False. The safety-first approach focuses on lifetime spending potential, not wealth maximization. (LO 18-1-1)
False. The safety-first approach suggests that risky assets are inherently risky and just because something may have worked in the limited historical record does not mean it can be expected to continue working in the future. (LO 18-1-1)
True. (LO 18-1-1)
True. (LO 18-1-1)
True. (LO 18-1-1)
True. (LO 18-1-2)
False. Annuities could have limited uses, but are generally too costly for any marginal increase in safety over a systematic withdrawal strategy. Also, the cost of annuitizing basic needs could lower the changes to achieve entire lifestyle spending goal. (LO 18-1-2)
False. The probability-based approach relies primarily on precautionary savings and portfolio diversification. (LO 18-1-2)
True. (LO 18-1-2)
10.With the probability-based approach, retirees divide their spending goals between essential needs and discretionary expenses and emphasize the importance of making sure that essential needs will be met.
False. Spending goals are not prioritized as the view is that retirees have a particular lifestyle goal in mind and not meeting that overall goal indicates failure. (LO 18-1-2)
A. Assets are matched to goals so the risk levels are comparable.
B. A total return approach is used.
C. A time-segmented total return approach is used.
D. A buy and hold indexing approach is used
A. Portfolio diversification
B. Hedging
C. Insurance
D. Variable annuities
I. A segmented investment approach is almost always used.
II. Goals are prioritized and the investment strategy is adjusted accordingly.
A. I only
B. II only
C. Both I and II
D. Neither I nor II
A. Social Security
B. Bond ladders
C. Fixed annuities
D. Equities