a. KO shall send out the notice of a pre-award debriefing within 3-days of Request and Competitive Range Determination.
b. The primary difference is the regulatory guidance. (2818, s. 8-9)
i. FAR 15.505 describes pre-award debriefings (“Offerors excluded from the competitive range or otherwise excluded from the competition before award may request a debriefing before award (10 U.S.C. 2305(b)(6)(A) and 41 U.S.C. 253b(f)-(h))”)
ii. FAR 15.506 describes post-award debriefings.
c. Offerors are only entitled to one debriefing for each proposal (2818, s. 10)
a. Cancellation of solicitation or other request
b. An award or proposed award of contract
c. Termination or cancellation of an award of contract
d. Exclusion from the “competitive range”
e. Failing to follow stated evaluation factors!
a. GAO
i. “The inexpensive and expeditious resolution of protests”
ii. Resolution within 100 calendar days of protest filing (65 calendar days if treated under “express option”)
iii. Automatic stay of contract award or performance (“CICA Stay”)
b. Awarding Agency
i. Performance suspended, pending resolution
ii. Best efforts to resolve agency protests within 35 days
c. Court of Federal Claims
i. The only judicial forum for hearing administrative protests
d. Specialized Entities
i. E.g., Small Business Administration or the Bureau of Indian Affairs
a. Documentation Not Presented to/Considered by SSA
b. Validity of Requirements
c. Prohibited Information (FAR 15.506(e))
d. Names of Past Performance References
e. Names of SST Members
f. Unit Prices Not Freely Releaseable under FOIA
a. Simple or complex depending on the nature of the contract and intended performance
b. No universal format that must be followed
c. Should cover all issues necessary to ensure that all parties understand their roles and suspense dates for assigned tasks
d. Should be kept as simple and precise as possible
a. A post-award orientation aids both Government and contractor personnel to (1) achieve a clear and mutual understanding of all contract requirements, and (2) identify and resolve potential problems. However, it is not a substitute for the contractor’s fully understanding the work requirements at the time offers are submitted, nor is it to be used to alter the final agreement arrived at in any negotiations leading to contract award”. FAR 42.501
a. Establishing the time and place of the conference;
b. Preparing the agenda, when necessary;
c. Notifying appropriate Government representations (e.g., contracting/contract administration office) and the contractor;
d. Designating or acting as the chairperson;
e. Conducting a preliminary meeting of Government personnel, and
f. Preparing a summary report of the conference”.
a. Manage contractor performance
b. Resolve issues and concerns raised by the parties
c. Adhere to the timelines of the contract
d. Replace and or appointment quality surveillance personnel
e. Calculate claims or settlements
f. Answer concerns or questions raised by management
g. Achieve your organizations’ goals
a. FAR Part 42 includes subparts on:
b. Contract Audit Services
c. Contract Administration Services
d. Contract Administration Office Functions
e. Postaward Orientation
f. Corporate Administrative Contracting Officer
g. Indirect Cost Rates
h. Disallowance of Costs
i. Production Surveillance and Reporting
j. Contractor Performance Information
a. contractor compensation,
b. costs and payment,
c. Government property, and
d. surveillance and status reporting
a. CORs should be appointed when managing the performance, costs, schedule tracking of services contracts.
a. Makes any task or contract award commitment
b. Negotiates contract modifications
c. Negotiates technical or pricing issues with the contractor
d. Modifies stated contract terms and conditions
a. Contracting officer’s “eyes and ears”
b. Technical expertise
c. Understands the contract
d. Has the training, knowledge, experience, skills, and ability to perform the role
e. Knows the performance requirements and standards in-depth
f. Provides support to Contracting Officer
g. Understands the assessment strategies in the QASP
h. Accurately assesses contractor performance
i. Effective communicator with good interpersonal skills
j. Reviews invoices and maintains appropriate files
a. COR/COTR promptly inspects services delivered by Contractor
b. COR/COTR identifies those that meet, exceed or do not meet requirements performance standards
c. COR/COTR documents assessment of services performed and provides a notice of satisfactory or unsatisfactory completion of requirements
d. COR/COTR completes required performance reports thoroughly and accurately
e. COR/COTR and contracting officer manage the review process for Contractor documents and deliverables, verifying the timeliness and accuracy of Contractor reports and data to be delivered to the Government
f. For any unsatisfactory or discrepancies in performance, COR/COTR will document, notify contracting officer and discuss with Contractor
g. For any disputes between the COR/COTR and the Contractor or any issues other than technical problems, COR/COTR will refer to contracting officer
h. Contracting officer coordinates performance assessments and works to resolve disputes with Contractor
i. COR/COTR must be careful not to direct the Contractor and its personnel
a. Validating contractor invoices (not for CPIF line items)
b. Tracking cost data
c. change management
d. Ensuring timely contractor payment
a. Assessing performance via the QASP
b. Documenting performance for incentives
c. Documenting performance annually in the government past performance databases
within 30 days after (1) receipt of a written change order under paragraph (a) of this clause or (2) the furnishing of a written notice under paragraph (b) of this clause, by submitting to the Contracting Officer a written statement describing the general nature and amount of the proposal, unless this period is extended by the Government.
The statement of proposal for adjustment may be included in the notice under paragraph (b) of this clause.
(f) No proposal by the Contractor for an equitable adjustment shall be allowed if asserted after final payment under this contract.
a. Contractor must establish an entitlement to an adjustment based on the Government’s actions or in actions;
b. Contractor has got to show that damages (quantum) to the contractor occurred in the form of increased cost;
c. Contractor has to show a link between the government’s actions causing the increase and the damage claimed; and
d. Contractor has to produce evidence or proof of the amount claimed.
a. Date and dollar amount of the contract award and / or modification.
b. Date of submission of the initial contract proposal and dollar amount.
c. Date of alleged delays or disruptions.
d. Performance dates as scheduled at date of award and / or modification.
e. Date entitlement to an equitable adjustment was determined.
f. Date of certification of request for adjustment if certification is required.
g. Dates of any pertinent Government actions or other key events during contract performance which may have an impact on the contractor’s request for equitable adjustment.
a. Government bears part of the cost risk on Fixed Price Incentive
b. Pricing of changes has impact on incentive arrangements
c. Billing prices must be adjusted with cost level to maintain proper cash flow
d. Final Price Revision Proposal sets final prices
(1) Funds are available;
(2) The requirement covered by the option fulfills an existing Government need;
(3) The exercise of the option is the most advantageous method of fulfilling the Government’s need, price and other factors (see paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section) considered;
The option was synopsized in accordance with Part 5 unless exempted by 5.202(a)(11) or other appropriate exemptions in 5.202, and
g. (5) The contractor is not listed on the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS) (see 9.405-1).”
a. The impacted labor categories need to be modified and the new total labor amounts must then be rolled up into the overall cost calculations to determine the new total price. The follow-on slides illustrate these calculations and cost impact of the new wage rate determinations