species
interaction webs
predict community stability
- number of weak interactions increases with species richness
- presence of many weak links is associated with better outcomes after the loss of a secondary consumer
- but, species-rich communities are more resilient to keystone species loss
trophic cascades
result of trophic interactions
rate of consumption at one trophic level results in a change of species abundance or composition at lower trophic levels
ex: wolves-elk-aspen trees
competition shapes…
community membership
- resource mediated coexistence: environmental factors affect the dominant species’ ability to acquire resources
- disturbances may affect growth or survival of a dominant species
- certain guilds or functional groups may have higher success at different successional stages due to their ability to access limiting resources
pioneer species
advanced stages of succession
competition is an increasingly important interaction
pioneer species make the habitat amenable for other species, which are then able to compete for limiting resources, such as nutrients and water
disturbances
intermediate disturbance hypothesis
foundation species
provide the physical habitat for many other species in their community
ex: aspen trees and kelp
keystone species
have a role that is critical to the survival of their entire trophic network
ex: wolves and otters
ecosystem engineers
modify the ecosystem through its morphology or behavior
allogenic: alter biotic or abiotic elements to create habitat
autogenic: modify the environment by its presence
umbrella species